This site has been created for institutional investors and RIAs. An institutional investor is an entity that invests capital on behalf of others such as pension funds, banks, insurance companies, mutual funds, foundations/endowments, trust companies or other large investors and their investment consultants. RIA is a registered investment advisor who is responsible for allocating their client funds. This site is not intended for individual investor access, as it does not consider individual risk tolerances or investment objectives of an individual investor. Click “Accept and Continue” to affirm you meet the description of an Institutional Investor.
This site has been designed for financial intermediaries such as financial advisors, wealth managers, broker/dealers and home office research teams. This site is not intended for individual investor access, as it does not consider individual risk tolerances or investment objectives of an individual investor. Click “Accept and Continue” to affirm you meet the description of a Financial Advisor.
This area of the website contains information that is general and/or educational in nature. Individual investors should consider their own investment objectives and risk tolerances or consult with a financial advisor before making any investment decision. Click “Accept and Continue” to continue.
Aristotle Pacific’s Jeffrey Klingelhofer, CFA, joined host Chuck Jaffe on the “Money Life” podcast to discuss the Federal Reserve’s approach to inflation under new chairman Kevin Warsh, the potential economic impact of higher interest rates and why a near-term downturn could ultimately create a stronger foundation for markets.
Jeff Klingelhofer Managing Director, Portfolio Manager
About Aristotle Pacific Aristotle Pacific Capital is a Newport Beach, Calif.-based registered investment adviser that actively invests in credit securities on the basis of fundamental credit analysis with the objective of identifying and realizing relative value. The firm manages credit strategies across floating-rate loans, CLOs, multi-sector, high-yield, investment-grade, and short-duration bonds.
U.S. small/mid cap equities delivered a strong rebound during the second quarter of 2026, outperforming large cap stocks as investor sentiment improved amid resilient economic growth, easing geopolitical tensions, and broadening market participation. The Russell 2500 Index gained 20.26% during the quarter, marking its strongest quarterly return since 2020 and one of the best quarterly performances in its history. Healthy consumer spending, a stable labor market, and generally better than expected corporate earnings reinforced confidence in the economic outlook, while lower energy prices and reduced concerns surrounding Middle East tensions further supported expectations for moderating inflation and continued expansion. As optimism broadened beyond the largest technology companies, investors increasingly rotated into smaller companies poised to benefit from improving economic conditions, accelerating capital investment, and renewed capital markets activity.
Stylistically, growth stocks outperformed their value counterparts during the quarter, with the Russell 2500 Growth Index returning 24.02% compared to the 18.50% return of the Russell 2500 Value index. Performance was driven by AI-related beneficiaries, higher beta companies, and businesses with accelerating revenue growth. Technology was the standout sector, led by significant gains in semiconductors, semiconductor equipment, networking infrastructure, and other AI-enabling hardware, while Industrials benefited from strength in power infrastructure, electrical equipment, engineering, and manufacturing related businesses. Health Care also rebounded, led by biotechnology and life sciences. In contrast, Energy gave back a portion of its first quarter gains as oil prices declined, while traditionally defensive sectors, including Utilities, Consumer Staples, and Materials, lagged. More broadly, investors favored higher growth and economically sensitive companies over higher quality, dividend paying, and more defensive businesses, leaving slower growth retailers, banks, commercial services, and consumer staples among the quarter’s relative laggards. Factors that had the strongest payoffs were sentiment and efficiency, while factors such as low volatility, low variability, low leverage, and quality paid off negatively.
At the sector level, almost all sectors paid off positively. The best performing sectors were Information Technology (+65.79%), Health Care (+19.32%), and Industrials (+19.09%) while the worst performing sectors were Energy (-9.72%), Materials (+1.01%), and Utilities (+1.54%).
Sources: CAPS Composite Hub, Russell Investments
Past performance is not indicative of future results. Composite returns are presented gross and net of the maximum wrap fee and include the reinvestment of all income. Net returns are calculated by subtracting the highest applicable wrap/SMA fee, which includes trading costs and custodial fees, from the gross monthly composite return (2.00% on an annual basis, or 0.167% monthly). Composite. Please see important disclosures at the end of this document.
Performance Review
For the second quarter of 2026, the Aristotle Small/Mid Cap Equity WM Composite generated a total return of 9.55% net of fees (10.08% gross of fees), underperforming the 20.26% total return of the Russell 2500 Index. Security selection detracted from performance, while allocation effect aided results. The largest detractors to relative performance were security selection in Information Technology (owning Everforth coupled with not owning SanDisk or quantum computing stocks and non-earning SaaS companies) and Industrials coupled with overweight allocations to Materials and Energy. This was partially offset by security selection in the Utilities and Consumer Staples sectors coupled with underweight allocations to Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary.
Relative Contributors
Relative Detractors
MACOM Technology Solutions
SanDisk (not owned in the portfolio)
Mercury Systems
Alamos Gold
Insmed (not owned in the portfolio)
Huron Consulting Group
Knowles
Range Resources
WillScot Holdings
Permian Resources
CONTRIBUTORS
MACOM Technology Solutions (MTSI), is a designer and manufacturer of high performance semiconductor products. The stock benefitted from strong earnings results and forward guidance featuring continued strong revenue and profitability, driven by accelerating demand across data‑center, industrial/defense, and telecom end markets. We maintain our position, as we believe the company’s meaningful exposure to growing demand from Data Center and 5G end market applications along with the integration of recent acquisitions and domestic manufacturing footprint should continue to drive shareholder value.
Mercury Systems (MRCY), is a developer of mission critical computing, signal processing, software, and secure electronics technologies used in aerospace and defense applications. The stock was rewarded for the company’s successful acceleration of deliveries on several high priority defense programs, alongside continued progress on its restructuring initiatives and cost reduction efforts. We maintain our position as we believe Mercury Systems is emerging from a multi-year operational reset, with improving execution, expanding margins, and lower leverage. In addition, we believe the stock is trading at attractive valuations relative to its normalized earnings power given the strong underlying demand across its aerospace and defense end markets, which should continue to create shareholder value over time.
DETRACTORS
SanDisk (SNDK), engages in the development, manufacture, and provision of storage devices and solutions based on NAND flash technology. Its products include solid state drives, memory cards, and USB flash drives. The stock rallied during the quarter on improving memory cycle sentiment and AI‑driven storage demand. The portfolio did not own the position which resulted in a drag on relative performance versus the benchmark.
Alamos Gold (AGI), a Canadian gold producer focused on developing and operating high quality mines in North America, detracted from performance following a reduction in 2026 production guidance driven by operational challenges at its Young-Davidson mine, including seismic activity, lower mining rates, and higher costs. Weaker gold prices during the quarter also weighed on the shares. We believe these headwinds are temporary and continue to view the company favorably given the successful ramp up of the Island Gold District, a robust project pipeline, and attractive long term production growth.
Recent Portfolio Activity
Buys/Acquisitions
Sells/Liquidations
Jones Lang LaSalle
Americold Realty Trust
UMB Financial
Verra Mobility
WesBanco
BUYS/ACQUISITIONS
Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL), is a leading global commercial real estate services firm positioned to benefit from a recovery in leasing, capital markets, and investment activity as commercial real estate fundamentals improve. Its diversified business mix, growing recurring revenue streams, and global scale can provide resilient earnings and durable competitive advantages. We believe improving transaction volumes and continued growth in higher value advisory and outsourcing services will support long-term earnings growth and shareholder value.
UMB Financial (UMBF), is a regional bank with a diversified business model spanning commercial banking, institutional asset servicing, private wealth management, healthcare payments, and specialty financial services. Unlike many regional banks, UMB generates a meaningful portion of its revenue from fee based businesses, providing a more stable earnings profile and reducing reliance on net interest income. The company has consistently demonstrated disciplined underwriting, strong credit quality, and a conservative balance sheet, positioning it to perform across economic cycles. We believe UMB is well positioned to benefit from improving loan growth, expanding fee income, and continued market share gains, while its strong capital position and attractive returns on equity support long term earnings growth and shareholder value.
WesBanco (WSBC), is a regional bank with a diversified franchise spanning commercial banking, consumer banking, wealth management, and trust services. We believe the stock is trading at an attractive valuation as the market underappreciates the earnings potential created by the successful integration of Premier Financial, improving operating efficiency, expanding margins, strong capital levels, and robust loan growth.
SELLS/LIQUIDATIONS
Americold Realty Trust (COLD), is a real estate investment trust focused on the ownership, operation, development, and acquisition of temperature controlled warehouses. The position was liquidated due to deteriorating fundamentals.
Verra Mobility (VRRM), is a provider of automated enforcement, tolling, and parking technologies and solutions. We exited the position after the loss of a significant customer contract materially changed our investment thesis, reducing confidence in the company’s long term earnings and growth outlook. The proceeds were redeployed into higher conviction opportunities.
Outlook
We remain constructive on the long-term outlook for the small/mid-cap segment of the U.S. market. Valuations continue to appear attractive, with the Russell 2500 Index trading near multi-decade lows relative to large caps, while earnings have begun to reaccelerate. Consensus estimates point to small cap earnings growth surpassing large cap growth by late 2026/early 2027. Incremental increase in M&A activity, improving domestic manufacturing trends supported by reshoring and infrastructure investment, and a more favorable regulatory and tariff backdrop should provide longer term tailwinds for the asset class. Near term, we remain cautious as geopolitical risks, including the Iran conflict and related inflationary spillovers, may contribute to elevated volatility. Separately, mid-term election uncertainty has historically been associated with increased market volatility but has often given way to more durable small cap recoveries following the election cycle.
Positioning
Our current positioning is a function of our bottom-up security selection process and our ability to identify what we view as attractive investment candidates, regardless of economic sector definitions. Overweights in Financials and Materials are mostly a function of our underlying company specific views rather than any top-down predictions for each sector. Conversely, we continue to be underweight in Consumer Discretionary, as we have been unable to identify what we consider to be compelling long-term opportunities that fit our discipline given the rising risk profiles of many retail businesses and a potential deceleration in goods spending following a period of strength. We are also underweight in Industrials as we have been unable to identify what we consider to be more compelling long-term opportunities that fit our discipline versus companies belonging to other sectors. Given our focus on long-term business fundamentals, our patient investment approach and low portfolio turnover, the strategy’s sector positioning generally does not change significantly from quarter to quarter. However, we may take advantage of periods of volatility by adding selectively to certain companies when appropriate.
Disclosures
The opinions expressed herein are those of Aristotle Capital Boston, LLC (Aristotle Boston) and are subject to change without notice.
Past performance is not indicative of future results. The information provided in this report should not be considered financial advice or a recommendation to purchase or sell any particular security. There is no assurance that any securities discussed herein will remain in an account’s portfolio at the time you receive this report or that securities sold have not been repurchased. The securities discussed may not represent an account’s entire portfolio and, in the aggregate, may represent only a small percentage of an account’s portfolio holdings. The performance attribution presented is of a representative account from Aristotle Boston’s Small/Mid Cap Equity WM Composite. The representative account is a discretionary client account which was chosen to most closely reflect the investment style of the strategy. The criteria used for representative account selection is based on the account’s period of time under management and its similarity of holdings in relation to the strategy. It should not be assumed that any of the securities transactions, holdings or sectors discussed were or will be profitable, or that the investment recommendations or decisions Aristotle Boston makes in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of the securities discussed herein. Aristotle Boston reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs. Recommendations made in the last 12 months are available upon request.
Composite returns are presented gross and net of the maximum wrap fee and include the reinvestment of all income. Net returns are calculated by subtracting the highest applicable wrap/SMA fee, which includes trading costs and custodial fees, from the gross monthly composite return (2.00% on an annual basis, or 0.167% monthly)All investments carry a certain degree of risk, including the possible loss of principal. Investments are also subject to political, market, currency and regulatory risks or economic developments. International investments involve special risks that may in particular cause a loss in principal, including currency fluctuation, lower liquidity, different accounting methods and economic and political systems, and higher transaction costs. These risks typically are greater in emerging markets. While Large-capitalization companies may have more stable prices than smaller, less established companies, they are still subject to equity securities risk. In addition, large-capitalization equity security prices may not rise as much as prices of equity securities of small-capitalization companies. Securities of small- and medium-sized companies tend to have a shorter history of operations, be more volatile and less liquid. Value stocks can perform differently from the market as a whole and other types of stocks. The material is provided for informational and/or educational purposes only and is not intended to be and should not be construed as investment, legal or tax advice and/or a legal opinion. Investors should consult their financial and tax adviser before making investments. The opinions referenced are as of the date of publication, may be modified due to changes in the market or economic conditions, and may not necessarily come to pass. Information and data presented has been developed internally and/or obtained from sources believed to be reliable. Aristotle Boston does not guarantee the accuracy, adequacy or completeness of such information.
Aristotle Capital Boston, LLC is an independent investment adviser registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended. Registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training. More information about Aristotle Boston, including our investment strategies, fees and objectives, can be found in our Form ADV Part 2, which is available upon request. ACB-2607-16
Performance Disclosures
Sources: CAPS Composite Hub, Russell Investments
Composite returns for periods ended June 30, 2026, are final.
*The Aristotle Small/Mid Cap Equity WM Composite (“Composite”) has an inception date of January 1, 2008, at a predecessor firm. During this time, Jack McPherson and Dave Adams had primary responsibility for managing the strategy. Performance starting January 1, 2015, was achieved at Aristotle Boston.
The Composite includes all discretionary accounts managed in this strategy and is based on the institutional composite track record. The composite currently consists of only institutional accounts and does not contain any fully bundled fee wrap portfolios. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance results for periods greater than one year have been annualized. Composite returns are presented gross and net of the maximum wrap fee and include the reinvestment of all income. Net returns are calculated by subtracting the highest applicable wrap/SMA fee, which includes trading costs and custodial fees, from the gross monthly composite return (2.00% on an annual basis, or 0.167% monthly). Please see important disclosures enclosed within this document.
Index Disclosures
The Russell 2500® Index measures the performance of the small to mid cap segment of the U.S. equity universe. The Russell 2500 Index is a subset of the Russell 3000® Index. It includes approximately 2500 of the smallest securities based on a combination of their market cap and current index membership. The Russell 2500 Growth® Index measures the performance of the small/mid cap companies located in the United States that also exhibit a growth probability. The Russell 2500 Value® Index measures the performance of the small/mid cap companies located in the United States that also exhibit a value probability. The volatility (beta) of the composite may be greater or less than the benchmarks. It is not possible to invest directly in these indices.
Sources: CAPS CompositeHubTM, Bloomberg Past performance is not indicative of future results. Aristotle Value Equity WM Composite returns are presented pure gross and net of the maximum wrap fee and include the reinvestment of all income. Pure gross returns do not reflect the deduction of any trading costs or other fees and are supplemental to the net returns. Net returns are calculated by subtracting the highest applicable wrap/SMA fee, which includes trading costs and custodial fees, from the pure gross composite return. (From inception to 12/31/2015, the highest applicable wrap/SMA fee is 3.00% on an annual basis, or 0.75% quarterly. From 1/1/2016 to 12/31/2023, the highest applicable wrap/SMA fee is 2.00% on an annual basis, or 0.50% quarterly and 0.17% monthly from 1/1/2024 to present.)Please see important disclosures at the end of this document.
When capital is rushing away from resilient, predictable franchises to crowd into unpredictable, uncertain and yet-to-be-proven themes, it may create a headwind for our strategy. As speculative enthusiasm intensifies and capital becomes increasingly concentrated, those headwinds can grow considerably. And the more indiscriminate the inflows into those speculative areas, the more pronounced those headwinds become.
But we are not standing still. We are eagerly accumulating what in our view are durable quality companies at valuations we believe to be attractive.
The Scale of the Spending Firehose – From Processing Units to Memory Chips
A big part of recent underperformance is underexposure to spending on the data center ecosystem:
Much of today’s AI spending is going into short-lived data center hardware (three- to five-year economic life), especially processors and memory, rather than permanent infrastructure.
In the U.S., there are roughly 4,000 existing data centers. Today, there are almost 3,000 more planned or under construction. This spending has created extreme bottlenecks, first in processing and then in memory, driving extraordinary scarcity profits.
For the first two years of this cycle, Nvidia stood directly in front of the firehose, absorbing a point-blank blast of capital that took pre-tax cash flow from $8 billion in 2023 to an estimated $250 billion in 2026.
The firehose has pivoted to memory, as Micron’s pre-tax cash flow is estimated to rise from $2.5 billion in 2023 to approximately $100 billion in FY26 and $200 billion in FY27 — year to date through June 30, Micron had the largest weight in the Russell 1000 Value Index and was up approximately 300%, contributing nearly 20% of the Index’s return.
These are real earnings, but they are scarcity earnings, and when supply catches up, we believe pricing, earnings, and valuations will normalize.
Source: Factset
K Shaped: Wall Street Asset Owners and Main Street Consumers
But most businesses sit outside the AI data center ecosystem, and many are struggling:
The broader construction industry is facing its toughest environment since the Global Financial Crisis.
High rates have frozen housing activity, with turnover at its lowest level since the early 1990s.
The average U.S. home age is now a record 44 years old.
The average first-time homebuyer age is now 40, up from 32 in 2016.
In short, AI infrastructure is booming, but much of the real economy is not (sidenote: social and political consequences may follow).
Quality: Three Archetypes
We remain focused on Quality fundamentals, Valuations we believe are attractive, and Catalysts controlled by management teams with a long-term strategic plan (“QVC”).
When we explain that our investment process starts with “quality,” clients often balk. After all, what active manager doesn’t “seek high quality?” Fair point. But like beauty, quality is in the eye of the beholder, and we see three kinds: Transient, Conventional and Durable.
Transient Quality looks exceptional at the peak, with scarcity-driven pricing power, margin expansion, and high returns on capital that Wall Street often mistakes for permanent economics. But there is no cartel; supply eventually catches up, prices normalize and, once investors realize what has happened, significant valuation resets can occur. Consider memory technology companies today.
Conventional Quality still has powerful brands, customer loyalty, incumbency advantages, and ecosystem lock-in – but the old moats are eroding. Digital advertising, ecommerce, private label, low barriers to entry, and AI disruption have made many of these franchises less structurally resilient than they once were.
Durable Quality is where we are most energized, because scarcity is permanent rather than cyclical (or at least less so). These businesses can raise prices ahead of inflation for years without impairing volume, protected by natural monopolies, geology, irreplaceable infrastructure, essentiality, regulation, or deliberate scarcity. Consider businesses like luxury goods, regulated utilities, and mission-critical technology solutions, or specialty data providers, unique ingredient producers, and transportation platforms.
Performance and Attribution Summary
For the second quarter of 2026, Aristotle Capital’s Value Equity WM Composite posted a total return of 4.36% pure gross of fees (3.85% net of fees), underperforming the 13.84% return of the Russell 1000 Value Index and the 15.20% return of the S&P 500 Index. Please refer to the table for detailed performance.
Performance (%)
2Q26
YTD
1 Years
3 Years
5 Years
10 Years
Value Equity WM Composite (pure gross)
4.36
2.34
8.32
11.03
6.40
11.82
Value Equity WM Composite (net)
3.85
1.33
6.20
8.86
4.28
9.60
Russell 1000 Value Index
13.84
16.23
27.09
17.78
11.17
11.52
S&P 500 Index
15.20
10.21
22.33
20.61
13.41
15.51
Past performance is not indicative of future results. Aristotle Value Equity WM Composite returns are presented pure gross and net of the maximum wrap fee and include the reinvestment of all income. Pure gross returns do not reflect the deduction of any trading costs or other fees and are supplemental to the net returns. Net returns are calculated by subtracting the highest applicable wrap/SMA fee, which includes trading costs and custodial fees, from the pure gross composite return. (From inception to 12/31/2015, the highest applicable wrap/SMA fee is 3.00% on an annual basis, or 0.75% quarterly. From 1/1/2016 to 12/31/2023, the highest applicable wrap/SMA fee is 2.00% on an annual basis, or 0.50% quarterly and 0.17% monthly from 1/1/2024 to present.) Please see important disclosures at the end of this document.
Source: FactSet Past performance is not indicative of future results. Sector attribution shows how much of a portfolio’s overall return is directly attributable to stock selection and asset allocation decisions within the portfolio, highlighting which sectors contributed or detracted to the total return. Attribution includes the reinvestment of income. Attribution is presented pure gross of fees and does not include the deduction of all fees and expenses that a client or investor has paid or would have paid. Please refer to the gross and net composite returns included within to understand the overall impact of fees.
The portfolio’s underperformance relative to the Russell 1000 Value Index in the second quarter can be attributed to security selection, while allocation effects contributed. Security selection in Information Technology and Industrials, as well as an overweight in Materials, detracted the most from relative performance. Conversely, an overweight in Information Technology, an underweight in Energy, and security selection in Communication Services contributed. (Relative weights are the result of bottom-up security selection.)
Contributors and Detractors for 2Q 2026
Relative Contributors
Relative Detractors
Qualcomm
TotalEnergies
Microchip Technology
Autodesk
Alphabet
Verizon
PNC Financial Services
Corteva
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial
Motorola Solutions
Relative contributors and detractors are based on attribution total effect and exclude benchmark securities not held in the portfolio.
Corteva, the seed and crop protection company, was one of the largest detractors during the period. While fundamentals remained healthy, with first-quarter FREE cash flow supported by strength in both Seed and Crop Protection, the stock lagged a sharply rising market as investors focused on Corteva’s more tempered outlook for the balance of the year. The management team cited potential second-half headwinds from tariffs, higher oil-related input costs, farmer fuel expenses, and competitive crop protection pricing in Latin America and Asia. We believe the market also weighed the near-term complexity of Corteva’s planned fourth-quarter separation into New Corteva and Vylor, including potential dis-synergies from operating two public companies. Nevertheless, our investment thesis remains intact. Farmers continue to adopt Corteva’s latest hybrids, varieties, and premium crop protection technologies, supporting Corteva’s margin expansion. Meanwhile, the company’s R&D-led innovation, disciplined cost management, and path toward net royalty income should enhance its long-term competitive position. Management has remained steadfast in returning shareholder value, with $500 million of share repurchases in the first half of the year. Finally, Corteva remains opportunistic as exemplified by its partnership with FMC Corporation to expand its product and technology portfolio.
Motorola Solutions, the provider of mission-critical communications and security systems, was one of the largest detractors during the quarter. Shares declined as higher memory and supply chain costs weighed on near-term margin expectations. While these factors affected near-term results, they do not change our long-term thesis. At the core of the company is its land mobile radio business, which provides the communication backbone used by police, fire, and emergency responders – particularly during natural disasters or other high-stress situations when commercial networks may become congested or unavailable. These systems are deeply embedded in public safety agencies, where reliability, control, and resiliency are non-negotiable, and customer relationships are often supported by long-term service agreements, predictable equipment refresh cycles, and decades of trust. Importantly, Motorola is using this installed base to broaden its platform, integrating radios with video security, body-worn cameras, and command center software to help agencies unify voice, video, and data across public safety workflows. The company is also expanding its capabilities through acquisitions such as Silvus Technologies, which adds secure wireless communications technology used in defense, unmanned systems, and other demanding environments. We believe these opportunities, together with a continued shift toward higher-margin software and recurring services, should support improved profitability and FREE cash flow generation over our three- to five-year investment horizon.
Qualcomm, a leading semiconductor and communications technology company, was the largest contributor for the quarter. Shares recovered as management indicated that the inventory adjustments and production constraints resulting from higher memory costs were progressing largely as expected and that handset revenues from Chinese customers were expected to reach a bottom. As we noted last quarter, we believed these headwinds to be cyclical rather than structural and did not alter our long-term investment thesis. The company also continued to make progress on its long-term strategy of evolving from a handset-centric company into a broader provider of connected computing technologies. Automotive revenue reached another record high, while Internet of Things (IoT) and newer businesses such as AI-enabled PCs, industrial applications, and data center computing continue to represent a growing portion of the company and remain central to its long-term diversification strategy. We believe Qualcomm’s technologies will continue to benefit as connectivity expands across devices and AI workloads increasingly extend from the cloud to the edge, supporting Qualcomm’s ability to generate strong levels of FREE cash flow in the long run.
Alphabet, the parent company of Google and YouTube, was a primary contributor during the period. We initiated our position in the first quarter of 2025, when investors were concerned that generative AI tools would fundamentally alter search behavior and erode Google’s advertising franchise. Since then, Alphabet has continued to demonstrate the strength of its ecosystem and the resilience of its core businesses. Google Search has remained strong, with AI-powered features increasing user engagement while supporting advertising growth, and Google Cloud has continued to benefit from robust enterprise demand for AI infrastructure and services. Importantly, Alphabet appears increasingly capable of monetizing these new experiences in a manner consistent with its historical strengths, through advertising, distribution, and integration across a broad user base rather than relying solely on paid subscriptions. YouTube also remains well-positioned to benefit from continued growth in advertising and subscription revenues, including YouTube TV, as consumers continue to shift away from traditional cable. In addition, while we continue to monitor regulatory risk, capital intensity, and changes in search behavior, recent execution reinforces our view that Alphabet remains a high-quality business with durable competitive advantages and multiple avenues for long-term value creation.
Recent Portfolio Activity
Buys
Sells
Autodesk
Atmos Energy
Edwards Lifesciences
Danaher
During the quarter, we sold our positions in Atmos Energy and Danaher and purchased Autodesk and Edwards Lifesciences.
We first invested in Atmos Energy, the largest fully regulated natural gas-only utility in the U.S., in the first quarter of 2022. We were attracted to the company’s strong balance sheet, constructive regulatory environment across its service territories, and significant opportunity to invest in infrastructure modernization projects. During our holding period, Atmos benefited from ongoing system replacement programs, population growth in its key markets, and supportive rate mechanisms that allowed it to earn attractive returns on invested capital. While we continue to view Atmos as a high-quality business, we believe many of the catalysts identified at purchase have either been realized or are well underway. Looking ahead, we expect the company’s growth plan to require a significantly higher level of equity capital than in prior investment cycles. As a result, we elected to exit our position and redeploy the proceeds into Autodesk, which we believe offers a more compelling investment opportunity.
We first invested in Danaher, a company focused on biotechnology, life sciences and diagnostics, in the second quarter of 2016, attracted by its disciplined capital allocation, differentiated operating culture, and consistent FREE cash flow generation. The business is distinguished by a portfolio of market-leading franchises and a high mix of recurring consumables revenue tied to a large installed base. Its differentiated operating culture, anchored by the Danaher Business System (DBS), has historically enabled the company to be a highly effective acquirer, consistently integrating new businesses, expanding margins, and driving strong FREE cash flow generation. Over our decade-long holding period, Danaher successfully transformed itself from a diversified industrial company into a more focused healthcare business. This evolution included the spinoffs of Fortive, Envista, and Veralto, as well as the acquisition and integration of key assets such as Pall, Cepheid, and Cytiva. The company also increased the contribution from recurring revenue and workflow-based solutions embedded in customer operations, which contributed to the durability and predictability of the business.
More recently, as Danaher has shifted further into more complex, innovation-driven end markets, the application of DBS appears to be less differentiated than it was in Danaher’s traditional manufacturing-oriented businesses. Success in these new end markets is increasingly driven by scientific innovation, faster product cycles, and more specialized customer requirements. At the same time, increased scale and a more centralized organizational structure appear to be limiting flexibility at the business unit level, reducing the speed and effectiveness with which opportunities can be pursued. While we continue to view Danaher as a high-quality business, we believe much of our original investment thesis has now been realized, with fewer company-specific catalysts ahead. Accordingly, we elected to exit the position and redeploy the proceeds into what we view as a more attractive opportunity in Edwards Lifesciences.
Autodesk, Inc.
Headquartered in Northern California and founded in 1982, Autodesk produces software that allows companies to design and model their products and/or projects. The company is the global industry standard for computer-aided design in the architecture, engineering, and construction industry (AEC). Autodesk’s millions of subscribers rely on its software to design and model buildings, manufactured products, animated films, and video games. The company’s four segments are AEC (~48% of net sales), its iconic software AutoCAD (~27%), Manufacturing (~20%), and Media and Entertainment (M&E) (~5%).
Autodesk primarily sells its software on a subscription basis, having discontinued perpetual license sales of most standalone products in 2016. As part of the move to subscription licensing, Autodesk replaced its product suite with three streamlined “Industry Collections” focused on AEC, Manufacturing and M&E.
In recent years, the AEC industry has increasingly sought to resolve the inefficiencies that arise when many parties are needed to complete a building project. Autodesk has been at the cutting edge of enabling improvement through innovation and promoting the use of open standards, or open building information modeling (BIM), which allows for all relevant building data to be processed virtually in a 3D model and shared across stakeholders. Importantly, Autodesk’s leadership in ensuring the interoperability of its software with that of competitors increases collaboration and productivity among architects, engineers and contractors—an attractive value proposition for its customers.
High-Quality Business
Some of the quality characteristics we have identified for Autodesk include:
Brand power, as AutoCAD is one of the most recognizable products in the industry;
Leading market share in AEC software, where Autodesk’s BIM platform has reinforced its position as the industry standard;
Large and loyal installed base of over six million users across more than 180 countries;
Stable business model with a high degree of recurring revenue (97% of total) and significant FREE cash flow generation; and
Substantial switching costs and pricing power that stem from its advanced solutions, network effects and the time (often many years) it requires for a professional to master Autodesk software.
Attractive Valuation
We believe shares of Autodesk are attractively valued given our estimates of normalized earnings. In our view, the market underappreciates Autodesk’s ability to sustain double-digit revenue growth while maintaining high levels of profitability, with operating margins of approximately 40%. Supported by pricing initiatives, strong customer retention and a highly recurring revenue model, we believe the shares do not fully reflect the company’s long-term earnings power and ability to generate FREE cash flow.
Compelling Catalysts
Catalysts we have identified for Autodesk, which we believe will cause its stock price to appreciate over our three- to five-year investment horizon, include:
Expanding adoption of BIM, 3D modeling and construction coordination tools as customers increasingly seek to improve collaboration and productivity across complex projects, driving greater utilization of Autodesk’s software portfolio;
Benefits from its multi-year go-to-market modernization initiative, including greater automation of renewals through direct billing and auto-renew capabilities, allowing sales resources to focus on growth opportunities rather than maintenance activities;
Increased monetization through tiered offerings and consumption-based pricing initiatives, which should support higher average selling prices over time; and
Continued market share gains across its core AEC and Manufacturing software businesses.
Edwards Lifesciences Corporation
Headquartered in Irvine, California, Edwards Lifesciences is a global leader in structural heart disease therapies, developing and commercializing medical devices used to treat advanced cardiovascular conditions. The company is best known for its leadership in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), a minimally invasive procedure that allows physicians to replace diseased heart valves without open-heart surgery. By reducing the invasiveness, recovery time and risk associated with traditional surgical valve replacement, TAVR has significantly expanded the number of patients eligible for treatment and accelerated adoption across the structural heart market.
We have followed Edwards for many years as both a leading structural heart company and a competitor to Medtronic’s CoreValve platform. Over the last decade, Edwards effectively “bet the company” on TAVR technology and successfully established its Sapien platform as one of the leading transcatheter heart valve systems globally while maintaining a meaningful presence in surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Today, TAVR represents the core of Edwards’ business and is supported by a large global installed base, extensive physician training and extensive long-term clinical evidence, reinforcing its position as a standard of care for aortic stenosis.
Beyond TAVR, Edwards is expanding into transcatheter mitral and tricuspid therapies (TMTT), which represent a significantly larger but more underpenetrated market opportunity. The company is also investing in adjacent cardiovascular technologies, supported by continued investment in research and development, targeted acquisitions, and substantial FREE cash flow generation.
High-Quality Business
Some of the quality characteristics we have identified for Edwards Lifesciences include:
Leadership in transcatheter heart valve technologies, particularly TAVR, where the company’s Sapien platform is widely regarded as a gold standard among physicians;
High barriers to entry, driven by clinical data, physician training requirements and regulatory approvals, which create meaningful switching costs once devices are adopted in practice;
A strong innovation-driven culture, supported by consistent investment in R&D and a track record of developing next-generation cardiovascular therapies; and
A focused strategy centered on structural heart disease, allowing for deep expertise and a comprehensive product portfolio across aortic, mitral and tricuspid valve therapies.
Attractive Valuation
While the TAVR market is more developed, we believe both the continued expansion of this franchise and the scaling contribution from newer mitral and tricuspid therapies are not fully reflected in the current stock price. As these businesses continue to scale and adoption broadens, we expect continued improvement in operating performance and FREE cash flow generation over our investment horizon.
Compelling Catalysts
Catalysts we have identified for Edwards Lifesciences, which we believe will cause its stock price to appreciate over our three- to five-year investment horizon, include:
Higher TAVR procedure volumes, driven by increasing penetration across symptomatic and asymptomatic patient populations, ongoing clinical data supporting use in additional indications, expanding physician adoption, and continued share gains relative to surgical valve replacement surgery (SAVR);
Broader adoption of TMTT valve therapies, which we believe represent a market opportunity significantly larger than TAVR over time;
Expansion into adjacent cardiovascular technologies, including heart failure monitoring and treatment, supported by internal development and targeted acquisitions; and
Continued deployment of substantial FREE cash flow into internal innovation, targeted acquisitions and shareholder returns, supported by a strong balance sheet and meaningful net cash position.
Conclusion
We believe markets are extrapolating the earnings of today’s AI infrastructure beneficiaries far into the future and treating Transient Quality as though it were durable. While artificial intelligence and its enabling technologies are undoubtedly important, history suggests that no investment theme enjoys an uninterrupted run forever. Capital eventually chases diminishing returns, valuations become overly extended, and investors begin to rediscover quality businesses outside the market’s narrow focus. Cycles don’t end because the underlying technology disappears—they end because expectations and prices become disconnected from what is normal.
We are not dismissing AI, nor are we waiting passively for the market to change. We are using this dislocation to upgrade the portfolio toward what we believe to be Durable Quality businesses, purchased at valuations that better reflect normalized fundamentals. In periods like this, discipline can feel uncomfortable, but history suggests that prices and fundamentals eventually reconnect. Our objective is to ensure that when they do, our clients own businesses with the durability, pricing power, and compounding potential to create value well beyond the current cycle.
Disclosures
The opinions expressed herein are those of Aristotle Capital Management, LLC (Aristotle Capital) and are subject to change without notice. Past performance is not a guarantee or indicator of future results. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. You should not assume that any of the securities transactions, sectors or holdings discussed in this report were or will be profitable, or that recommendations Aristotle Capital makes in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of the securities listed in this report. The portfolio characteristics shown relate to the Aristotle Value Equity strategy. Not every client’s account will have these characteristics. Aristotle Capital reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs. There is no assurance that any securities discussed herein will remain in an account’s portfolio at the time you receive this report or that securities sold have not been repurchased. The securities discussed may not represent an account’s entire portfolio and, in the aggregate, may represent only a small percentage of an account’s portfolio holdings. The performance attribution presented is of a representative account from Aristotle Capital’s Value Equity Strategy. The representative account is a discretionary client account which was chosen to most closely reflect the investment style of the strategy. The criteria used for representative account selection is based on the account’s period of time under management and its similarity of holdings in relation to the strategy. Recommendations made in the last 12 months are available upon request.
Composite returns are presented pure gross and net of the maximum wrap fee and include the reinvestment of all income. Pure gross returns do not reflect the deduction of any trading costs or other fees and are supplemental to the net returns. Net returns are calculated by subtracting the highest applicable wrap/SMA fee, which includes trading costs and custodial fees, from the pure gross composite return. (From inception to 12/31/2015, the highest applicable wrap/SMA fee is 3.00% on an annual basis, or 0.75% quarterly. From 1/1/2016 to 12/31/2023, the highest applicable wrap/SMA fee is 2.00% on an annual basis, or 0.50% quarterly and 0.17% monthly from 1/1/2024 to present.)
All investments carry a certain degree of risk, including the possible loss of principal. Investments are also subject to political, market, currency and regulatory risks or economic developments. International investments involve special risks that may in particular cause a loss in principal, including currency fluctuation, lower liquidity, different accounting methods and economic and political systems, and higher transaction costs. These risks typically are greater in emerging markets. While Large-capitalization companies may have more stable prices than smaller, less established companies, they are still subject to equity securities risk. In addition, large-capitalization equity security prices may not rise as much as prices of equity securities of small-capitalization companies. Securities of small- and medium-sized companies tend to have a shorter history of operations and be more volatile and less liquid. Value stocks can perform differently from the market as a whole and other types of stocks. The material is provided for informational and/or educational purposes only and is not intended to be and should not be construed as investment, legal or tax advice and/or a legal opinion. Investors should consult their financial and tax adviser before making investments. The opinions referenced are as of the date of publication, may be modified due to changes in the market or economic conditions, and may not necessarily come to pass. Information and data presented has been developed internally and/or obtained from sources believed to be reliable. Aristotle Capital does not guarantee the accuracy, adequacy or completeness of such information.
Aristotle Capital Management, LLC is an independent registered investment adviser under the Advisers Act of 1940, as amended. Registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training. More information about Aristotle Capital, including our investment strategies, fees and objectives, can be found in our ADV Part 2, which is available upon request. ACM-2607-107
Performance Disclosures
Sources: CAPS CompositeHubTM, Russell Investments, Standard & Poor’s
Past performance is not indicative of future results. The information provided should not be considered financial advice or a recommendation to purchase or sell any particular security or product. Performance results for periods greater than one year have been annualized.
The Aristotle Value Equity WM Composite has an inception date of 10/1/1979. As of 1/1/2024, the Composite was renamed from the Value Equity Wrap Composite and the inception date was updated to 1/1/2012. This update was implemented to align the start date of the composite track record with the start date of the current decision maker. Performance achieved by the firm prior to that date is available upon request.
Composite returns are presented pure gross and net of the maximum wrap fee and include the reinvestment of all income. Pure gross returns do not reflect the deduction of any trading costs or other fees and are supplemental to the net returns. Net returns are calculated by subtracting the highest applicable wrap/SMA fee, which includes trading costs and custodial fees, from the pure gross composite return. (From inception to 12/31/2015, the highest applicable wrap/SMA fee is 3.00% on an annual basis, or 0.75% quarterly. From 1/1/2016 to 12/31/2023, the highest applicable wrap/SMA fee is 2.00% on an annual basis, or 0.50% quarterly and 0.17% monthly from 1/1/2024 to present.)
Index Disclosures
The Russell 1000® Value Index measures the performance of the large cap value segment of the U.S. equity universe. It includes those Russell 1000 Index companies with lower price-to-book ratios and lower expected growth values. The S&P 500® Index is the Standard & Poor’s Composite Index of 500 stocks and is a widely recognized, unmanaged index of common stock prices. The S&P 500 Equal Weight Index is designed to be the size-neutral version of the S&P 500. It includes the same constituents as the cap-weighted S&P 500, but each company in the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index is allocated the same weight at each quarterly rebalance. The Russell 1000® Growth Index measures the performance of the large cap growth segment of the U.S. equity universe. It includes those Russell 1000 companies with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values. The Russell 2000® Index measures the performance of the small cap segment of the U.S. equity universe. The Russell 2000 Index is a subset of the Russell 3000® Index representing approximately 10% of the total market capitalization of that index. It includes approximately 2,000 of the smallest securities based on a combination of their market cap and current index membership. The Dow Jones Industrial Average® is a price-weighted measure of 30 U.S. blue-chip companies. The Index covers all industries except transportation and utilities. The NASDAQ Composite Index measures all NASDAQ domestic and international based common type stocks listed on The NASDAQ Stock Market. The NASDAQ Composite includes over 3,000 companies, more than most other stock market indexes. The Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index is an unmanaged index of domestic investment grade bonds, including corporate, government and mortgage-backed securities. The WTI Crude Oil Index is a major trading classification of sweet light crude oil that serves as a major benchmark price for oil consumed in the United States. The 3-Month U.S. Treasury Bill is a short-term debt obligation backed by the U.S. Treasury Department with a maturity of three months. The volatility (beta) of the Composite may be greater or less than its respective benchmarks. It is not possible to invest directly in these indices.
The opinions expressed herein are those of Aristotle Capital and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. Aristotle Capital reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs. All investments carry a certain degree of risk, including the possible loss of principal. Investments are also subject to political, market, currency and regulatory risks or economic developments. International investments involve special risks that may in particular cause a loss in principal, including currency fluctuation, lower liquidity, different accounting methods and economic and political systems, and higher transaction costs. These risks typically are greater in emerging markets. While Large-capitalization companies may have more stable prices than smaller, less established companies, they are still subject to equity securities risk. In addition, large capitalization equity security prices may not rise as much as prices of equity securities of small-capitalization companies. Securities of small- and medium-sized companies tend to have a shorter history of operations, be more volatile and less liquid. Value stocks can perform differently from the market as a whole and other types of stocks. The material is provided for informational and/or educational purposes only and is not intended to be and should not be construed as investment, legal or tax advice and/ or a legal opinion. Investors should consult their financial and tax adviser before making investments. The opinions referenced are as of the date of publication, may be modified due to changes in the market or economic conditions, and may not necessarily come to pass. Information and data presented has been developed internally and/or obtained from sources believed to be reliable. Aristotle Capital does not guarantee the accuracy, adequacy or completeness of such information. The MSCI USA Momentum Index is designed to measure the performance of large- and mid-cap U.S. stocks exhibiting relatively strong price momentum, while considering liquidity, investability, and turnover constraints. It is not possible to invest directly in the index.
Aristotle Capital Management, LLC (Aristotle Capital) is an independent investment adviser registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended. Registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training. More information about Aristotle Capital, including our investment strategies, fees and objectives, can be found in our Form ADV Part 2, which is available upon request. ACM-2607-39
For more on International Equity, access the latest resources.
In The Bigger Picture: Thoughtful Answers, Aristotle Atlantic’s Owen Fitzpatrick, CFA, discusses the investment opportunities emerging at the intersection of robotics, artificial intelligence, and next-generation computing.
Owen Fitzpatrick, CFA Managing Director, Lead Portfolio Manager
Listen to the segment below.
About Aristotle Atlantic Aristotle Atlantic Partners, LLC is a privately owned, registered investment advisor that specializes in equity portfolio management for institutional and individual clients worldwide. We are one of four independent investment teams which collectively operate under a unified platform known as Aristotle. Our mission is to add value with active portfolio management to help our clients reach their long-term financial goals.
(All MSCI index returns are shown net and in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.)
Markets Review
Sources: CAPS CompositeHubTM, Bloomberg Past performance is not indicative of future results. Aristotle International Equity ADR WM Composite returns are presented pure gross and net of the maximum wrap fee and include the reinvestment of all income. Pure gross returns do not reflect the deduction of any trading costs or other fees and are supplemental to the net returns. Net returns are calculated by subtracting the highest applicable wrap/SMA fee, which includes trading costs and custodial fees, from the pure gross composite return (From inception to 12/31/2015, the highest applicable wrap/SMA fee is 3.00% on an annual basis, or 0.75% quarterly. From 1/1/2016 to 12/31/2023, the highest applicable wrap/SMA fee is 2.00% on an annual basis, or 0.50% quarterly and 0.17% monthly from 1/1/2024 to present.) Please see important disclosures at the end of this document.
Global equity markets rallied to record highs in the second quarter, with the MSCI ACWI Index rising 14.93% during the period. Global fixed income markets also advanced, as the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond Index increased 0.87%. From a style perspective, growth stocks outperformed value, with the MSCI ACWI Growth Index exceeding the MSCI ACWI Value Index by 9.21%.
The MSCI EAFE Index rose 10.82% during the period, while the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index climbed 14.49%. Within the MSCI EAFE Index, Europe & Middle East was the strongest performer, while the U.K. lagged. On a sector basis, nine out of the eleven sectors within the MSCI EAFE Index posted positive returns, with Information Technology, Financials, and Industrials performing the best. Conversely, Energy, Communication Services, and Utilities lagged.
Geopolitics remained a source of volatility, particularly in the Middle East, where the ongoing conflict between the U.S. and Iran affected energy markets, shipping routes, and investor sentiment. During the quarter, intermittent military strikes and recurring threats to commercial shipping in and around the Strait of Hormuz kept investors focused on the potential for disruptions to global energy supply. Late in the period, a temporary ceasefire and negotiations briefly eased these concerns. However, developments shortly after quarter-end, including renewed hostilities and President Trump’s statement that the ceasefire was over, underscored the fragility of the situation and the potential for renewed volatility in energy markets.
As the two sides worked toward peace, global economies continued to feel the negative impact of the war. Due to the inflationary shock from the conflict, the European Central Bank raised interest rates during the quarter; however, concerns about stagflation increased on news that real GDP growth in the eurozone had contracted versus the previous quarter. Meanwhile, the Bank of England and U.S. Federal Reserve kept rates steady, despite elevated inflation in both countries. In Asia, the Bank of Japan raised rates, and South Korea’s government passed a $17.7 billion emergency supplementary budget to offset rising oil prices.
Despite the fragile global economic backdrop, earnings in Europe and Asia remained robust, supported by continued demand tied to AI infrastructure and strength in select commodity-linked industries. Beneath the surface, market leadership reflected a more risk-on environment globally, with high-beta stocks generally outperforming low-beta stocks. Companies tied to the buildout of AI-related infrastructure, including semiconductors, memory, power equipment, and other data center suppliers, were among the strongest performers, while more defensive and lower-volatility areas generally lagged.
Performance and Attribution Summary
For the second quarter of 2026, Aristotle Capital’s International Equity ADR WM Composite posted a total return of 7.55% pure gross of fees (7.03% net of fees), underperforming the MSCI EAFE Index, which returned 10.82%, and the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index, which returned 14.49%. Please refer to the table below for detailed performance.
Performance (%)
2Q26
YTD
1 Year
3 Years
5 Years
10 Years
Since Inception*
International Equity ADR WM Composite (pure gross)
7.55
3.90
12.67
13.38
7.18
9.22
8.79
International Equity ADR WM Composite (net)
7.03
2.88
10.47
11.17
5.06
7.06
6.45
MSCI EAFE Index (net)
10.82
9.44
20.23
16.44
9.05
9.66
8.59
MSCI ACWI ex USA Index (net)
14.49
13.68
27.66
18.82
8.79
9.93
8.24
*The inception date for the International Equity ADR WM Composite is 7/1/2012. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Aristotle International Equity ADR WM Composite returns are presented pure gross and net of the maximum wrap fee and include the reinvestment of all income. Pure gross returns do not reflect the deduction of any trading costs or other fees and are supplemental to the net returns. Net returns are calculated by subtracting the highest applicable wrap/SMA fee, which includes trading costs and custodial fees, from the pure gross composite return. (From inception to 12/31/2015, the highest applicable wrap/SMA fee is 3.00% on an annual basis, or 0.75% quarterly. From 1/1/2016 to 12/31/2023, the highest applicable wrap/SMA fee is 2.00% on an annual basis, or 0.50% quarterly and 0.17% monthly from 1/1/2024 to present.) Please see important disclosures at the end of this document.
Source: FactSet Past performance is not indicative of future results. Sector attribution shows how much of a portfolio’s overall return is directly attributable to stock selection and asset allocation decisions within the portfolio, highlighting which sectors contributed or detracted to the total return. Attribution includes the reinvestment of income. Attribution is presented gross of fees and does not include the deduction of all fees and expenses that a client or investor has paid or would have paid. Please refer to the pure gross and net composite returns included within to understand the overall impact of fees.
From a sector perspective, the portfolio’s underperformance relative to the MSCI EAFE Index can be attributed to security selection and allocation effects. Security selection and an underweight in Information Technology, as well as security selection in Health Care, detracted most from the portfolio’s relative performance. Conversely, security selection in Industrials, Materials, and Energy contributed to relative returns.
Regionally, both security selection and allocation effects were responsible for the portfolio’s underperformance. Security selection in Europe & Middle East and exposure to Canada detracted most from relative performance, while exposure to the U.S. and an underweight in the U.K. contributed.
Contributors and Detractors for 2Q 2026
Relative Contributors
Relative Detractors
Erste Group Bank
Pan Pacific International
ING Groep
Accenture
Fast Retailing
Cameco
Techtronic Industries
Wal-Mart de Mexico
Credicorp
Munich Reinsurance
Relative contributors and detractors are based on attribution total effect and exclude benchmark securities not held in the portfolio.
Pan Pacific International Holdings, the Japanese discount retailer, was the largest detractor during the period. Shares declined as investors weighed the company’s acquisition of Tokyo metropolitan supermarket chain Olympic Group, the potential upfront costs associated with its new Robin Hood format, and broader concerns about gross margin sustainability in a competitive retail environment. Management also announced leadership changes at Gelson’s, its California-based premium grocery subsidiary, as the business works to improve operating performance amid a more challenging consumer backdrop. Nevertheless, we believe Pan Pacific’s long-term investment case remains intact. The company continues to benefit from differentiated store formats, decentralized merchandising, strong value positioning, as well as management’s experience improving acquired retail assets. Same-store sales in the discount store business remain strong, while private-label expansion, UNY margin improvement, and new concepts such as Robin Hood and Rail-side Donki extend the company’s domestic growth runway. We remain confident that Pan Pacific’s distinctive retail culture and disciplined execution position it well for long-term growth.
Accenture, the global provider of IT consulting and technology services, was a primary detractor during the quarter. Shares declined as investors reacted to weaker bookings, a lower revenue outlook, continued pressure on discretionary IT spending, and disruptions tied to the conflict in the Middle East, while also debating whether generative AI could reduce demand for traditional consulting services. Despite these near-term headwinds, Accenture remains a premier enterprise transformation partner, with advantages rooted in scale, deep industry expertise, broad technology partnerships, and long-standing client relationships. Management continued to highlight growing demand for large-scale AI reinvention programs as clients move from experimentation to production, with AI increasingly embedded in broader managed services contracts. The company also expanded its capabilities through the acquisitions of Dragos, runZero, and NetRise, building a leading operational technology cybersecurity platform with more software- and platform-oriented revenue streams. In addition, Accenture Edge, supported by Microsoft and Avanade, extends the company’s reach into the underpenetrated mid-market. We believe these initiatives reinforce Accenture’s ability to adapt to technology shifts and sustain its long-term competitive position.
Fast Retailing, the Japanese multinational apparel retailer and owner of UNIQLO, was a leading contributor during the quarter.Shares rose sharply after the company reported another strong quarter and raised full-year revenue and profit guidance, as strength across UNIQLO’s global business more than offset headwinds from higher sourcing costs and softer inbound tourism in Japan. Results were supported by continued demand for year-round LifeWear products, successful flagship store execution, operating efficiency gains, and improving performance in Greater China—where the company’s shift toward more localized, independent store management appears to be gaining traction. The quarter also reinforced several aspects of our quality thesis. UNIQLO’s differentiated model, focused on functional, high-quality everyday apparel at attractive prices, continues to benefit from scale, disciplined SKU management, long-standing supplier partnerships, and strong brand equity. These advantages have allowed the company to generate attractive returns while expanding globally from a Japanese retailer into one of the world’s leading apparel platforms. The results also demonstrated progress against catalysts we have identified, including the China turnaround, further global expansion of UNIQLO (particularly in North America and Europe) and improving execution at GU. We were also encouraged by evidence that the company’s U.S. success is being driven not simply by store openings, but by deeper brand building, localized management, and investment in training and culture, which may support a longer runway for profitable growth.
Techtronic Industries, the Hong Kong-based manufacturer of power tools, was a primary contributor during the period.We initiated our investment in the first quarter of 2026, attracted to the company’s Milwaukee and Ryobi brands, culture of product innovation, and battery ecosystems that create loyalty and repeat purchases across hundreds of compatible tools. Recent results highlight the company’s progress, with Milwaukee driving revenue growth through deeper penetration of professional trades, new product introductions, and expansion into additional geographies, while Ryobi remains a leading DIY platform with opportunities to expand beyond its core markets. The company has also improved the quality of its earnings base by shifting further toward Milwaukee, exiting lower-return areas such as HART and rationalizing underperforming product lines. Importantly, the business is increasingly broader than residential repair and remodel demand. Milwaukee is becoming embedded in the workflows of mechanical, electrical, and plumbing contractors working on data centers, grid infrastructure, and other complex non-residential projects, where productivity, safety, and uptime are critical. This is a natural extension of Techtronic’s strategy: expand the Milwaukee ecosystem around the jobsite, then deepen customer loyalty through batteries, accessories, personal protective equipment, storage, and service support that can make the platform more valuable over time.
Recent Portfolio Activity
Buys
Sells
Magnum Ice Cream
Unilever
During the quarter, we sold our position in Unilever and invested in Magnum Ice Cream.
We first invested in Unilever, the global consumer staples company, in the second quarter of 2013. We have long been attracted to the company’s broad portfolio of leading personal care and food brands (such as Dove, Knorr, and Axe), global scale, significant emerging markets exposure, and strong position across everyday use categories. Over our more than decade-long holding period, Unilever strengthened and simplified its portfolio, divesting lower-growth food assets, improving efficiency, increasing focus behind its largest brands, and shifting the business toward faster-growing, higher-margin beauty, wellbeing, personal care, and home care categories. More recently, the separation of the ice cream business and continued reshaping of the food portfolio have further narrowed Unilever’s strategic focus. While we continue to view the remaining Unilever franchise as high quality, we believe the more compelling opportunity now resides in the independent ice cream business, where dedicated management and a category-specific strategy should provide a clearer path to value creation. We therefore elected to exit Unilever and redeploy the proceeds into Magnum Ice Cream, discussed in greater detail below.
The Magnum Ice Cream Company N.V.
Headquartered in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, Magnum Ice Cream is the world’s largest dedicated ice cream manufacturer. The company was formed following its separation from Unilever in 2025 and owns a portfolio of leading global, regional, and local brands, including Magnum, Ben & Jerry’s, Cornetto, Wall’s, Breyers, Klondike, Popsicle, Talenti, and Yasso. Collectively, these brands generate more than €8 billion in annual revenue, are sold across roughly 80 countries, and span a wide range of price points, formats, and consumption occasions.
Magnum sells products through both at-home and away-from-home channels. The at-home business includes pints, tubs, and multipacks sold through grocery, club, and other retail stores, while the away-from-home business consists primarily of single-serve products sold through a global network of approximately three million freezer cabinets. Supporting this distribution model is one of the most extensive cold-chain networks in the consumer staples industry, including more than 30 manufacturing facilities, 200 warehouses, and over 2,000 distributors. Following its separation from Unilever, Magnum is now focused exclusively on frozen desserts, allowing management to optimize sales, marketing, innovation, and supply chain decisions around the unique dynamics of the ice cream category.
High-Quality Business
Some of the quality characteristics we have identified for Magnum include:
The global market leader in ice cream, with approximately 21% market share and ownership of four of the five largest ice cream brands worldwide;
A portfolio of iconic brands that benefit from strong consumer recognition, pricing power and customer loyalty;
A premium-oriented portfolio, with approximately 80% of revenue generated from premium products and pricing that is roughly 2.5x higher per kilogram than private label competitors;
A difficult-to-replicate global cold-chain distribution network, including three million freezer cabinets that improve product availability and support impulse purchases in the away-from-home channel; and
Strong returns on invested capital, supported by leading market positions, premium products, and significant scale advantages across procurement, manufacturing, and distribution.
Attractive Valuation
Historically, the ice cream business operated within Unilever’s broader portfolio, where it lacked a dedicated sales force and was supported by a supply chain optimized for a diverse mix of consumer products rather than the unique requirements of frozen desserts. This contributed to lower factory utilization, underinvestment in certain markets, and suboptimal retailer negotiations. In addition, one-time separation costs and transitional service agreements have weighed on current profitability following the company’s separation from Unilever.
At approximately 11x our estimate of normalized earnings, we believe shares do not fully reflect Magnum’s leading global market position, premium brand portfolio, and ability to generate attractive returns on invested capital.
Compelling Catalysts
Catalysts we have identified for Magnum, which we believe will cause its stock price to appreciate over our three- to five-year investment horizon, include:
Expansion of its global freezer cabinet fleet, improving product availability, and supporting market share gains in the attractive away-from-home channel;
Continued premiumization of its portfolio through innovation, new product formats, and increased penetration of higher-value brands such as Magnum, Ben & Jerry’s, and Yasso;
Expansion into new formats, including Yasso handhelds, Ben & Jerry’s handhelds, and Magnum BonBons, which should increase consumption occasions and support mix improvement;
Supply chain optimization initiatives, including a transition toward more localized manufacturing and distribution, which should improve operating margins and capacity utilization;
Increased focus and investment following its separation from Unilever, including a dedicated sales force, category-specific retailer negotiations, and a commercial strategy designed specifically for frozen desserts; and
Market share recovery opportunities in key geographies, including India, where Magnum acquired a majority stake in Kwality Wall’s. The business had previously lost meaningful share due to poor management, insufficient manufacturing and distribution investment, pricing missteps, and the removal of dairy from certain products.
Conclusion
As we look ahead, the global backdrop remains complex. Geopolitical developments, central bank decisions and changes in investor risk appetite can all influence returns over shorter periods, but these factors are difficult to forecast with consistency. Rather than position the portfolio around macro outcomes, we continue to focus on the businesses we own and the actions management teams are taking to increase value over time.
Our investment process centers on the three pillars of Quality, Valuation and Catalysts. We seek companies with strong competitive positions, capable management teams, financial resilience and identifiable opportunities to improve profitability and FREE cash flow. While markets can move quickly from one theme to the next, we believe owning high-quality businesses at attractive valuations remains the best way to create value for clients over the long term.
Disclosures
The opinions expressed herein are those of Aristotle Capital Management, LLC (Aristotle Capital) and are subject to change without notice. Past performance is not a guarantee or indicator of future results. This material is not financial advice or an offer to buy or sell any product. You should not assume that any of the securities transactions, sectors or holdings discussed in this report were or will be profitable, or that recommendations Aristotle Capital makes in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of the securities listed in this report. The portfolio characteristics shown relate to the Aristotle International Equity ADR strategy. Not every client’s account will have these characteristics. Aristotle Capital reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs. There is no assurance that any securities discussed herein will remain in an account’s portfolio at the time you receive this report or that securities sold have not been repurchased. The securities discussed may not represent an account’s entire portfolio and, in the aggregate, may represent only a small percentage of an account’s portfolio holdings. The performance attribution presented is of a representative account from Aristotle Capital’s International Equity ADR strategy. The representative account is a discretionary client account which was chosen to most closely reflect the investment style of the strategy. The criteria used for representative account selection is based on the account’s period of time under management and its similarity of holdings in relation to the strategy. Recommendations made in the last 12 months are available upon request.
Composite returns are presented pure gross and net of the maximum wrap fee and include the reinvestment of all income. Pure gross returns do not reflect the deduction of any trading costs or other fees and are supplemental to the net returns. Net returns are calculated by subtracting the highest applicable wrap/SMA fee, which includes trading costs and custodial fees, from the pure gross composite return. (From inception to 12/31/2015, the highest applicable wrap/SMA fee is 3.00% on an annual basis, or 0.75% quarterly. From 1/1/2016 to 12/31/2023, the highest applicable wrap/SMA fee is 2.00% on an annual basis, or 0.50% quarterly and 0.17% monthly from 1/1/2024 to present.)
All investments carry a certain degree of risk, including the possible loss of principal. Investments are also subject to political, market, currency and regulatory risks or economic developments. International investments involve special risks that may in particular cause a loss in principal, including currency fluctuation, lower liquidity, different accounting methods and economic and political systems, and higher transaction costs. These risks typically are greater in emerging markets. While Large-capitalization companies may have more stable prices than smaller, less established companies, they are still subject to equity securities risk. In addition, large-capitalization equity security prices may not rise as much as prices of equity securities of small-capitalization companies. Securities of small- and medium-sized companies tend to have a shorter history of operations and be more volatile and less liquid. Value stocks can perform differently from the market as a whole and other types of stocks. The material is provided for informational and/or educational purposes only and is not intended to be and should not be construed as investment, legal or tax advice and/or a legal opinion. Investors should consult their financial and tax adviser before making investments. The opinions referenced are as of the date of publication, may be modified due to changes in the market or economic conditions, and may not necessarily come to pass. Information and data presented has been developed internally and/or obtained from sources believed to be reliable. Aristotle Capital does not guarantee the accuracy, adequacy or completeness of such information.
Aristotle Capital Management, LLC is an independent registered investment adviser under the Advisers Act of 1940, as amended. Registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training. More information about Aristotle Capital, including our investment strategies, fees and objectives, can be found in our Form ADV Part 2, which is available upon request. ACM-2607-72
Performance Disclosures
Sources: CAPS CompositeHubTM, MSCI
Past performance is not indicative of future results. The information provided should not be considered financial advice or a recommendation to purchase or sell any particular security or product. Performance results for periods greater than one year have been annualized.
The Aristotle International Equity ADR WM Composite has an inception date of 7/1/2012. As of 1/1/2024, the Composite was renamed from the International Equity ADR Wrap Composite.
Composite returns are presented pure gross and net of the maximum wrap fee and include the reinvestment of all income. Pure gross returns do not reflect the deduction of any trading costs or other fees and are supplemental to the net returns. Net returns are calculated by subtracting the highest applicable wrap/SMA fee, which includes trading costs and custodial fees, from the pure gross composite return. (From inception to 12/31/2015, the highest applicable wrap/SMA fee is 3.00% on an annual basis, or 0.75% quarterly. From 1/1/2016 to 12/31/2023, the highest applicable wrap/SMA fee is 2.00% on an annual basis, or 0.50% quarterly and 0.17% monthly from 1/1/2024 to present.)
Index Disclosures
The MSCI EAFE Index (Europe, Australasia, Far East) is an equity index which captures large and mid cap representation across Developed Markets (DM) countries around the world, excluding the US and Canada. The index covers approximately 85% of the free float-adjusted market capitalization in each country. The MSCI ACWI Index captures large and mid cap representation across Developed Markets (DM) and Emerging Markets (EM) countries. The index covers approximately 85% of the global investable equity opportunity set. The MSCI ACWI ex USA Index captures large and mid cap representation across Developed Markets (DM) countries (excluding the US) and Emerging Markets (EM) countries. The index covers approximately 85% of the global equity opportunity set outside the United States. The MSCI Emerging Markets Index captures large and mid cap representation across Emerging Markets countries. The index covers approximately 85% of the free float-adjusted market capitalization in each country. The MSCI ACWI Value Index captures large and mid cap securities exhibiting overall value style characteristics across Developed Markets (DM) and Emerging Markets (EM) countries. The S&P 500 Index is the Standard & Poor’s Composite Index and is a widely recognized, unmanaged index of common stock prices. It is market cap weighted and includes 500 leading companies, capturing approximately 80% coverage of available market capitalization. The Brent Crude Oil Index is a major trading classification of sweet light crude oil that serves as a major benchmark price for purchases of oil worldwide. The MSCI Japan Index is designed to measure the performance of the large and mid-cap segments of the Japanese market. With approximately 200 constituents, the Index covers approximately 85% of the free float-adjusted market capitalization in Japan. The Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond Index is a flagship measure of global investment grade debt from 28 local currency markets. This multi-currency benchmark includes treasury, government-related, corporate and securitized fixed-rate bonds from both developed and emerging markets issuers. The MSCI United Kingdom Index is designed to measure the performance of the large and mid-cap segments of the U.K. market. With nearly 100 constituents, the Index covers approximately 85% of the free float-adjusted market capitalization in the United Kingdom. The MSCI Europe Index captures large and mid cap representation across Developed Markets (DM) countries in Europe. The Index covers approximately 85% of the free float-adjusted market capitalization across the European Developed Markets equity universe. These indexes have been selected as the benchmarks and are used for comparison purposes only. The volatility (beta) of the Composite may be greater or less than the respective benchmarks. It is not possible to invest directly in these indexes.
(All MSCI index returns are shown net and in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.)
Markets Review
Sources: CAPS CompositeHubTM, Bloomberg Past performance is not indicative of future results. Aristotle Global Equity WM Composite returns are presented pure gross and net of maximum wrap fee and include the reinvestment of income. Pure gross returns do not reflect the deduction of any trading costs or other fees and are supplemental to the net returns. Net returns are calculated by subtracting the highest applicable wrap/SMA fee, which includes trading costs and custodial fees, from the pure gross composite return. The highest applicable wrap/SMA fee is 2.00% on an annual basis, or 0.50% quarterly from inception to 12/31/2023 and 0.17% monthly from 1/1/2024 to present. Please see important disclosures at the end of this document.
Global equity markets rallied to record highs in the second quarter, with the MSCI ACWI Index rising 14.93% during the period. Global fixed income markets also advanced, as the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond Index increased 0.87%. From a style perspective, growth stocks outperformed value, with the MSCI ACWI Growth Index exceeding the MSCI ACWI Value Index by 9.21%.
Performance across global equity markets was broadly positive during the period, led by gains in Asia/Pacific ex-Japan and North America, while Latin America and Africa/Middle East lagged. On a sector basis, ten out of the eleven sectors within the MSCI ACWI Index advanced, led by Information Technology, Industrials, and Financials. Alternatively, Energy, Materials, and Utilities were the worst performers.
Geopolitics remained a source of volatility, particularly in the Middle East, where the ongoing conflict between the U.S. and Iran affected energy markets, shipping routes, and investor sentiment. During the quarter, intermittent military strikes and recurring threats to commercial shipping in and around the Strait of Hormuz kept investors focused on the potential for disruptions to global energy supply. Late in the period, a temporary ceasefire and negotiations briefly eased these concerns. However, developments shortly after quarter-end, including renewed hostilities and President Trump’s statement that the ceasefire was over, underscored the fragility of the situation and the potential for renewed volatility in energy markets.
As the two sides worked toward peace, global economies continued to feel the negative impact of the war. Due to the inflationary shock from the conflict, the European Central Bank raised interest rates during the quarter; however, concerns about stagflation increased on news that real GDP growth in the eurozone had contracted versus the previous quarter. Meanwhile, the Bank of England and U.S. Federal Reserve kept rates steady, despite elevated inflation in both countries. In Asia, the Bank of Japan raised rates, and South Korea’s government passed a $17.7 billion emergency supplementary budget to offset rising oil prices.
Despite the fragile global economic backdrop, earnings in Europe and Asia remained robust, supported by continued demand tied to AI infrastructure and strength in select commodity-linked industries. Beneath the surface, market leadership reflected a more risk-on environment globally, with high-beta stocks generally outperforming low-beta stocks. Companies tied to the buildout of AI-related infrastructure, including semiconductors, memory, power equipment, and other data center suppliers, were among the strongest performers, while more defensive and lower-volatility areas generally lagged.
Performance and Attribution Summary
For the second quarter of 2026, Aristotle Capital’s Global Equity WM Composite posted a total return of 6.92% pure gross of fees (6.40% net of fees), underperforming the MSCI ACWI Index, which returned 14.93%, and the MSCI World Index, which returned 13.76%. Please refer to the table below for detailed performance.
Performance (%)
2Q26
YTD
1 Year
3 Years
5 Years
10 Years
Since Inception*
Global Equity WM Composite (pure gross)
6.92
3.99
13.22
12.14
6.96
11.31
10.38
Global Equity WM Composite (net)
6.40
2.97
11.01
9.95
4.84
9.10
8.19
MSCI ACWI Index (net)
14.93
11.25
23.67
19.70
10.98
12.78
10.68
MSCI World Index (net)
13.76
9.69
21.34
19.24
11.47
13.14
11.37
*The inception date for the Global Equity WM Composite is December 1, 2010. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Aristotle Global Equity WM Composite returns are presented pure gross and net of maximum wrap fee and include the reinvestment of all income. Pure gross returns do not reflect the deduction of any trading costs or other fees and are supplemental to the net returns. Net returns are calculated by subtracting the highest applicable wrap/SMA fee, which includes trading costs and custodial fees, from the pure gross composite return. The highest applicable wrap/SMA fee is 2.00% on an annual basis, or 0.50% quarterly from inception to 12/31/2023 and 0.17% monthly from 1/1/2024 to present. Please see important disclosures at the end of this document.
Source: FactSet Past performance is not indicative of future results. Sector attribution shows how much of a portfolio’s overall return is directly attributable to stock selection and asset allocation decisions within the portfolio, highlighting which sectors contributed or detracted to the total return. Attribution includes the reinvestment of income. Attribution is presented pure gross of fees and does not include the deduction of all fees and expenses that a client or investor has paid or would have paid. Please refer to the gross and net composite returns included within to understand the overall impact of fees.
From a sector perspective, the portfolio’s underperformance relative to the MSCI ACWI Index can be attributed to both security selection and allocation effects. Security selection and an underweight in Information Technology, as well as security selection in Industrials, detracted the most from the portfolio’s relative performance. Conversely, security selection in Communication Services and Materials and a lack of exposure to Utilities contributed most to relative return.
Regionally, both security selection and allocation effects were responsible for the portfolio’s underperformance relative to the MSCI ACWI Index. Security selection in North America detracted the most from relative performance, while security selection in Asia/Pacific ex-Japan contributed the most.
Contributors and Detractors for 2Q 2026
Relative Contributors
Relative Detractors
Microchip Technology
TotalEnergies
Qualcomm
Munich Reinsurance
Jazz Pharmaceuticals
Martin Marietta Materials
FANUC
Otsuka Holdings
Daikin Industries
Chevron
Relative contributors and detractors are based on attribution total effect and exclude benchmark securities not held in the portfolio.
Munich Re, the world’s largest reinsurance company, was a detractor during the quarter. Although the company reported strong operating results, supported by lower-than-expected catastrophe losses and disciplined underwriting, shares declined as investors focused on continued pricing pressure in portions of the global reinsurance market and weaker investment results driven by capital market volatility. We view these pressures as part of the normal insurance cycle rather than a change in the quality of the franchise. Munich Re provides balance sheet capacity and risk expertise to insurers around the world across property and casualty, life and health, cyber, and other complex risks—areas where scale, data, underwriting judgment, and long-standing client relationships are critical. The company’s diversified business mix, including its growing primary insurance operations through ERGO, can help reduce reliance on any single product line or geography, while its strong capital position provides flexibility to absorb catastrophe losses, support clients when capacity is most valuable, and return capital to shareholders. In addition, management continues to differentiate Munich Re through investments in technology, data, and R&D, which should improve underwriting, claims handling, and efficiency over time. We believe these advantages, together with opportunities for share gains in specialty lines such as cyber and in underpenetrated markets such as Asia, position the company to generate attractive returns across insurance cycles.
Martin Marietta, a leading supplier of construction aggregates and building materials, was a detractor during the quarter.Shares modestly declined as investors remained focused on the pace of recovery in residential and private nonresidential construction activity, despite continued strength in infrastructure, energy, and data center-related demand. While the stock underperformed during the period, it remains a strong performer over the past 12 months. We continue to believe Martin Marietta’s irreplaceable aggregates reserves, disciplined pricing strategy, and strategically located asset base position the company to benefit from long-term infrastructure investment and population growth while generating attractive FREE cash flow over time. In addition, the announced acquisition of Lhoist North America further broadens the company’s portfolio into attractive industrial markets and, if executed successfully, should enhance its long-term earnings power and cash flow generation.
Qualcomm, a leading semiconductor and communications technology company, was among the largest contributors for the quarter. Shares recovered as management indicated that the inventory adjustments and production constraints resulting from higher memory costs were progressing largely as expected and that handset revenues from Chinese customers were expected to reach a bottom. As we noted last quarter, we believed these headwinds to be cyclical rather than structural and did not alter our long-term investment thesis. The company also continued to make progress on its long-term strategy of evolving from a handset-centric company into a broader provider of connected computing technologies. Automotive revenue reached another record high, while Internet of Things (IoT) and newer businesses such as AI-enabled PCs, industrial applications, and data center computing continue to represent a growing portion of the company and remain central to its long-term diversification strategy. We believe Qualcomm’s technologies will continue to benefit as connectivity expands across devices and AI workloads increasingly extend from the cloud to the edge, supporting Qualcomm’s ability to generate strong levels of FREE cash flow in the long run.
Jazz Pharmaceuticals, a biopharmaceutical company focused on neuroscience and oncology, was among the largest contributors during the quarter. Shares appreciated as the company delivered strong commercial execution across its portfolio, reinforcing the durability of its neuroscience franchise and the growing contribution from oncology. First-quarter revenue increased by 19% year over year, led by Xywav, Epidiolex, Zepzelca, and Modeyso, while reaffirming its full-year financial guidance. Results also highlighted several catalysts we have previously identified, including the expansion of Zepzelca into front-line maintenance treatment for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer, ongoing growth of Epidiolex in rare epilepsies, and continued uptake of Xywav for narcolepsy and idiopathic hypersomnia (IH), where it remains the only FDA-approved therapy. Management also continued preparations for the launch of Ziihera in a significantly larger cancer indication, which has the potential to meaningfully expand the company’s oncology business. We continue to believe Jazz’s portfolio of differentiated therapies, expanding oncology franchise, and disciplined approach to business development position the company to create long-term value. The company has successfully evolved from a business primarily focused on sleep disorders into a more diversified rare disease and oncology company, supported by strong cash flow generation and continued investment in both its pipeline and strategic acquisitions.
Recent Portfolio Activity
Buys
Sells
Techtronic Industries
Danaher
Wal-Mart de Mexico
Dolby Laboratories
Tokyo Century
During the quarter, we sold our positions in Danaher, Dolby Laboratories, and Tokyo Century and purchased Techtronic Industries and Wal-Mart de Mexico.
We first invested in Danaher, a company focused on biotechnology, life sciences and diagnostics, in the first quarter of 2016, attracted by its disciplined capital allocation, differentiated operating culture, and consistent FREE cash flow generation. The business is distinguished by a portfolio of market-leading franchises and a high mix of recurring consumables revenue tied to a large installed base. Its differentiated operating culture, anchored by the Danaher Business System (DBS), has historically enabled the company to be a highly effective acquirer, consistently integrating new businesses, expanding margins, and driving strong FREE cash flow generation. Over our decade-long holding period, Danaher successfully transformed itself from a diversified industrial company into a more focused healthcare business. This evolution included the spinoffs of Fortive, Envista, and Veralto, as well as the acquisition and integration of key assets such as Pall, Cepheid, and Cytiva. The company also increased the contribution from recurring revenue and workflow-based solutions embedded in customer operations, which contributed to the durability and predictability of the business.
More recently, as Danaher has shifted further into more complex, innovation-driven end markets, the application of DBS appears to be less differentiated than it was in Danaher’s traditional manufacturing-oriented businesses. Success in these new end markets is increasingly driven by scientific innovation, faster product cycles, and more specialized customer requirements. At the same time, increased scale and a more centralized organizational structure appear to be limiting flexibility at the business unit level, reducing the speed and effectiveness with which opportunities can be pursued. While we continue to view Danaher as a high-quality business, we believe much of our original investment thesis has now been realized, with fewer company-specific catalysts ahead. Accordingly, we elected to exit the position and redeploy the proceeds into what we view as more attractive opportunities.
We first invested in Dolby Laboratories, the creator and licensor of audio and imaging technologies, in the first quarter of 2022. We were attracted to Dolby’s asset-light licensing model, trusted brand, strong intellectual property portfolio, and deep relationships with both content creators and device makers. We believed Dolby would benefit from the growing demand for more immersive entertainment experiences, allowing the company to extend its technology into new use cases. During our ownership, Dolby executed well in several respects: increasing adoption across content and devices, expanding into newer end markets such as autos and gaming, adding to its patent portfolio, and maintaining the high-margin, cash-generative financial profile that first attracted us. However, adoption has not translated into the level of earnings growth we initially expected. As a result, while we continue to view Dolby as a high-quality franchise and will monitor its monetization efforts, we believe the remaining catalysts lack the visibility and timing we require, and exited the position.
We first invested in Tokyo Century, the Japan-based provider of leasing and specialty finance solutions, in the third quarter of 2024. The company benefits from a diversified platform across equipment leasing, specialty finance, automobility, and global financing, as well as its strategic relationships with partners such as NTT, Itochu, and CSI Leasing. We also saw attractive catalysts in aviation leasing through Aviation Capital Group, IT leasing through CSI Leasing, and data center-related investments. During our ownership, Tokyo Century continued to benefit from favorable aircraft leasing conditions, including tight aircraft supply, rising lease rates, and improved aircraft values, while its broader leasing franchise remained supported by scale, a strong balance sheet, and diversified revenue streams. However, as we reassessed the Global Equity portfolio, we concluded that a more direct investment in Itochu, which owns roughly 30% of Tokyo Century, together with a new investment in Techtronic, offered a more attractive use of capital. Given this overlap and the clearer catalysts we see in these opportunities, we elected to exit Tokyo Century and redeploy the proceeds.
Techtronic Industries Co. Ltd.
Headquartered in Hong Kong, Techtronic Industries (“TTI”) is a global manufacturer of power tools, outdoor power equipment and related accessories. The company operates primarily through two flagship brands: Milwaukee, which serves professional tradespeople, and Ryobi, which targets the DIY and light professional market (including handymen and maintenance professionals whose needs fall between homeowners and full-time trades). Over the past decade, TTI has transformed itself into one of the leading players in the global power tool industry, driven by sustained innovation and disciplined brand investment.
Milwaukee has been the primary growth engine, expanding from approximately $450 million in sales in the early 2000s to roughly $10 billion today. The brand has gained meaningful share in professional trades through a focus on productivity, safety, and battery-powered innovation. Ryobi remains a leading DIY platform, supported by a long-standing distribution relationship with Home Depot, TTI’s largest retail partner.
TTI continues to benefit from the long-term industry transition from corded, gas-powered, and pneumatic tools toward battery-powered platforms. The company’s strategy of maintaining backward compatibility across battery generations has reinforced customer loyalty and created a durable installed base across both Milwaukee and Ryobi ecosystems.
High-Quality Business
Some of the quality characteristics we have identified for TTI include:
Leading positions in professional and DIY power tools through the Milwaukee and Ryobi brands, supported by strong brand equity, deep engagement with professional tradespeople, and a track record of consistent product innovation;
A powerful battery ecosystem strategy, with over 110 million M18 and 65 million M12 batteries in circulation and backward and forward compatibility across generations, creating switching costs and repeat purchases across hundreds of compatible tools;
Ongoing investment in research and development, enabling consistent product innovation, market share gains, and expansion into adjacent product categories; and
Deep retail partnerships, particularly with Home Depot, reinforced by dedicated in-store sales representation and merchandising support.
Attractive Valuation
We believe shares are attractively valued relative to our estimate of intrinsic value. Our analysis reflects the growing contribution of the Milwaukee franchise, which now represents the majority of operating profit, and the benefits of continued mix shift toward professional products, as well as stabilization of underperforming segments. In addition, as recent investment spending normalizes, we expect FREE cash flow to increase to levels that we believe are not fully reflected in the current share price.
Compelling Catalysts
Catalysts we have identified for TTI, which we believe will cause its stock price to appreciate over our three- to five-year investment horizon, include:
Continued mix shift toward the higher-margin Milwaukee brand, which has grown from 18% of total sales in 2010 to approximately two-thirds today;
Geographic expansion of the Milwaukee brand outside the United States, where market share remains below North American levels, and introduction of the Ryobi platform into additional markets such as Latin America and Australia;
Expansion into adjacent professional categories, including personal protective equipment and modular tool storage systems, thereby increasing wallet share within the professional customer base; and
Improvement in operating profitability through turnaround of underperforming segments and greater cost discipline.
Wal-Mart de Mexico SAB de CV
Founded in 1952 and headquartered in Mexico City, Wal-Mart de Mexico (“Walmex”) is the largest retailer in Mexico and Central America and a key subsidiary of Walmart Inc., which retains a majority ownership stake. Walmex operates more than 3,800 stores across multiple formats—Bodega Aurrerá (discount stores and the company’s fastest-growing format), Walmart Supercenter (big-box retail), Sam’s Club (membership warehouse), Walmart Express (small supermarkets), and other discount outlets—giving it a uniquely diversified presence across the consumer landscape.
This multi-format approach serves a wide spectrum of customers and shopping occasions—from everyday essentials and large family baskets to convenience and premium purchases. Bodega Aurrerá, for example, has become a household name across Mexico and now represents roughly half of the company’s stores, while Sam’s Club caters to membership customers seeking bulk purchases and higher-ticket items. Together, these formats provide Walmex broad market coverage, geographic reach, and strong brand loyalty across urban centers, suburban communities, and regional towns.
In recent years, the company has significantly expanded its omnichannel ecosystem, investing in e-commerce, logistics, and digital services to enhance convenience and deepen customer engagement. E-commerce is ~8% of total sales, supported by strong growth in online grocery and third-party marketplace offerings. Complementary platforms, such as Cashi (digital payments), BAIT (mobile telecom), and Walmart Connect (digital advertising), extend Walmex’s reach into financial and digital services, strengthening customer ties and building new revenue streams.
High-Quality Business
Some of the quality characteristics we have identified for Walmex include:
Dominant scale advantages with over 3,000 stores in Mexico, making it the clear market leader in food and general merchandise retail;
Diversified and resilient revenue base, with a meaningful percentage of sales from grocery—providing recurring traffic and stable cash flow—complemented by general merchandise, fuel, pharmacy, and membership-based services;
Strong returns on invested capital (~18%), supported by consistent execution and capital discipline; and
Support from Walmart Inc., which provides access to global best practices, digital tools, and procurement efficiencies.
Attractive Valuation
We believe Walmex is attractively valued relative to its long-term normalized earnings power. In our view, the market underappreciates the company’s ability to grow revenue through ongoing store expansion and strengthen margins and FREE cash flow generation through efficiency gains, scale benefits and continued growth in higher-margin channels, such as private label and e-commerce.
Compelling Catalysts
Catalysts we have identified for Walmex, which we believe will cause its stock price to appreciate over our three- to five-year investment horizon, include:
Expansion of private label penetration (from mid-teens to mid-20s), which should improve profitability and customer loyalty;
Further development of the e-commerce platform, with Walmex aiming to become a one-stop shop by combining online grocery and a third-party marketplace, supported by digital tools adapted from Walmart U.S.;
Disciplined store expansion, with current plans to add approximately 1,500 new stores across Mexico and Central America over the next five years, extending reach and scale advantages; and
Leadership continuity, as newly appointed interim CEO Cristian Barrientos, a veteran Walmart executive with more than 25 years of experience, provides operational stability and maintains focus on profitable growth during the leadership transition.
Conclusion
As we look ahead, the global backdrop remains complex. Geopolitical developments, central bank decisions, and changes in investor risk appetite can all influence returns over shorter periods, but these factors are difficult to forecast with consistency. Rather than position the portfolio around macro outcomes, we continue to focus on the businesses we own and the actions management teams are taking to increase value over time.
Our investment process centers on the three pillars of Quality, Valuation, and Catalysts. We seek companies with strong competitive positions, capable management teams, financial resilience, and identifiable opportunities to improve profitability and FREE cash flow. While markets can move quickly from one theme to the next, we believe owning high-quality businesses at attractive valuations remains the best way to create value for clients over the long term.
Disclosures
The opinions expressed herein are those of Aristotle Capital Management, LLC (Aristotle Capital) and are subject to change without notice. Past performance is not a guarantee or indicator of future results. This material is not financial advice or an offer to buy or sell any product. You should not assume that any of the securities transactions, sectors or holdings discussed in this report were or will be profitable, or that recommendations Aristotle Capital makes in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of the securities listed in this report. The portfolio characteristics shown relate to the Aristotle Global Equity Advisory strategy. Not every client’s account will have these characteristics. Aristotle Capital reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs. There is no assurance that any securities discussed herein will remain in an account’s portfolio at the time you receive this report or that securities sold have not been repurchased. The securities discussed may not represent an account’s entire portfolio and, in the aggregate, may represent only a small percentage of an account’s portfolio holdings. The performance attribution presented is of a representative account from Aristotle Capital’s Global Equity WM Composite. The representative account is a discretionary client account which was chosen to most closely reflect the investment style of the strategy. The criteria used for representative account selection is based on the account’s period of time under management and its similarity of holdings in relation to the strategy. Recommendations made in the last 12 months are available upon request.
Composite returns are presented pure gross and net of the maximum wrap fee and include the reinvestment of all income. Pure gross returns do not reflect the deduction of any trading costs or other fees and are supplemental to the net returns. Net returns are calculated by subtracting the highest applicable wrap/SMA fee, which includes trading costs and custodial fees, from the pure gross composite return. The highest applicable wrap/SMA fee is 2.00% on an annual basis, or 0.50% quarterly from inception to 12/31/2023 and 0.17% monthly from 1/1/2024 to present.
All investments carry a certain degree of risk, including the possible loss of principal. Investments are also subject to political, market, currency and regulatory risks or economic developments. International investments involve special risks that may in particular cause a loss in principal, including currency fluctuation, lower liquidity, different accounting methods and economic and political systems, and higher transaction costs. These risks typically are greater in emerging markets. While Large-capitalization companies may have more stable prices than smaller, less established companies, they are still subject to equity securities risk. In addition, large-capitalization equity security prices may not rise as much as prices of equity securities of small-capitalization companies. Securities of small- and medium-sized companies tend to have a shorter history of operations and be more volatile and less liquid. Value stocks can perform differently from the market as a whole and other types of stocks. The material is provided for informational and/or educational purposes only and is not intended to be and should not be construed as investment, legal or tax advice and/or a legal opinion. Investors should consult their financial and tax adviser before making investments. The opinions referenced are as of the date of publication, may be modified due to changes in the market or economic conditions, and may not necessarily come to pass. Information and data presented has been developed internally and/or obtained from sources believed to be reliable. Aristotle Capital does not guarantee the accuracy, adequacy or completeness of such information.
Aristotle Capital Management, LLC is an independent investment adviser registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended. Registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training. More information about Aristotle Capital, including our investment strategies, fees and objectives, can be found in our Form ADV Part 2, which is available upon request. ACM-2607-69
Performance Disclosures
Sources: CAPS CompositeHubTM, MSCI
The Aristotle Global Equity WM Composite has an inception date of December 1, 2010. As of 1/1/2024, the composite was renamed from the Global Equity Advisory Composite.
Past performance is not indicative of future results. The information provided should not be considered financial advice or a recommendation to purchase or sell any particular security or product. Performance results for periods greater than one year have been annualized.
Composite returns are presented pure gross and net of the maximum wrap fee and include the reinvestment of all income. Pure gross returns do not reflect the deduction of any trading costs or other fees and are supplemental to the net returns. Net returns are calculated by subtracting the highest applicable wrap/SMA fee, which includes trading costs and custodial fees, from the pure gross composite return. The highest applicable wrap/SMA fee is 2.00% on an annual basis, or 0.50% quarterly from inception to 12/31/2023 and 0.17% monthly from 1/1/2024 to present.
Index Disclosures
The MSCI ACWI Index captures large and mid cap representation across Developed Markets (DM) and Emerging Markets (EM) countries. The index covers approximately 85% of the global investable equity opportunity set. The MSCI ACWI Equal Weighted Index represents an alternative weighting scheme to its market capitalization-weighted parent index, the MSCI ACWI. The Index includes the same constituents as its parent (large and mid-cap securities from 23 developed markets and 24 emerging markets countries). However, at each quarterly rebalance date, all index constituents are weighted equally, effectively removing the influence of each constituent’s current price (high or low). The MSCI World Index (Net) is a free float-adjusted market capitalization-weighted index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets. The MSCI World Index includes the following 23 developed market countries: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, Singapore, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the United States. The index returns are net of withholding taxes. The MSCI ACWI Index (Net) was stated as the primary benchmark on June 1, 2024 and the MSCI World Index (Net) became the secondary benchmark. The MSCI Emerging Markets Index is a free float-adjusted market capitalization-weighted index that is designed to measure equity market performance of emerging markets. The MSCI Emerging Markets Index consists of the following 24 emerging market country indexes: Brazil, Chile, China, Colombia, Czech Republic, Egypt, Greece, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Korea, Kuwait, Malaysia, Mexico, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey and United Arab Emirates. The MSCI ACWI Growth Index captures large and mid-cap securities exhibiting overall growth style characteristics across 23 developed markets countries and 24 emerging markets countries. The MSCI ACWI Value Index captures large and mid-cap securities exhibiting overall value style characteristics across 23 developed markets countries and 24 emerging markets countries. The MSCI Europe Index captures large and mid-cap representation across 15 developed markets countries in Europe. With approximately 400 constituents, the Index covers approximately 85% of the free float-adjusted market capitalization across the European developed markets equity universe. The MSCI Japan Index is designed to measure the performance of the large and mid-cap segments of the Japanese market. With approximately 200 constituents, the Index covers approximately 85% of the free float-adjusted market capitalization in Japan. The S&P 500® Index is the Standard & Poor’s Composite Index of 500 stocks and is a widely recognized, unmanaged index of common stock prices. The S&P 500® Equal Weight Index is designed to be the size-neutral version of the S&P 500. It includes the same constituents as the market capitalization-weighted S&P 500, but each company in the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index is allocated the same weight at each quarterly rebalance. The Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond Index is a flagship measure of global investment grade debt from 27 local currency markets. This multi-currency benchmark includes Treasury, government-related, corporate and securitized fixed rate bonds from both developed and emerging markets issuers. The Brent Crude Oil Index is a major trading classification of sweet light crude oil that serves as a major benchmark price for purchases of oil worldwide. The volatility (beta) of the Composite may be greater or less than the benchmarks. It is not possible to invest directly in these indexes.