(All MSCI index returns are shown net and in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.)

Markets Review

Sources: CAPS CompositeHubTM, Bloomberg
Past performance is not indicative of future results. Aristotle Global Equity WM Composite returns are presented pure gross and net of maximum wrap fee and include the reinvestment of income. Pure gross returns do not reflect the deduction of any trading costs or other fees and are supplemental to the net returns. Net returns are calculated by subtracting the highest applicable wrap/SMA fee, which includes trading costs and custodial fees, from the pure gross composite return. The highest applicable wrap/SMA fee is 2.00% on an annual basis, or 0.50% quarterly from inception to 12/31/2023 and 0.17% monthly from 1/1/2024 to present. Please see important disclosures at the end of this document.

Shocks to energy prices stemming from renewed conflict in the Middle East, changing interest rate expectations, trade tensions, and enthusiasm (and fear) surrounding artificial intelligence (even among companies outside the United States) have become recurring themes of the market environment. Though global equity markets continue to climb, macroeconomic headlines seem to draw investors toward certain industries and away from others regardless of business fundamentals.

Brent crude, for example, started the year at roughly $60 per barrel and nearly doubled by May, then dropped back to ~$70 in July, only to spike back up above $100 later in the third quarter. Turning to central bank policy, following an unprecedented tightening cycle that concluded in 2023, the U.S. Federal Reserve cut interest rates six times in 2024 and 2025 before reversing course in the most recent quarter, joining several European central banks in raising rates. As governments in the developed world face a mix of fiscal deficits and stubborn inflation, longer-dated sovereign bond yields are climbing as well.

Against this backdrop, we believe it is particularly important to distinguish between businesses whose financial outcomes are dependent on prevailing macro conditions and those capable of succeeding across a range of environments. We recognize that “quality” is an over-used term—and often used too broadly—across the investment industry. For us, it is important to distinguish among three distinct forms of quality:

  • Transient Quality can look exceptional at the peak of a cycle, with scarcity-driven pricing power, expanding margins and high returns on capital. On the surface the economics can appear highly attractive, but when supply eventually catches up, prices normalize and investors realize what has happened, significant valuation resets can occur.
  • Conventional Quality possesses many of the characteristics traditionally associated with great businesses—powerful brands, customer loyalty, incumbency advantages and ecosystem lock-in—but the old moats are eroding. Digital advertising, ecommerce, private label, low barriers to entry and technological disruption have made certain franchises less structurally resilient than they once were.
  • Durable Quality is where we are most energized because scarcity is permanent rather than cyclical (or at least less so). These businesses can raise prices ahead of inflation for years without impairing volume, protected by natural monopolies, geology, irreplaceable infrastructure, essentiality, regulation or deliberate scarcity. Consider businesses like luxury goods manufacturers, regulated utilities and mission-critical technology solutions, or specialty data providers, unique ingredient producers and transportation platforms.

By focusing on durable, high-quality businesses, we seek to look past short-term macroeconomic volatility and capitalize on the disconnects it can create between share prices and long-term earnings power. Importantly, we believe today’s environment continues to provide such opportunities, enabling us to selectively enhance the portfolio when we identify businesses offering a particularly compelling combination of quality, valuation and catalysts.

Performance and Attribution Summary

For the third quarter of 2026, Aristotle Capital’s Global Equity WM Composite posted a total return of 0.29% pure gross of fees (-0.20% net of fees), underperforming the MSCI ACWI Index, which returned 1.60%, and the MSCI World Index, which returned 1.88%. Please refer to the table below for detailed performance.

Performance (%) 3Q26YTD1 Year3 Years5 Years10 Years Since Inception*
Global Equity WM Composite (pure gross)0.294.308.3413.677.0310.7610.22
Global Equity WM Composite (net)-0.202.766.2211.464.928.568.04
MSCI ACWI Index (net)1.6013.0316.7521.7311.5712.3810.61
MSCI World Index (net)1.8811.7515.2421.4011.8912.8111.31
*The inception date for the Global Equity WM Composite is December 1, 2010. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Aristotle Global Equity WM Composite returns are presented pure gross and net of maximum wrap fee and include the reinvestment of all income. Pure gross returns do not reflect the deduction of any trading costs or other fees and are supplemental to the net returns. Net returns are calculated by subtracting the highest applicable wrap/SMA fee, which includes trading costs and custodial fees, from the pure gross composite return. The highest applicable wrap/SMA fee is 2.00% on an annual basis, or 0.50% quarterly from inception to 12/31/2023 and 0.17% monthly from 1/1/2024 to present. Please see important disclosures at the end of this document.

Source: FactSet
Past performance is not indicative of future results. Sector attribution shows how much of a portfolio’s overall return is directly attributable to stock selection and asset allocation decisions within the portfolio, highlighting which sectors contributed or detracted to the total return. Attribution includes the reinvestment of income. Attribution is presented pure gross of fees and does not include the deduction of all fees and expenses that a client or investor has paid or would have paid. Please refer to the gross and net composite returns included within to understand the overall impact of fees.

From a sector perspective, the portfolio’s underperformance relative to the MSCI ACWI Index can be attributed to both security selection and allocation effects. Security selection in Materials, Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary detracted the most from the portfolio’s relative performance. Conversely, security selection in Industrials and Financials, as well as a lack of exposure to Utilities, contributed most to relative return.

Regionally, security selection was responsible for the portfolio’s underperformance relative to the MSCI ACWI Index while allocation effects contributed. Security selection in North America detracted the most from relative performance, while an overweight in Japan contributed the most.

Contributors and Detractors for 3Q 2026

Relative ContributorsRelative Detractors
DBS GroupMartin Marietta Materials
ITOCHUMicrochip Technology
AmgenBrookfield
SonyRentokil Initial
Mitsubishi UFJ FinancialNorwegian Cruise Line Holdings

Relative contributors and detractors are based on attribution total effect and exclude benchmark securities not held in the portfolio.

Microchip Technology, the microcontroller (MCU) and analog semiconductor producer, was a detractor during the period. The company’s stock sold off despite continued evidence of improvement in its underlying business. Customer inventories continued to normalize and bookings remained strong, supporting a recovery in demand following the prolonged industry downturn. Higher factory utilization and disciplined expense management also contributed to improved profitability and cash flow generation. While management noted potential capacity constraints at certain external manufacturing partners, Microchip’s internal capacity remains sufficient to support its growth expectations. We believe the company’s broad product portfolio, long-standing customer relationships and commitment to extended product lifecycles position it well to benefit from a continued recovery in its core end markets, while growing opportunities in data centers and aerospace & defense provide additional avenues for long-term growth.

Rentokil Initial, the U.K.-based pest control and hygiene services company, was a significant detractor during the quarter. Shares declined following the company’s interim results as investors focused on weaker growth in portions of its North American pest control business and management’s decision to retire its previous 2027 North American margin target. Importantly, North American organic growth improved from the prior year, while customer retention and profitability also increased. Under newly appointed CEO Mike Duffy, the company has strengthened its North American leadership team and is undertaking a broader operational restructuring, with plans to reinvest cost savings into initiatives intended to accelerate organic growth rather than maximize near-term margins. While we continue to assess the new management team’s strategy and execution, we believe Rentokil’s scale, route density and recurring service model provide the company with meaningful competitive advantages.

DBS Group, a leading Asian financial services company headquartered in Singapore, was the top contributor during the quarter. Shares rose following another strong earnings report, with record earnings supported by continued growth in wealth management and other fee-based businesses, as well as resilient net interest income despite lower local interest rates. The company continues to benefit from growing wealth creation across Asia, while its strong capital position has supported increased shareholder distributions and disciplined capital allocation. We believe DBS’s strong market position, diversified sources of earnings and disciplined capital allocation support attractive long-term returns.

Amgen, the biopharmaceutical company, was one of the largest contributors during the quarter. The company has continued to benefit from growth across several newer and expanding medicines, including Repatha (cholesterol), Evenity (osteoporosis), Tezspire (asthma) and Uplizna (rare autoimmune diseases), while also emphasizing clinical developments across its pipeline. While Amgen faces increasing biosimilar competition for several of its mature biologic therapies, the company is also benefiting from opportunities in the growing biosimilars market. Leveraging its biologics expertise and global manufacturing scale, the company has generated more than $15 billion in biosimilar sales since 2018, with additional candidates in development. We believe the breadth of Amgen’s portfolio and improving research productivity, combined with its ability to capitalize on its global commercial and manufacturing infrastructure, position the company to benefit as its pipeline develops.

Recent Portfolio Activity

BuysSells
E Ink Holdings*Assa Abloy*
McKessonOshkosh

During the quarter, we sold our positions in Assa Abloy and Oshkosh and purchased E Ink Holdings and McKesson.

We first purchased Assa Abloy, the world’s largest provider of door opening and entrance solutions, in 2016. Over our investment period, the company strengthened its leading position in a fragmented industry, benefiting from significant replacement and upgrade demand, as well as the growing adoption of higher-value electromechanical and digital access solutions. The company also continued to build on its long track record of acquiring businesses and creating additional value through integration, operational improvement and access to its global platform. More recently, however, we believe the opportunity for incremental value creation through M&A has become less compelling, while opportunities to further optimize the company’s existing portfolio appear unlikely. As such, we chose to exit our position and redeploy capital into opportunities we believe offer a more attractive combination of valuation and catalysts. (*E Ink does not offer an ADR or GDR and was purchased only in accounts registered to trade on the Taiwan Stock Exchange. For those accounts unable to purchase E Ink, Assa Abloy continues to be held as a replacement.)

We first invested in Oshkosh, a manufacturer of specialty vehicles and access equipment, in the third quarter of 2013. During our holding period, we believe the company executed well on many of the catalysts we had identified, including improved profitability through pricing discipline, manufacturing efficiencies, a more favorable business mix, continued product innovation and the ramp-up of production of the U.S. Postal Service’s Next Generation Delivery Vehicle program. Given the progress, we chose to sell our position and redeploy the proceeds into what we believe is a more attractive opportunity in McKesson.

Headquartered in Hsinchu, Taiwan, E Ink is the global leader in electronic paper (“ePaper”) display technology. Unlike traditional LCD or OLED screens, ePaper uses electrically charged color pigments to create a paper-like display that reflects ambient light and only requires power when an image changes. These characteristics allow ePaper displays to remain visible for extended periods while consuming very little energy, making the technology particularly well-suited for applications such as eReaders, electronic shelf labels (“ESLs”), eNotes and digital signage. E Ink holds an estimated 80%-90% share of the global ePaper display market and is currently the only manufacturer capable of mass-producing high-quality ePaper technology at scale.

Historically, E Ink was best known for supplying the displays used in eReaders such as Amazon’s Kindle and Rakuten’s Kobo. However, the business is increasingly being driven by ESLs—digital price tags that allow retailers to remotely update prices, promotions and product information across stores in real time. ESLs can reduce the labor associated with manually replacing paper labels, improve pricing accuracy and increasingly support inventory management and order fulfillment. E Ink does not manufacture the finished labels; rather, it supplies its proprietary ePaper material to leading ESL manufacturers, allowing the company to participate broadly in the growth of the market without competing in the more commoditized assembly business.

Some of the quality characteristics we have identified for E Ink include:

  • A dominant position in ePaper displays, supported by proprietary technology, extensive intellectual property and decades of research and development;
  • Significant barriers to entry arising from the technical complexity of ePaper manufacturing and the need for consistent product quality, scale and established relationships with leading device manufacturers and ESL solution providers; and
  • A strong financial profile, including a net cash balance sheet and attractive returns on capital.

We believe shares trade at a meaningful discount to our estimate of intrinsic value based on E Ink’s normalized earnings potential. Our analysis reflects the company’s long runway for growth across ePaper applications while recognizing the established earnings contribution from eReaders and eNotes.

Catalysts we have identified for E Ink, which we believe will cause its stock price to appreciate over our three- to five-year investment horizon, include:

  • Continued adoption of ESL, particularly in the underpenetrated U.S. market, as retailers automate price changes, to reduce manual labor requirements and better integrate physical stores with inventory and order-management systems;
  • Improving business mix as higher-margin ESL and other IoT applications become a larger portion of revenue, supporting higher normalized margins and returns over time;
  • Growing replacement and upgrade demand as earlier ESL installations are refreshed with newer generations of the technology; and
  • Expansion of ePaper into digital signage, supported by growing adoption of E Ink’s color technologies across retail, advertising and other commercial applications.

Headquartered in Irving, Texas, and founded in 1833, McKesson is the market leader in U.S. pharmaceutical distribution. The company serves as a critical intermediary within the healthcare system, sourcing branded, generic, specialty, biosimilar and over-the-counter pharmaceuticals from manufacturers and delivering them to retail pharmacies, hospitals, health systems, physician practices, long-term care providers and other healthcare customers. Together with Cardinal Health and Cencora, McKesson is one of three dominant national pharmaceutical distributors that collectively account for more than 90% of the U.S. market.

McKesson’s role extends well beyond the physical distribution of pharmaceuticals. The company manages sourcing and inventory to help ensure reliable product availability, provides technology solutions, and helps manufacturers efficiently reach thousands of healthcare providers through a scaled distribution network. Over time, the company has expanded further into higher-value healthcare services, including oncology and multispecialty practice solutions, biopharma services, and prescription technology solutions that help improve medication access, affordability and adherence.

Some of the quality characteristics we have identified for McKesson include:

  • Mission-critical distribution capabilities that are difficult to replicate, supported by national scale, extensive infrastructure and regulatory expertise;
  • Long-standing customer relationships and multi-year distribution agreements that create meaningful switching costs and deepen McKesson’s role within the U.S. healthcare system;
  • Attractive underlying economics, including what we consider to be strong returns on invested capital and FREE cash flow generation, supported by limited capital requirements and favorable working-capital dynamics; and
  • Resilient demand characteristics, as prescription drug utilization is largely non-discretionary and less sensitive to broader macroeconomic cycles.

We believe shares of McKesson are attractively valued given our estimates of normalized earnings. In our view, the company’s low reported distribution margins understate the attractive economics of its core pharmaceutical distribution business, while its growing higher-margin businesses in Oncology & Multispecialty, biopharma services and Prescription Technology Solutions should support higher normalized earnings and FREE cash flow over time.

Catalysts we have identified for McKesson, which we believe will cause its stock price to appreciate over our three- to five-year investment horizon, include:

  • Continued expansion of the Oncology & Multispecialty segment through additional physician practices and a growing suite of services spanning drug distribution, technology, clinical research and practice management;
  • Continued growth in biopharma services and Prescription Technology Solutions, as McKesson helps manufacturers, providers, pharmacies and patients improve medication access, affordability and adherence;
  • Expansion of McKesson’s oncology practice-management capabilities into adjacent specialties, such as ophthalmology, through targeted acquisitions and internal investment;
  • Ongoing expansion of NorthStar Rx (McKesson’s own private-label generic pharmaceutical business) into biosimilars, leveraging its established oncology relationships as biosimilar adoption grows; and
  • Ongoing progress toward the separation of Medical-Surgical Solutions, allowing management to focus capital and resources on McKesson’s higher-return businesses.

Conclusion

Periods of relative underperformance can test conviction, particularly when market leadership is narrow and rapidly changing. However, we believe the appropriate response is not to chase what has recently worked but to remain focused on the long-term drivers of value creation. This discipline has guided our investment process across multiple market cycles and continues to shape how we position the portfolio today.

Importantly, recent performance has not been accompanied by a deterioration in the businesses we own. In many cases, earnings have continued to grow even as valuation multiples have compressed, creating what we believe is an increasingly attractive disconnect between share prices and normalized earnings power. While periods like this are challenging, they can also create opportunity for long-term investors. We believe the very conditions that have challenged recent relative performance have strengthened the portfolio’s prospective return potential.

Disclosures

The opinions expressed herein are those of Aristotle Capital Management, LLC (Aristotle Capital) and are subject to change without notice. Past performance is not a guarantee or indicator of future results. This material is not financial advice or an offer to buy or sell any product. You should not assume that any of the securities transactions, sectors or holdings discussed in this report were or will be profitable, or that recommendations Aristotle Capital makes in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of the securities listed in this report. The portfolio characteristics shown relate to the Aristotle Global Equity Advisory strategy. Not every client’s account will have these characteristics. Aristotle Capital reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs. There is no assurance that any securities discussed herein will remain in an account’s portfolio at the time you receive this report or that securities sold have not been repurchased. The securities discussed may not represent an account’s entire portfolio and, in the aggregate, may represent only a small percentage of an account’s portfolio holdings. The performance attribution presented is of a representative account from Aristotle Capital’s Global Equity WM Composite. The representative account is a discretionary client account which was chosen to most closely reflect the investment style of the strategy. The criteria used for representative account selection is based on the account’s period of time under management and its similarity of holdings in relation to the strategy. Recommendations made in the last 12 months are available upon request.

Composite returns are presented pure gross and net of the maximum wrap fee and include the reinvestment of all income. Pure gross returns do not reflect the deduction of any trading costs or other fees and are supplemental to the net returns. Net returns are calculated by subtracting the highest applicable wrap/SMA fee, which includes trading costs and custodial fees, from the pure gross composite return. The highest applicable wrap/SMA fee is 2.00% on an annual basis, or 0.50% quarterly from inception to 12/31/2023 and 0.17% monthly from 1/1/2024 to present.

All investments carry a certain degree of risk, including the possible loss of principal. Investments are also subject to political, market, currency and regulatory risks or economic developments. International investments involve special risks that may in particular cause a loss in principal, including currency fluctuation, lower liquidity, different accounting methods and economic and political systems, and higher transaction costs. These risks typically are greater in emerging markets. While Large-capitalization companies may have more stable prices than smaller, less established companies, they are still subject to equity securities risk. In addition, large-capitalization equity security prices may not rise as much as prices of equity securities of small-capitalization companies. Securities of small- and medium-sized companies tend to have a shorter history of operations and be more volatile and less liquid. Value stocks can perform differently from the market as a whole and other types of stocks. The material is provided for informational and/or educational purposes only and is not intended to be and should not be construed as investment, legal or tax advice and/or a legal opinion. Investors should consult their financial and tax adviser before making investments. The opinions referenced are as of the date of publication, may be modified due to changes in the market or economic conditions, and may not necessarily come to pass. Information and data presented has been developed internally and/or obtained from sources believed to be reliable. Aristotle Capital does not guarantee the accuracy, adequacy or completeness of such information.

Aristotle Capital Management, LLC is an independent investment adviser registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended. Registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training. More information about Aristotle Capital, including our investment strategies, fees and objectives, can be found in our Form ADV Part 2, which is available upon request. ACM-2610-126

Performance Disclosures

Sources: CAPS CompositeHubTM, MSCI

The Aristotle Global Equity WM Composite has an inception date of December 1, 2010. As of 1/1/2024, the composite was renamed from the Global Equity Advisory Composite.

Past performance is not indicative of future results. The information provided should not be considered financial advice or a recommendation to purchase or sell any particular security or product. Performance results for periods greater than one year have been annualized.

Composite returns are presented pure gross and net of the maximum wrap fee and include the reinvestment of all income. Pure gross returns do not reflect the deduction of any trading costs or other fees and are supplemental to the net returns. Net returns are calculated by subtracting the highest applicable wrap/SMA fee, which includes trading costs and custodial fees, from the pure gross composite return. The highest applicable wrap/SMA fee is 2.00% on an annual basis, or 0.50% quarterly from inception to 12/31/2023 and 0.17% monthly from 1/1/2024 to present.

Index Disclosures

The MSCI ACWI Index captures large and mid cap representation across Developed Markets (DM) and Emerging Markets (EM) countries. The index covers approximately 85% of the global investable equity opportunity set. The MSCI ACWI Equal Weighted Index represents an alternative weighting scheme to its market capitalization-weighted parent index, the MSCI ACWI. The Index includes the same constituents as its parent. However, at each quarterly rebalance date, all index constituents are weighted equally, effectively removing the influence of each constituent’s current price (high or low). The MSCI World Index captures large and mid cap representation across Developed Markets (DM) countries. The index covers approximately 85% of the free float-adjusted market capitalization in each country. The MSCI Emerging Markets Index captures large and mid cap representation across Emerging Markets (EM) countries. The index covers approximately 85% of the free float-adjusted market capitalization in each country. The MSCI ACWI Growth Index captures large and mid cap securities exhibiting overall growth style characteristics across Developed Markets (DM) and Emerging Markets (EM) countries. The MSCI ACWI Value Index captures large and mid cap securities exhibiting overall value style characteristics across Developed Markets (DM) and Emerging Markets (EM) countries. The MSCI Europe Index captures large and mid cap representation across Developed Markets (DM) countries in Europe. The Index covers approximately 85% of the free float-adjusted market capitalization across the European Developed Markets equity universe.  The MSCI Japan Index is designed to measure the performance of the large and mid cap segments of the Japanese market. The Index covers approximately 85% of the free float-adjusted market capitalization in Japan. The S&P 500® Index is the Standard & Poor’s Composite Index and is a widely recognized, unmanaged index of common stock prices. It is market cap weighted and includes 500 leading companies, capturing approximately 80% coverage of available market capitalization. The S&P 500® Equal Weight Index is designed to be the size-neutral version of the S&P 500. It includes the same constituents as the market capitalization-weighted S&P 500, but each company in the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index is allocated the same weight at each quarterly rebalance. The Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond Index is a flagship measure of global investment grade debt from 27 local currency markets. This multi-currency benchmark includes treasury, government-related, corporate and securitized fixed-rate bonds from both developed and emerging markets issuers. The Brent Crude Oil Index is a major trading classification of sweet light crude oil that serves as a major benchmark price for purchases of oil worldwide. The volatility (beta) of the Composite may be greater or less than the benchmarks. It is not possible to invest directly in these indexes.

At Aristotle Atlantic Partners, LLC (Aristotle Atlantic), a pillar of our investment process is identifying secular themes. These are long-term trends characterized by significant, multi-year shifts in spending patterns driven by consumers, governments, or corporations. In September 2020, we published a white paper introducing personalized medicine as one of these themes. In the six years since, several regulatory, clinical, and commercial milestones have provided meaningful support to our thesis and broadened the associated investment opportunity set. This Thought Piece is intended to update investors on how our thinking has evolved.

To read the full thought piece, please use the link below. 

(All MSCI index returns are shown net and in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.)

Markets Review

Sources: CAPS CompositeHubTM, Bloomberg
Past performance is not indicative of future results. Aristotle Global Equity Composite returns are presented gross and net of model fees and include the reinvestment of all income. Gross returns will be reduced by fees and other expenses that may be incurred in the management of the account. Net returns are calculated by subtracting a model fee of 0.50% on an annual basis or 0.04167% on a monthly basis.
Please see important disclosures at the end of this document.

Shocks to energy prices stemming from renewed conflict in the Middle East, changing interest rate expectations, trade tensions, and enthusiasm (and fear) surrounding artificial intelligence (even among companies outside the United States) have become recurring themes of the market environment. Though global equity markets continue to climb, macroeconomic headlines seem to draw investors toward certain industries and away from others regardless of business fundamentals.

Brent crude, for example, started the year at roughly $60 per barrel and nearly doubled by May, then dropped back to ~$70 in July, only to spike back up above $100 later in the third quarter. Turning to central bank policy, following an unprecedented tightening cycle that concluded in 2023, the U.S. Federal Reserve cut interest rates six times in 2024 and 2025 before reversing course in the most recent quarter, joining several European central banks in raising rates. As governments in the developed world face a mix of fiscal deficits and stubborn inflation, longer-dated sovereign bond yields are climbing as well.

Against this backdrop, we believe it is particularly important to distinguish between businesses whose financial outcomes are dependent on prevailing macro conditions and those capable of succeeding across a range of environments. We recognize that “quality” is an over-used term—and often used too broadly—across the investment industry. For us, it is important to distinguish among three distinct forms of quality:

  • Transient Quality can look exceptional at the peak of a cycle, with scarcity-driven pricing power, expanding margins and high returns on capital. On the surface the economics can appear highly attractive, but when supply eventually catches up, prices normalize and investors realize what has happened, significant valuation resets can occur.
  • Conventional Quality possesses many of the characteristics traditionally associated with great businesses—powerful brands, customer loyalty, incumbency advantages and ecosystem lock-in—but the old moats are eroding. Digital advertising, ecommerce, private label, low barriers to entry and technological disruption have made certain franchises less structurally resilient than they once were.
  • Durable Quality is where we are most energized because scarcity is permanent rather than cyclical (or at least less so). These businesses can raise prices ahead of inflation for years without impairing volume, protected by natural monopolies, geology, irreplaceable infrastructure, essentiality, regulation or deliberate scarcity. Consider businesses like luxury goods manufacturers, regulated utilities and mission-critical technology solutions, or specialty data providers, unique ingredient producers and transportation platforms.

By focusing on durable, high-quality businesses, we seek to look past short-term macroeconomic volatility and capitalize on the disconnects it can create between share prices and long-term earnings power. Importantly, we believe today’s environment continues to provide such opportunities, enabling us to selectively enhance the portfolio when we identify businesses offering a particularly compelling combination of quality, valuation and catalysts.

Performance and Attribution Summary

For the third quarter of 2026, Aristotle Capital’s Global Equity Composite posted a total return of 0.20% gross of fees (0.07% net of fees), underperforming the MSCI ACWI Index, which returned 1.60%, and the MSCI World Index, which returned 1.88%. Please refer to the table below for detailed performance.

Performance (%) 3Q26YTD1 Year3 Years5 Years10 Years Since Inception*
Global Equity Composite (gross)0.206.179.9914.357.1410.8710.20
Global Equity Composite (net)0.075.779.4413.796.6110.329.66
MSCI ACWI Index (net)1.6013.0316.7521.7311.5712.3810.40
MSCI World Index (net)1.8811.7515.2421.4011.8912.8111.09
*The inception date for the Global Equity Composite is November 1, 2010. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Aristotle Global Equity Composite returns are presented gross and net of model fees and include the reinvestment of all income. Gross returns will be reduced by fees and other expenses that may be incurred in the management of the account. Net returns are presented net of model fees. Net returns are calculated by subtracting a model fee of 0.50% on an annual basis or 0.04167% on a monthly basis, which includes trading costs and the reinvestment of all income. Please see important disclosures at the end of this document.

Source: FactSet
Past performance is not indicative of future results. Sector attribution shows how much of a portfolio’s overall return is directly attributable to stock selection and asset allocation decisions within the portfolio, highlighting which sectors contributed or detracted to the total return. Attribution includes the reinvestment of income. Attribution is presented gross of fees and does not include the deduction of all fees and expenses that a client or investor has paid or would have paid. Please refer to the gross and net composite returns included within to understand the overall impact of fees.

From a sector perspective, the portfolio’s underperformance relative to the MSCI ACWI Index can be attributed to both security selection and allocation effects. Security selection in Materials and Consumer Discretionary detracted the most from the portfolio’s relative performance. Security selection in Energy was another major detractor; however, the negative impact was largely offset by an overweight to the sector. Security selection in Financials and Industrials also contributed to relative return.

Regionally, security selection was responsible for the portfolio’s underperformance relative to the MSCI ACWI Index, while allocation effects contributed. Security selection in North America detracted the most from relative performance; security selection in Asia/Pacific ex-Japan contributed the most.

Contributors and Detractors for 3Q 2026

Relative ContributorsRelative Detractors
DBS GroupMartin Marietta Materials
ITOCHURentokil Initial
SonyMicrochip Technology
AmgenNorwegian Cruise Line Holdings
Mitsubishi UFJ FinancialBrookfield

Relative contributors and detractors are based on attribution total effect and exclude benchmark securities not held in the portfolio.

Rentokil Initial, the U.K.-based pest control and hygiene services company, was a significant detractor during the quarter. Shares declined following the company’s interim results as investors focused on weaker growth in portions of its North American pest control business and management’s decision to retire its previous 2027 North American margin target. Importantly, North American organic growth improved from the prior year, while customer retention and profitability also increased. Under newly appointed CEO Mike Duffy, the company has strengthened its North American leadership team and is undertaking a broader operational restructuring, with plans to reinvest cost savings into initiatives intended to accelerate organic growth rather than maximize near-term margins. While we continue to assess the new management team’s strategy and execution, we believe Rentokil’s scale, route density and recurring service model provide the company with meaningful competitive advantages.

Microchip Technology, the microcontroller (MCU) and analog semiconductor producer, was a detractor during the period. The company’s stock sold off despite continued evidence of improvement in its underlying business. Customer inventories continued to normalize and bookings remained strong, supporting a recovery in demand following the prolonged industry downturn. Higher factory utilization and disciplined expense management also contributed to improved profitability and cash flow generation. While management noted potential capacity constraints at certain external manufacturing partners, Microchip’s internal capacity remains sufficient to support its growth expectations. We believe the company’s broad product portfolio, long-standing customer relationships and commitment to extended product lifecycles position it well to benefit from a continued recovery in its core end markets, while growing opportunities in data centers and aerospace & defense provide additional avenues for long-term growth.

DBS Group, a leading Asian financial services company headquartered in Singapore, was the top contributor during the quarter. Shares rose following another strong earnings report, with record earnings supported by continued growth in wealth management and other fee-based businesses, as well as resilient net interest income despite lower local interest rates. The company continues to benefit from growing wealth creation across Asia, while its strong capital position has supported increased shareholder distributions and disciplined capital allocation. We believe DBS’s strong market position, diversified sources of earnings and disciplined capital allocation support attractive long-term returns.

Amgen, the biopharmaceutical company, was one of the largest contributors during the quarter. The company has continued to benefit from growth across several newer and expanding medicines, including Repatha (cholesterol), Evenity (osteoporosis), Tezspire (asthma) and Uplizna (rare autoimmune diseases), while also emphasizing clinical developments across its pipeline. While Amgen faces increasing biosimilar competition for several of its mature biologic therapies, the company is also benefiting from opportunities in the growing biosimilars market. Leveraging its biologics expertise and global manufacturing scale, the company has generated more than $15 billion in biosimilar sales since 2018, with additional candidates in development. We believe the breadth of Amgen’s portfolio and improving research productivity, combined with its ability to capitalize on its global commercial and manufacturing infrastructure, position the company to benefit as its pipeline develops.

Recent Portfolio Activity

BuysSells
E Ink Holdings*Assa Abloy
McKessonOshkosh

During the quarter, we sold our positions in Assa Abloy and Oshkosh and purchased E Ink Holdings and McKesson.

We first purchased Assa Abloy, the world’s largest provider of door opening and entrance solutions, in 2016. Over our investment period, the company strengthened its leading position in a fragmented industry, benefiting from significant replacement and upgrade demand, as well as the growing adoption of higher-value electromechanical and digital access solutions. The company also continued to build on its long track record of acquiring businesses and creating additional value through integration, operational improvement and access to its global platform. More recently, however, we believe the opportunity for incremental value creation through M&A has become less compelling, while opportunities to further optimize the company’s existing portfolio appear unlikely. As such, we chose to exit our position and redeploy capital into opportunities we believe offer a more attractive combination of valuation and catalysts. (*E Ink does not offer an ADR or GDR and was purchased only in accounts registered to trade on the Taiwan Stock Exchange. For those accounts unable to purchase E Ink, Assa Abloy continues to be held as a replacement.)

We first invested in Oshkosh, a manufacturer of specialty vehicles and access equipment, in the third quarter of 2013. During our holding period, we believe the company executed well on many of the catalysts we had identified, including improved profitability through pricing discipline, manufacturing efficiencies, a more favorable business mix, continued product innovation and the ramp-up of production of the U.S. Postal Service’s Next Generation Delivery Vehicle program. Given the progress, we chose to sell our position and redeploy the proceeds into what we believe is a more attractive opportunity in McKesson.

Headquartered in Hsinchu, Taiwan, E Ink is the global leader in electronic paper (“ePaper”) display technology. Unlike traditional LCD or OLED screens, ePaper uses electrically charged color pigments to create a paper-like display that reflects ambient light and only requires power when an image changes. These characteristics allow ePaper displays to remain visible for extended periods while consuming very little energy, making the technology particularly well-suited for applications such as eReaders, electronic shelf labels (“ESLs”), eNotes and digital signage. E Ink holds an estimated 80%-90% share of the global ePaper display market and is currently the only manufacturer capable of mass-producing high-quality ePaper technology at scale.

Historically, E Ink was best known for supplying the displays used in eReaders such as Amazon’s Kindle and Rakuten’s Kobo. However, the business is increasingly being driven by ESLs—digital price tags that allow retailers to remotely update prices, promotions and product information across stores in real time. ESLs can reduce the labor associated with manually replacing paper labels, improve pricing accuracy and increasingly support inventory management and order fulfillment. E Ink does not manufacture the finished labels; rather, it supplies its proprietary ePaper material to leading ESL manufacturers, allowing the company to participate broadly in the growth of the market without competing in the more commoditized assembly business.

Some of the quality characteristics we have identified for E Ink include:

  • A dominant position in ePaper displays, supported by proprietary technology, extensive intellectual property and decades of research and development;
  • Significant barriers to entry arising from the technical complexity of ePaper manufacturing and the need for consistent product quality, scale and established relationships with leading device manufacturers and ESL solution providers; and
  • A strong financial profile, including a net cash balance sheet and attractive returns on capital.

We believe shares trade at a meaningful discount to our estimate of intrinsic value based on E Ink’s normalized earnings potential. Our analysis reflects the company’s long runway for growth across ePaper applications while recognizing the established earnings contribution from eReaders and eNotes.

Catalysts we have identified for E Ink, which we believe will cause its stock price to appreciate over our three- to five-year investment horizon, include:

  • Continued adoption of ESL, particularly in the underpenetrated U.S. market, as retailers automate price changes, to reduce manual labor requirements and better integrate physical stores with inventory and order-management systems;
  • Improving business mix as higher-margin ESL and other IoT applications become a larger portion of revenue, supporting higher normalized margins and returns over time;
  • Growing replacement and upgrade demand as earlier ESL installations are refreshed with newer generations of the technology; and
  • Expansion of ePaper into digital signage, supported by growing adoption of E Ink’s color technologies across retail, advertising and other commercial applications.

Headquartered in Irving, Texas, and founded in 1833, McKesson is the market leader in U.S. pharmaceutical distribution. The company serves as a critical intermediary within the healthcare system, sourcing branded, generic, specialty, biosimilar and over-the-counter pharmaceuticals from manufacturers and delivering them to retail pharmacies, hospitals, health systems, physician practices, long-term care providers and other healthcare customers. Together with Cardinal Health and Cencora, McKesson is one of three dominant national pharmaceutical distributors that collectively account for more than 90% of the U.S. market.

McKesson’s role extends well beyond the physical distribution of pharmaceuticals. The company manages sourcing and inventory to help ensure reliable product availability, provides technology solutions, and helps manufacturers efficiently reach thousands of healthcare providers through a scaled distribution network. Over time, the company has expanded further into higher-value healthcare services, including oncology and multispecialty practice solutions, biopharma services, and prescription technology solutions that help improve medication access, affordability and adherence.

Some of the quality characteristics we have identified for McKesson include:

  • Mission-critical distribution capabilities that are difficult to replicate, supported by national scale, extensive infrastructure and regulatory expertise;
  • Long-standing customer relationships and multi-year distribution agreements that create meaningful switching costs and deepen McKesson’s role within the U.S. healthcare system;
  • Attractive underlying economics, including what we consider to be strong returns on invested capital and FREE cash flow generation, supported by limited capital requirements and favorable working-capital dynamics; and
  • Resilient demand characteristics, as prescription drug utilization is largely non-discretionary and less sensitive to broader macroeconomic cycles.

We believe shares of McKesson are attractively valued given our estimates of normalized earnings. In our view, the company’s low reported distribution margins understate the attractive economics of its core pharmaceutical distribution business, while its growing higher-margin businesses in Oncology & Multispecialty, biopharma services and Prescription Technology Solutions should support higher normalized earnings and FREE cash flow over time.

Catalysts we have identified for McKesson, which we believe will cause its stock price to appreciate over our three- to five-year investment horizon, include:

  • Continued expansion of the Oncology & Multispecialty segment through additional physician practices and a growing suite of services spanning drug distribution, technology, clinical research and practice management;
  • Continued growth in biopharma services and Prescription Technology Solutions, as McKesson helps manufacturers, providers, pharmacies and patients improve medication access, affordability and adherence;
  • Expansion of McKesson’s oncology practice-management capabilities into adjacent specialties, such as ophthalmology, through targeted acquisitions and internal investment;
  • Ongoing expansion of NorthStar Rx (McKesson’s own private-label generic pharmaceutical business) into biosimilars, leveraging its established oncology relationships as biosimilar adoption grows; and
  • Ongoing progress toward the separation of Medical-Surgical Solutions, allowing management to focus capital and resources on McKesson’s higher-return businesses.

Conclusion

Periods of relative underperformance can test conviction, particularly when market leadership is narrow and rapidly changing. However, we believe the appropriate response is not to chase what has recently worked but to remain focused on the long-term drivers of value creation. This discipline has guided our investment process across multiple market cycles and continues to shape how we position the portfolio today.

Importantly, recent performance has not been accompanied by a deterioration in the businesses we own. In many cases, earnings have continued to grow even as valuation multiples have compressed, creating what we believe is an increasingly attractive disconnect between share prices and normalized earnings power. While periods like this are challenging, they can also create opportunity for long-term investors. We believe the very conditions that have challenged recent relative performance have strengthened the portfolio’s prospective return potential.

Disclosures

The opinions expressed herein are those of Aristotle Capital Management, LLC (Aristotle Capital) and are subject to change without notice. Past performance is not a guarantee or indicator of future results. This material is not financial advice or an offer to buy or sell any product. You should not assume that any of the securities transactions, sectors or holdings discussed in this report were or will be profitable, or that recommendations Aristotle Capital makes in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of the securities listed in this report. The portfolio characteristics shown relate to the Aristotle Global Equity strategy. Not every client’s account will have these characteristics. Aristotle Capital reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs. There is no assurance that any securities discussed herein will remain in an account’s portfolio at the time you receive this report or that securities sold have not been repurchased. The securities discussed may not represent an account’s entire portfolio and, in the aggregate, may represent only a small percentage of an account’s portfolio holdings. The performance attribution presented is of a representative account from Aristotle Capital’s Global Equity Composite. The representative account is a discretionary client account which was chosen to most closely reflect the investment style of the strategy. The criteria used for representative account selection is based on the account’s period of time under management and its similarity of holdings in relation to the strategy. Recommendations made in the last 12 months are available upon request.

Returns are presented gross and net of model fees and include the reinvestment of all income. Gross returns will be reduced by fees and other expenses that may be incurred in the management of the account. Net returns are presented net of model fees. Net returns are calculated by subtracting a model fee of .50% on an annual basis or .04167% on a monthly basis, which includes trading costs and the reinvestment of all income.

All investments carry a certain degree of risk, including the possible loss of principal. Investments are also subject to political, market, currency and regulatory risks or economic developments. International investments involve special risks that may in particular cause a loss in principal, including currency fluctuation, lower liquidity, different accounting methods and economic and political systems, and higher transaction costs. These risks typically are greater in emerging markets. While Large-capitalization companies may have more stable prices than smaller, less established companies, they are still subject to equity securities risk. In addition, large-capitalization equity security prices may not rise as much as prices of equity securities of small-capitalization companies. Securities of small- and medium-sized companies tend to have a shorter history of operations and be more volatile and less liquid. Value stocks can perform differently from the market as a whole and other types of stocks. The material is provided for informational and/or educational purposes only and is not intended to be and should not be construed as investment, legal or tax advice and/or a legal opinion. Investors should consult their financial and tax adviser before making investments. The opinions referenced are as of the date of publication, may be modified due to changes in the market or economic conditions, and may not necessarily come to pass. Information and data presented has been developed internally and/or obtained from sources believed to be reliable. Aristotle Capital does not guarantee the accuracy, adequacy or completeness of such information.

Aristotle Capital Management, LLC is an independent investment adviser registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended. Registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training. More information about Aristotle Capital, including our investment strategies, fees and objectives, can be found in our Form ADV Part 2, which is available upon request. ACM-2610-50

Performance Disclosures

Sources: CAPS CompositeHubTM, MSCI

MSCI ACWI (Net) was stated as the primary benchmark on June 1, 2024 and MSCI World (Net) became the secondary benchmark. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The information provided should not be considered financial advice or a recommendation to purchase or sell any particular security or product. Performance results for periods greater than one year have been annualized. The Aristotle Global Equity Composite has an inception date of November 1, 2010; however, the strategy initially began at Howard Gleicher’s predecessor firm in July 2007. A non-ported performance track record from January 1, 2008 through October 31, 2010 is provided above and is not GIPS compliant. The performance results were achieved while Mr. Gleicher managed the strategy at a prior firm. The returns are those of a publicly available mutual fund from the fund’s inception through Mr. Gleicher’s departure from the firm. During that time, Mr. Gleicher had primary responsibility for managing the fund.

Composite and extended returns are presented gross and net of model fees and include the reinvestment of all income. Gross returns will be reduced by fees and other expenses that may be incurred in the management of the account. Net returns are presented net of model fees. Net returns are calculated by subtracting a model fee of 0.50% on an annual basis or 0.04167% on a monthly basis, which includes trading costs and the reinvestment of all income.

Index Disclosures

The MSCI ACWI Index captures large and mid cap representation across Developed Markets (DM) and Emerging Markets (EM) countries. The index covers approximately 85% of the global investable equity opportunity set. The MSCI ACWI Equal Weighted Index represents an alternative weighting scheme to its market capitalization-weighted parent index, the MSCI ACWI. The Index includes the same constituents as its parent. However, at each quarterly rebalance date, all index constituents are weighted equally, effectively removing the influence of each constituent’s current price (high or low). The MSCI World Index captures large and mid cap representation across Developed Markets (DM) countries. The index covers approximately 85% of the free float-adjusted market capitalization in each country. The MSCI Emerging Markets Index captures large and mid cap representation across Emerging Markets (EM) countries. The index covers approximately 85% of the free float-adjusted market capitalization in each country. The MSCI ACWI Growth Index captures large and mid cap securities exhibiting overall growth style characteristics across Developed Markets (DM) and Emerging Markets (EM) countries. The MSCI ACWI Value Index captures large and mid cap securities exhibiting overall value style characteristics across Developed Markets (DM) and Emerging Markets (EM) countries. The MSCI Europe Index captures large and mid cap representation across Developed Markets (DM) countries in Europe. The Index covers approximately 85% of the free float-adjusted market capitalization across the European Developed Markets equity universe.  The MSCI Japan Index is designed to measure the performance of the large and mid cap segments of the Japanese market. The Index covers approximately 85% of the free float-adjusted market capitalization in Japan. The S&P 500® Index is the Standard & Poor’s Composite Index and is a widely recognized, unmanaged index of common stock prices. It is market cap weighted and includes 500 leading companies, capturing approximately 80% coverage of available market capitalization. The S&P 500® Equal Weight Index is designed to be the size-neutral version of the S&P 500. It includes the same constituents as the market capitalization-weighted S&P 500, but each company in the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index is allocated the same weight at each quarterly rebalance. The Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond Index is a flagship measure of global investment grade debt from 27 local currency markets. This multi-currency benchmark includes treasury, government-related, corporate and securitized fixed-rate bonds from both developed and emerging markets issuers. The Brent Crude Oil Index is a major trading classification of sweet light crude oil that serves as a major benchmark price for purchases of oil worldwide. The volatility (beta) of the Composite may be greater or less than the benchmarks. It is not possible to invest directly in these indexes.

(All MSCI index returns are shown net and in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.)

Markets Review

Sources: CAPS CompositeHubTM, Bloomberg
Past performance is not indicative of future results. Aristotle International Equity ADR Composite returns are presented gross and net of model fees and include the reinvestment of all income. Gross returns will be reduced by fees and other expenses that may be incurred in the management of the account. Net returns are calculated by subtracting a model fee of 0.50% on an annual basis or 0.04167% on a monthly basis, which includes trading costs and the revinvestment of all income. Please see important disclosures at the end of this document.

Shocks to energy prices stemming from renewed conflict in the Middle East, changing interest rate expectations, trade tensions, and enthusiasm (and fear) surrounding artificial intelligence (even among companies outside the United States) have become recurring themes of the market environment. Though global equity markets continue to climb, macroeconomic headlines seem to draw investors towards certain industries and away from others regardless of business fundamentals.

Brent crude, for example, started the year at roughly $60 per barrel and nearly doubled by May, then dropped back to ~$70 in July, only to spike back up above $100 later in the third quarter.  Turning to central bank policy, following an unprecedented tightening cycle that concluded in 2023, the U.S. Federal Reserve cut interest rates six times in 2024 and 2025 before reversing course in the most recent quarter, joining several European central banks in raising rates. As governments in the developed world face a mix of fiscal deficits and stubborn inflation, longer-dated sovereign bond yields are climbing as well.

Against this backdrop, we believe it is particularly important to distinguish between businesses whose financial outcomes are dependent on prevailing macro conditions and those capable of succeeding across a range of environments. We recognize that “quality” is an over-used term—and often used too broadly—across the investment industry. For us, it is important to distinguish among three distinct forms of quality:

  • Transient Quality can look exceptional at the peak of a cycle, with scarcity-driven pricing power, expanding margins and high returns on capital. On the surface the economics can appear highly attractive, but when supply eventually catches up, prices normalize and investors realize what has happened, significant valuation resets can occur.
  • Conventional Quality possesses many of the characteristics traditionally associated with great businesses—powerful brands, customer loyalty, incumbency advantages and ecosystem lock-in—but the old moats are eroding. Digital advertising, ecommerce, private label, low barriers to entry and technological disruption have made certain franchises less structurally resilient than they once were.
  • Durable Quality is where we are most energized because scarcity is permanent rather than cyclical (or at least less so). These businesses can raise prices ahead of inflation for years without impairing volume, protected by natural monopolies, geology, irreplaceable infrastructure, essentiality, regulation or deliberate scarcity. Consider businesses like luxury goods manufacturers, regulated utilities and mission-critical technology solutions, or specialty data providers, unique ingredient producers and transportation platforms.

By focusing on durable quality, we seek to look beyond the whipsaw of macroeconomic events and capitalize on the disconnects they can create between share prices and long-term normalized earnings power. Importantly, we believe today’s environment continues to provide such opportunities, enabling us to selectively enhance the portfolio when we identify businesses offering a particularly compelling combination of quality, valuation and catalysts.

Performance and Attribution Summary

For the third quarter of 2026, Aristotle Capital’s International Equity ADR Composite posted a total return of -0.42% gross of fees (-0.54% net of fees), underperforming the MSCI EAFE Index, which returned 0.81%, and the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index, which returned 0.48%. Please refer to the table below for detailed performance.

Performance (%) 3Q26YTD1 Year3 Years5 Years10 Years Since Inception*
International Equity ADR Composite (gross)-0.422.868.8014.496.918.617.38
International Equity ADR Composite (net)-0.542.488.2613.936.388.086.84
MSCI EAFE Index (net)0.8110.3315.6918.409.329.077.43
MSCI ACWI ex USA Index (net)0.4814.2220.0020.549.559.257.32
*The inception date for the International Equity ADR Composite is June 1, 2013. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Aristotle International Equity ADR Composite returns are presented gross and net of model fees and include the reinvestment of all income. Gross returns will be reduced by fees and other expenses that may be incurred in the management of the account. Net returns are calculated by subtracting a model fee of 0.50% on an annual basis or 0.04167% on a monthly basis, which includes trading costs and the reinvestment of all income. Please see important disclosures at the end of this document.

Source: FactSet
Past performance is not indicative of future results. Sector attribution shows how much of a portfolio’s overall return is directly attributable to stock selection and asset allocation decisions within the portfolio, highlighting which sectors contributed or detracted to the total return. Attribution includes the reinvestment of income. Attribution is presented gross of fees and does not include the deduction of all fees and expenses that a client or investor has paid or would have paid. Please refer to the gross and net composite returns included within to understand the overall impact of fees.

From a sector perspective, the portfolio’s underperformance relative to the MSCI EAFE Index can be attributed to security selection while allocation effects contributed. Security selection in Industrials, Energy and Financials detracted most from the portfolio’s relative performance. Conversely, security selection in and an underweight in Information Technology, as well as security selection in Health Care, contributed.

Regionally, allocation effects were responsible for the portfolio’s underperformance while security selection contributed. Security selection in Developed Asia and exposure to Canada detracted most from relative performance, while security selection and an underweight in Developed Europe & Middle East contributed.

Contributors and Detractors for 3Q 2026

Relative ContributorsRelative Detractors
DBS GroupBrookfield
ING GroepCameco
AccentureRentokil Initial
SonyFast Retailing
DSM-FirmenichFANUC

Relative contributors and detractors are based on attribution total effect and exclude benchmark securities not held in the portfolio.

Cameco, one of the world’s largest uranium producers, was a primary detractor during the quarter. The company’s stock sold off amid concerns that disruptions at its Canadian uranium operations (including Cigar Lake, McArthur River and Key Lake) would temporarily dampen near-term production. Despite these challenges, the company maintained its annual production outlook, while average realized prices continued to improve and long-term uranium prices reached decade highs. Cameco’s extensive use of long-term contracts, combined with the production flexibility of its tier-one assets, helps insulate the business from short-term commodity price fluctuations and operational volatility. We believe the company remains well-positioned to benefit from growing global demand for nuclear energy through its high-quality uranium assets, fuel services capabilities and ownership interest in Westinghouse.

Rentokil Initial, the U.K.-based pest control and hygiene services company, was a detractor during the quarter. Shares declined following the company’s interim results as investors focused on weaker growth in portions of its North American pest control business and management’s decision to retire its previous 2027 North American margin target. Importantly, North American organic growth improved from the prior year, while customer retention and profitability also increased. Under newly appointed CEO Mike Duffy, the company has strengthened its North American leadership team and is undertaking a broader operational restructuring, with plans to reinvest cost savings into initiatives intended to accelerate organic growth rather than maximize near-term margins. While we continue to assess the new management team’s strategy and execution, we believe Rentokil’s scale, route density and recurring service model provide the company with meaningful competitive advantages.

DBS Group, a leading Asian financial services company headquartered in Singapore, was a top contributor during the quarter. Shares rose following another strong earnings report, with record earnings supported by continued growth in wealth management and other fee-based businesses, as well as resilient net interest income despite lower local interest rates. The company continues to benefit from growing wealth creation across Asia, while its strong capital position has supported increased shareholder distributions and disciplined capital allocation. We believe DBS’s strong market position, diversified sources of earnings and disciplined capital allocation support attractive long-term returns.

Accenture, a leading technology consulting and managed services company, was a primary contributor during the quarter after being the strategy’s largest detractor during the first half of the year. Shares rallied as investor sentiment improved following significant concerns about the potential impact of artificial intelligence on traditional consulting and technology services. While market perceptions of AI’s impact on the industry have shifted considerably, our focus has remained on the underlying business and Accenture’s ability to create value for its clients. For decades, the company’s deep industry expertise, longstanding client relationships, and broad technology ecosystem positioned it to help enterprises integrate new technologies and redesign increasingly complex business processes. The latest wave of technological innovation is no different. We believe these capabilities become more valuable, rather than less, as the pace of technological change accelerates and Accenture becomes mission critical to global enterprises seeking to evolve, adapt and grow.

Recent Portfolio Activity

BuysSells
WEGMichelin

During the quarter, we sold our position in Michelin and invested in WEG.

We initially invested in Michelin, one of the world’s largest tire manufacturers, in the first quarter of 2021. In our view, the company benefits from a strong competitive position driven by its global scale, brand strength and continued leadership in cutting-edge tire technology. During our ownership, Michelin made progress on several of the catalysts we had identified, including shifting its product mix toward higher-margin specialty and large-diameter tires, while pursuing initiatives to improve operating efficiency and expand into higher-growth businesses. However, our ongoing research, including work on Michelin’s competitors, led us to reassess some elements of our original investment thesis as competitive dynamics evolved and the opportunity for further profitability improvements became less certain. As a result, we chose to exit our position to fund what we believe is a more compelling opportunity in WEG.

Headquartered in Jaraguá do Sul, Brazil, and founded in 1961, WEG is a global electrical equipment manufacturer that has evolved from a Brazilian electric motor producer into a diversified industrial platform. The company makes equipment that helps generate, transmit, convert, control and use electricity across industrial and infrastructure applications, including motors, drives, automation systems, transformers, generators and alternators. These products serve end markets such as manufacturing, mining, oil and gas, water infrastructure, utilities, renewable energy, and data centers, giving WEG exposure to both traditional industrial demand and longer-term investment in electrification, grid modernization and automation.

WEG’s differentiation lies less in the product categories themselves than in the operating model it has built around them. Motors, transformers and other electrical equipment markets can be cyclical, competitive and capital intensive, but WEG has historically generated attractive profitability through vertical integration, engineering discipline, cost control and a long-term reinvestment culture. Its roots in southern Brazil, a region with a strong engineering and manufacturing tradition, have helped shape this operating culture. In our opinion, this model has allowed the company to expand from a strong Brazilian base into international markets while maintaining attractive returns and a strong balance sheet.

Some of the quality characteristics we have identified for WEG include:

  • A vertically integrated manufacturing model that supports cost efficiency, quality control, product customization and supply-chain reliability;
  • Significant scale and established market positions across core product categories, including global leadership in low-voltage industrial motors and a dominant position in Latin American transformers;
  • A long-term ownership culture, with the founding families retaining a controlling interest and supporting continued reinvestment in the business; and
  • A strong financial profile, including a net cash balance sheet and a long track record of growth, with only one year of negative revenue growth over the past 15 years.

We believe shares of WEG are attractively valued given our estimates of normalized earnings. In our view, the company’s long-term opportunities for international expansion, additional manufacturing capacity and market share gains are not fully reflected in its current valuation, as investor attention remains focused on near-term uncertainty surrounding tariffs, renewable energy demand and Brazil-related macroeconomic volatility.

Catalysts we have identified for WEG, which we believe will cause its stock price to appreciate over our three- to five-year investment horizon, include:

  • Continued expansion beyond Brazil, particularly in motors, transformers, alternators and automation, as WEG builds scale and market share in international markets;
  • Further localization and vertical integration of manufacturing capacity, supporting customer service, supply-chain efficiency and WEG’s ability to replicate its operating model outside of Brazil;
  • Continued integration and improvement of acquired businesses, including Marathon in motors and alternators and Crompton Greaves Power Systems in transformers, as WEG applies its manufacturing discipline and reinvestment model to these platforms; and
  • Expansion of transformer manufacturing capacity, including planned capacity additions through 2028, supported by demand for grid investment, electrification and data center-related electrical infrastructure.

Conclusion

Periods of relative underperformance can test conviction, particularly when market leadership is narrow and rapidly changing. However, we believe the appropriate response is not to chase what has recently worked but to remain focused on the long-term drivers of value creation. This discipline has guided our investment process across multiple market cycles and continues to shape how we position the portfolio today.

Importantly, recent performance has not been accompanied by a deterioration in the businesses we own. In many cases, earnings have continued to grow even as valuation multiples have compressed, creating what we believe is an increasingly attractive disconnect between share prices and normalized earnings power. While periods like this are challenging, they can also create opportunity for long-term investors. We believe the very conditions that have challenged recent relative performance have strengthened the portfolio’s prospective return potential.

Disclosures

The opinions expressed herein are those of Aristotle Capital Management, LLC (Aristotle Capital) and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to buy or sell any product. You should not assume that any of the securities transactions, sectors or holdings discussed in this report were or will be profitable, or that recommendations Aristotle Capital makes in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of the securities listed in this report. The portfolio characteristics shown relate to the Aristotle International Equity ADR strategy. Not every client’s account will have these characteristics. Aristotle Capital reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs. There is no assurance that any securities discussed herein will remain in an account’s portfolio at the time you receive this report or that securities sold have not been repurchased. The securities discussed may not represent an account’s entire portfolio and, in the aggregate, may represent only a small percentage of an account’s portfolio holdings. The performance attribution presented is of a representative account from Aristotle Capital’s International Equity ADR Composite. The representative account is a discretionary client account which was chosen to most closely reflect the investment style of the strategy. The criteria used for representative account selection is based on the account’s period of time under management and its similarity of holdings in relation to the strategy. Recommendations made in the last 12 months are available upon request.

Past performance is not indicative of future results. Returns are presented gross and net of model fees and include the reinvestment of all income. Gross returns will be reduced by fees and other expenses that may be incurred in the management of the account. Net returns are presented net of model fees. Net returns are calculated by subtracting a model fee of .50% on an annual basis or .04167% on a monthly basis, which includes trading costs and the reinvestment of all income.

All investments carry a certain degree of risk, including the possible loss of principal. Investments are also subject to political, market, currency and regulatory risks or economic developments. International investments involve special risks that may in particular cause a loss in principal, including currency fluctuation, lower liquidity, different accounting methods and economic and political systems, and higher transaction costs. These risks typically are greater in emerging markets. While Large-capitalization companies may have more stable prices than smaller, less established companies, they are still subject to equity securities risk. In addition, large-capitalization equity security prices may not rise as much as prices of equity securities of small-capitalization companies. Securities of small- and medium-sized companies tend to have a shorter history of operations and be more volatile and less liquid. Value stocks can perform differently from the market as a whole and other types of stocks. The material is provided for informational and/or educational purposes only and is not intended to be and should not be construed as investment, legal or tax advice and/or a legal opinion. Investors should consult their financial and tax adviser before making investments. The opinions referenced are as of the date of publication, may be modified due to changes in the market or economic conditions, and may not necessarily come to pass. Information and data presented has been developed internally and/or obtained from sources believed to be reliable. Aristotle Capital does not guarantee the accuracy, adequacy or completeness of such information.

Aristotle Capital Management, LLC is an independent registered investment adviser under the Advisers Act of 1940, as amended. Registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training. More information about Aristotle Capital, including our investment strategies, fees and objectives, can be found in our Form ADV Part 2, which is available upon request. ACM-2610-61

Performance Disclosures

Sources: CAPS CompositeHubTM, MSCI

Past performance is not indicative of future results. The information provided should not be considered financial advice or a recommendation to purchase or sell any particular security or product. Performance results for periods greater than one year have been annualized. Returns are presented gross and net of model fees and include the reinvestment of all income. Gross returns will be reduced by fees and other expenses that may be incurred in the management of the account. Net returns are presented net of model fees. Net returns are calculated by subtracting a model fee of 0.50% on an annual basis or 0.04167% on a monthly basis, which includes trading costs and the reinvestment of all income.

Index Disclosures

The MSCI EAFE Index (Europe, Australasia, Far East) is an equity index which captures large and mid cap representation across Developed Markets (DM) countries around the world, excluding the US and Canada. The index covers approximately 85% of the free float-adjusted market capitalization in each country The MSCI ACWI Index captures large and mid cap representation across Developed Markets (DM) and Emerging Markets (EM) countries. The index covers approximately 85% of the global investable equity opportunity set. The MSCI ACWI ex USA Index captures large and mid cap representation across Developed Markets (DM) countries (excluding the US) and Emerging Markets (EM) countries. The index covers approximately 85% of the global equity opportunity set outside the United States. The MSCI Emerging Markets Index captures large and mid cap representation across Emerging Markets (EM) countries. The index covers approximately 85% of the free float-adjusted market capitalization in each country. The S&P 500 Index is the Standard & Poor’s Composite Index and is a widely recognized, unmanaged index of common stock prices. It is market cap weighted and includes 500 leading companies, capturing approximately 80% coverage of available market capitalization. The Brent Crude Oil Index is a major trading classification of sweet light crude oil that serves as a major benchmark price for purchases of oil worldwide. The Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond Index is a flagship measure of global investment grade debt from 27 local currency markets. This multi-currency benchmark includes treasury, government-related, corporate and securitized fixed-rate bonds from both developed and emerging markets issuers. The MSCI Europe Index captures large and mid cap representation across Developed Markets (DM) countries in Europe. The Index covers approximately 85% of the free float-adjusted market capitalization across the European Developed Markets equity universe. These indexes have been selected as the benchmarks and are used for comparison purposes only. The volatility (beta) of the Composite may be greater or less than the respective benchmarks. It is not possible to invest directly in these indexes.

For more on International Equity, access the latest resources.

(All MSCI index returns are shown net and in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.)

Markets Review

Sources: CAPS CompositeHubTM, Bloomberg
Past performance is not indicative of future results. Aristotle International Equity ADR WM Composite returns are presented pure gross and net of the maximum wrap fee and include the reinvestment of all income. Pure gross returns do not reflect the deduction of any trading costs or other fees and are supplemental to the net returns. Net returns are calculated by subtracting the highest applicable wrap/SMA fee, which includes trading costs and custodial fees, from the pure gross composite return (From inception to 12/31/2015, the highest applicable wrap/SMA fee is 3.00% on an annual basis, or 0.75% quarterly. From 1/1/2016 to 12/31/2023, the highest applicable wrap/SMA fee is 2.00% on an annual basis, or 0.50% quarterly and 0.17% monthly from 1/1/2024 to present.) Please see important disclosures at the end of this document.

Shocks to energy prices stemming from renewed conflict in the Middle East, changing interest rate expectations, trade tensions, and enthusiasm (and fear) surrounding artificial intelligence (even among companies outside the United States) have become recurring themes of the market environment. Though global equity markets continue to climb, macroeconomic headlines seem to draw investors towards certain industries and away from others regardless of business fundamentals.

Brent crude, for example, started the year at roughly $60 per barrel and nearly doubled by May, then dropped back to ~$70 in July, only to spike back up above $100 later in the third quarter.  Turning to central bank policy, following an unprecedented tightening cycle that concluded in 2023, the U.S. Federal Reserve cut interest rates six times in 2024 and 2025 before reversing course in the most recent quarter, joining several European central banks in raising rates. As governments in the developed world face a mix of fiscal deficits and stubborn inflation, longer-dated sovereign bond yields are climbing as well.

Against this backdrop, we believe it is particularly important to distinguish between businesses whose financial outcomes are dependent on prevailing macro conditions and those capable of succeeding across a range of environments. We recognize that “quality” is an over-used term—and often used too broadly—across the investment industry. For us, it is important to distinguish among three distinct forms of quality:

  • Transient Quality can look exceptional at the peak of a cycle, with scarcity-driven pricing power, expanding margins and high returns on capital. On the surface the economics can appear highly attractive, but when supply eventually catches up, prices normalize and investors realize what has happened, significant valuation resets can occur.
  • Conventional Quality possesses many of the characteristics traditionally associated with great businesses—powerful brands, customer loyalty, incumbency advantages and ecosystem lock-in—but the old moats are eroding. Digital advertising, ecommerce, private label, low barriers to entry and technological disruption have made certain franchises less structurally resilient than they once were.
  • Durable Quality is where we are most energized because scarcity is permanent rather than cyclical (or at least less so). These businesses can raise prices ahead of inflation for years without impairing volume, protected by natural monopolies, geology, irreplaceable infrastructure, essentiality, regulation or deliberate scarcity. Consider businesses like luxury goods manufacturers, regulated utilities and mission-critical technology solutions, or specialty data providers, unique ingredient producers and transportation platforms.

By focusing on durable quality, we seek to look beyond the whipsaw of macroeconomic events and capitalize on the disconnects they can create between share prices and long-term normalized earnings power. Importantly, we believe today’s environment continues to provide such opportunities, enabling us to selectively enhance the portfolio when we identify businesses offering a particularly compelling combination of quality, valuation and catalysts.

Performance and Attribution Summary

For the third quarter of 2026, Aristotle Capital’s International Equity ADR WM Composite posted a total return of 0.07% pure gross of fees (-0.43% net of fees), underperforming the MSCI EAFE Index, which returned 0.81%, and the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index, which returned 0.48%. Please refer to the table below for detailed performance.

Performance (%) 3Q26YTD1 Year3 Years5 Years10 Years Since Inception*
International Equity ADR WM Composite (pure gross)0.073.9710.0114.797.088.758.63
International Equity ADR WM Composite (net)-0.432.447.8712.564.976.606.30
MSCI EAFE Index (net)0.8110.3315.6918.409.329.078.50
MSCI ACWI ex USA Index (net)0.4814.2220.0020.549.559.258.13
*The inception date for the International Equity ADR WM Composite is 7/1/2012. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Aristotle International Equity ADR WM Composite returns are presented pure gross and net of the maximum wrap fee and include the reinvestment of all income. Pure gross returns do not reflect the deduction of any trading costs or other fees and are supplemental to the net returns. Net returns are calculated by subtracting the highest applicable wrap/SMA fee, which includes trading costs and custodial fees, from the pure gross composite return. (From inception to 12/31/2015, the highest applicable wrap/SMA fee is 3.00% on an annual basis, or 0.75% quarterly. From 1/1/2016 to 12/31/2023, the highest applicable wrap/SMA fee is 2.00% on an annual basis, or 0.50% quarterly and 0.17% monthly from 1/1/2024 to present.) Please see important disclosures at the end of this document.

Source: FactSet
Past performance is not indicative of future results. Sector attribution shows how much of a portfolio’s overall return is directly attributable to stock selection and asset allocation decisions within the portfolio, highlighting which sectors contributed or detracted to the total return. Attribution includes the reinvestment of income. Attribution is presented pure gross of fees and does not include the deduction of all fees and expenses that a client or investor has paid or would have paid. Please refer to the pure gross and net composite returns included within to understand the overall impact of fees.

From a sector perspective, the portfolio’s underperformance relative to the MSCI EAFE Index can be attributed to security selection while allocation effects contributed. Security selection in Industrials, Energy and Financials detracted most from the portfolio’s relative performance. Conversely, security selection in and an underweight in Information Technology, as well as security selection in Health Care, contributed.

Regionally, allocation effects were responsible for the portfolio’s underperformance while security selection contributed. Security selection in Developed Asia and exposure to Canada detracted most from relative performance, while security selection and an underweight in Developed Europe & Middle East contributed.

Contributors and Detractors for 3Q 2026

Relative ContributorsRelative Detractors
DBS GroupBrookfield
ING GroepCameco
AccentureRentokil Initial
SonyFast Retailing
DSM-FirmenichFANUC

Relative contributors and detractors are based on attribution total effect and exclude benchmark securities not held in the portfolio.

Cameco, one of the world’s largest uranium producers, was a primary detractor during the quarter. The company’s stock sold off amid concerns that disruptions at its Canadian uranium operations (including Cigar Lake, McArthur River and Key Lake) would temporarily dampen near-term production. Despite these challenges, the company maintained its annual production outlook, while average realized prices continued to improve and long-term uranium prices reached decade highs. Cameco’s extensive use of long-term contracts, combined with the production flexibility of its tier-one assets, helps insulate the business from short-term commodity price fluctuations and operational volatility. We believe the company remains well-positioned to benefit from growing global demand for nuclear energy through its high-quality uranium assets, fuel services capabilities and ownership interest in Westinghouse.

Rentokil Initial, the U.K.-based pest control and hygiene services company, was a detractor during the quarter. Shares declined following the company’s interim results as investors focused on weaker growth in portions of its North American pest control business and management’s decision to retire its previous 2027 North American margin target. Importantly, North American organic growth improved from the prior year, while customer retention and profitability also increased. Under newly appointed CEO Mike Duffy, the company has strengthened its North American leadership team and is undertaking a broader operational restructuring, with plans to reinvest cost savings into initiatives intended to accelerate organic growth rather than maximize near-term margins. While we continue to assess the new management team’s strategy and execution, we believe Rentokil’s scale, route density and recurring service model provide the company with meaningful competitive advantages.

DBS Group, a leading Asian financial services company headquartered in Singapore, was a top contributor during the quarter. Shares rose following another strong earnings report, with record earnings supported by continued growth in wealth management and other fee-based businesses, as well as resilient net interest income despite lower local interest rates. The company continues to benefit from growing wealth creation across Asia, while its strong capital position has supported increased shareholder distributions and disciplined capital allocation. We believe DBS’s strong market position, diversified sources of earnings and disciplined capital allocation support attractive long-term returns.

Accenture, a leading technology consulting and managed services company, was a primary contributor during the quarter after being the strategy’s largest detractor during the first half of the year. Shares rallied as investor sentiment improved following significant concerns about the potential impact of artificial intelligence on traditional consulting and technology services. While market perceptions of AI’s impact on the industry have shifted considerably, our focus has remained on the underlying business and Accenture’s ability to create value for its clients. For decades, the company’s deep industry expertise, longstanding client relationships, and broad technology ecosystem positioned it to help enterprises integrate new technologies and redesign increasingly complex business processes. The latest wave of technological innovation is no different. We believe these capabilities become more valuable, rather than less, as the pace of technological change accelerates and Accenture becomes mission critical to global enterprises seeking to evolve, adapt and grow.

Recent Portfolio Activity

BuysSells
WEGMichelin

During the quarter, we sold our position in Michelin and invested in WEG.

We initially invested in Michelin, one of the world’s largest tire manufacturers, in the first quarter of 2021. In our view, the company benefits from a strong competitive position driven by its global scale, brand strength and continued leadership in cutting-edge tire technology. During our ownership, Michelin made progress on several of the catalysts we had identified, including shifting its product mix toward higher-margin specialty and large-diameter tires, while pursuing initiatives to improve operating efficiency and expand into higher-growth businesses. However, our ongoing research, including work on Michelin’s competitors, led us to reassess some elements of our original investment thesis as competitive dynamics evolved and the opportunity for further profitability improvements became less certain. As a result, we chose to exit our position to fund what we believe is a more compelling opportunity in WEG.

Headquartered in Jaraguá do Sul, Brazil, and founded in 1961, WEG is a global electrical equipment manufacturer that has evolved from a Brazilian electric motor producer into a diversified industrial platform. The company makes equipment that helps generate, transmit, convert, control and use electricity across industrial and infrastructure applications, including motors, drives, automation systems, transformers, generators and alternators. These products serve end markets such as manufacturing, mining, oil and gas, water infrastructure, utilities, renewable energy, and data centers, giving WEG exposure to both traditional industrial demand and longer-term investment in electrification, grid modernization and automation.

WEG’s differentiation lies less in the product categories themselves than in the operating model it has built around them. Motors, transformers and other electrical equipment markets can be cyclical, competitive and capital intensive, but WEG has historically generated attractive profitability through vertical integration, engineering discipline, cost control and a long-term reinvestment culture. Its roots in southern Brazil, a region with a strong engineering and manufacturing tradition, have helped shape this operating culture. In our opinion, this model has allowed the company to expand from a strong Brazilian base into international markets while maintaining attractive returns and a strong balance sheet.

Some of the quality characteristics we have identified for WEG include:

  • A vertically integrated manufacturing model that supports cost efficiency, quality control, product customization and supply-chain reliability;
  • Significant scale and established market positions across core product categories, including global leadership in low-voltage industrial motors and a dominant position in Latin American transformers;
  • A long-term ownership culture, with the founding families retaining a controlling interest and supporting continued reinvestment in the business; and
  • A strong financial profile, including a net cash balance sheet and a long track record of growth, with only one year of negative revenue growth over the past 15 years.

We believe shares of WEG are attractively valued given our estimates of normalized earnings. In our view, the company’s long-term opportunities for international expansion, additional manufacturing capacity and market share gains are not fully reflected in its current valuation, as investor attention remains focused on near-term uncertainty surrounding tariffs, renewable energy demand and Brazil-related macroeconomic volatility.

Catalysts we have identified for WEG, which we believe will cause its stock price to appreciate over our three- to five-year investment horizon, include:

  • Continued expansion beyond Brazil, particularly in motors, transformers, alternators and automation, as WEG builds scale and market share in international markets;
  • Further localization and vertical integration of manufacturing capacity, supporting customer service, supply-chain efficiency and WEG’s ability to replicate its operating model outside of Brazil;
  • Continued integration and improvement of acquired businesses, including Marathon in motors and alternators and Crompton Greaves Power Systems in transformers, as WEG applies its manufacturing discipline and reinvestment model to these platforms; and
  • Expansion of transformer manufacturing capacity, including planned capacity additions through 2028, supported by demand for grid investment, electrification and data center-related electrical infrastructure.

Conclusion

Periods of relative underperformance can test conviction, particularly when market leadership is narrow and rapidly changing. However, we believe the appropriate response is not to chase what has recently worked but to remain focused on the long-term drivers of value creation. This discipline has guided our investment process across multiple market cycles and continues to shape how we position the portfolio today.

Importantly, recent performance has not been accompanied by a deterioration in the businesses we own. In many cases, earnings have continued to grow even as valuation multiples have compressed, creating what we believe is an increasingly attractive disconnect between share prices and normalized earnings power. While periods like this are challenging, they can also create opportunity for long-term investors. We believe the very conditions that have challenged recent relative performance have strengthened the portfolio’s prospective return potential.

Disclosures

The opinions expressed herein are those of Aristotle Capital Management, LLC (Aristotle Capital) and are subject to change without notice. This material is not financial advice or an offer to buy or sell any product. You should not assume that any of the securities transactions, sectors or holdings discussed in this report were or will be profitable, or that recommendations Aristotle Capital makes in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of the securities listed in this report. The portfolio characteristics shown relate to the Aristotle International Equity ADR strategy. Not every client’s account will have these characteristics. Aristotle Capital reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs. There is no assurance that any securities discussed herein will remain in an account’s portfolio at the time you receive this report or that securities sold have not been repurchased. The securities discussed may not represent an account’s entire portfolio and, in the aggregate, may represent only a small percentage of an account’s portfolio holdings. The performance attribution presented is of a representative account from Aristotle Capital’s International Equity ADR strategy. The representative account is a discretionary client account which was chosen to most closely reflect the investment style of the strategy. The criteria used for representative account selection is based on the account’s period of time under management and its similarity of holdings in relation to the strategy. Recommendations made in the last 12 months are available upon request.

Composite returns are presented pure gross and net of the maximum wrap fee and include the reinvestment of all income. Pure gross returns do not reflect the deduction of any trading costs or other fees and are supplemental to the net returns. Net returns are calculated by subtracting the highest applicable wrap/SMA fee, which includes trading costs and custodial fees, from the pure gross composite return. (From inception to 12/31/2015, the highest applicable wrap/SMA fee is 3.00% on an annual basis, or 0.75% quarterly. From 1/1/2016 to 12/31/2023, the highest applicable wrap/SMA fee is 2.00% on an annual basis, or 0.50% quarterly and 0.17% monthly from 1/1/2024 to present.)

All investments carry a certain degree of risk, including the possible loss of principal. Investments are also subject to political, market, currency and regulatory risks or economic developments. International investments involve special risks that may in particular cause a loss in principal, including currency fluctuation, lower liquidity, different accounting methods and economic and political systems, and higher transaction costs. These risks typically are greater in emerging markets. While Large-capitalization companies may have more stable prices than smaller, less established companies, they are still subject to equity securities risk. In addition, large-capitalization equity security prices may not rise as much as prices of equity securities of small-capitalization companies. Securities of small- and medium-sized companies tend to have a shorter history of operations and be more volatile and less liquid. Value stocks can perform differently from the market as a whole and other types of stocks. The material is provided for informational and/or educational purposes only and is not intended to be and should not be construed as investment, legal or tax advice and/or a legal opinion. Investors should consult their financial and tax adviser before making investments. The opinions referenced are as of the date of publication, may be modified due to changes in the market or economic conditions, and may not necessarily come to pass. Information and data presented has been developed internally and/or obtained from sources believed to be reliable. Aristotle Capital does not guarantee the accuracy, adequacy or completeness of such information.

Aristotle Capital Management, LLC is an independent registered investment adviser under the Advisers Act of 1940, as amended. Registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training. More information about Aristotle Capital, including our investment strategies, fees and objectives, can be found in our Form ADV Part 2, which is available upon request. ACM-2610-81

Performance Disclosures

Past performance is not indicative of future results. The information provided should not be considered financial advice or a recommendation to purchase or sell any particular security or product. Performance results for periods greater than one year have been annualized.

The Aristotle International Equity ADR WM Composite has an inception date of 7/1/2012. As of 1/1/2024, the Composite was renamed from the International Equity ADR Wrap Composite.

Composite returns are presented pure gross and net of the maximum wrap fee and include the reinvestment of all income. Pure gross returns do not reflect the deduction of any trading costs or other fees and are supplemental to the net returns. Net returns are calculated by subtracting the highest applicable wrap/SMA fee, which includes trading costs and custodial fees, from the pure gross composite return. (From inception to 12/31/2015, the highest applicable wrap/SMA fee is 3.00% on an annual basis, or 0.75% quarterly. From 1/1/2016 to 12/31/2023, the highest applicable wrap/SMA fee is 2.00% on an annual basis, or 0.50% quarterly and 0.17% monthly from 1/1/2024 to present.)

Index Disclosures

The MSCI EAFE Index (Europe, Australasia, Far East) is an equity index which captures large and mid cap representation across Developed Markets (DM) countries around the world, excluding the US and Canada. The index covers approximately 85% of the free float-adjusted market capitalization in each country The MSCI ACWI Index captures large and mid cap representation across Developed Markets (DM) and Emerging Markets (EM) countries. The index covers approximately 85% of the global investable equity opportunity set. The MSCI ACWI ex USA Index captures large and mid cap representation across Developed Markets (DM) countries (excluding the US) and Emerging Markets (EM) countries. The index covers approximately 85% of the global equity opportunity set outside the United States. The MSCI Emerging Markets Index captures large and mid cap representation across Emerging Markets (EM) countries. The index covers approximately 85% of the free float-adjusted market capitalization in each country. The S&P 500 Index is the Standard & Poor’s Composite Index and is a widely recognized, unmanaged index of common stock prices. It is market cap weighted and includes 500 leading companies, capturing approximately 80% coverage of available market capitalization. The Brent Crude Oil Index is a major trading classification of sweet light crude oil that serves as a major benchmark price for purchases of oil worldwide. The Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond Index is a flagship measure of global investment grade debt from 27 local currency markets. This multi-currency benchmark includes treasury, government-related, corporate and securitized fixed-rate bonds from both developed and emerging markets issuers. The MSCI Europe Index captures large and mid cap representation across Developed Markets (DM) countries in Europe. The Index covers approximately 85% of the free float-adjusted market capitalization across the European Developed Markets equity universe. These indexes have been selected as the benchmarks and are used for comparison purposes only. The volatility (beta) of the Composite may be greater or less than the respective benchmarks. It is not possible to invest directly in these indexes.

For more on International Equity, access the latest resources.

Markets Review

Sources: CAPS CompositeHubTM, Bloomberg
Past performance is not indicative of future results. Aristotle Value Equity WM Composite returns are presented pure gross and net of the maximum wrap fee and include the reinvestment of all income. Pure gross returns do not reflect the deduction of any trading costs or other fees and are supplemental to the net returns. Net returns are calculated by subtracting the highest applicable wrap/SMA fee, which includes trading costs and custodial fees, from the pure gross composite return. (From inception to 12/31/2015, the highest applicable wrap/SMA fee is 3.00% on an annual basis, or 0.75% quarterly. From 1/1/2016 to 12/31/2023, the highest applicable wrap/SMA fee is 2.00% on an annual basis, or 0.50% quarterly and 0.17% monthly from 1/1/2024 to present.) Please see important disclosures at the end of this document.

Breakdowns in geopolitical negotiations, changes in central bank policy and renewed trade conflicts; we’ve seen it all before. Concentrated capital, driven by speculative enthusiasm and drawing attention away from fundamentally stable, predictable businesses; we’ve spoken about this at length.

More recently, significant changes in the composition of our primary benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value, have reshaped the Index. Seven of the Index’s ten largest contributors to returns during the first half of the year were removed at the end of June: Micron, Caterpillar, Applied Materials, AMD, Sandisk, Western Digital and Marvell Technology. At the same time, Apple and Microsoft entered the Index, while Amazon’s weight increased significantly. Together, Amazon, Apple and Microsoft represented approximately 15% of the benchmark following the reconstitution, compared with approximately 10% for the Index’s three largest constituents at the end of 2025.

The impact extends beyond individual constituents. The sector composition of the Russell 1000 Value has also changed meaningfully since late last year, with Information Technology increasing from approximately 12% of the Index to 21%, while Communication Services declined from approximately 8% to 3%. As a result, the exposures represented by the Index today are materially different from those represented by the same benchmark less than a year ago (and increasingly reminiscent of growth indexes of the past).

These changes have occurred during a period of unusually wide dispersion between high- and low-beta stocks. Over the past six months ending September 30, the highest-beta quintile of the Russell 1000 Value gained approximately 53%, while the lowest-beta quintile declined approximately 2%, a spread of about 55 percentage points. Beta, not simply value exposure, was therefore a major driver of relative returns during this period. For long-term investors, a value rally driven by higher beta can mask greater market risk, as higher returns may reflect greater market sensitivity rather than improving fundamentals.

Concentrated Leadership Has Reached Value Benchmarks

1For purposes of this analysis, “narrower participation” refers to periods in which a relatively sm1all number of securities account for a disproportionate share of an index’s total return.

While these dynamics help explain recent relative performance, we believe the more important forward-looking questions for long-term investors are, “What unintended risks have these dislocations created?” and “Where do the most attractive opportunities exist today?” Many of Value Equity’s recent detractors have continued to grow earnings even as their valuation multiples have compressed, resulting in an increasingly attractive disconnect between fundamentals and share prices.

Performance and Attribution Summary

For the third quarter of 2026, Aristotle Capital’s Value Equity WM Composite posted a total return of 0.41% pure gross of fees (-0.09% net of fees), underperforming the 2.61% return of the Russell 1000 Value Index and the 2.30% return of the S&P 500 Index. Please refer to the table for detailed performance.

Performance (%) 3Q26YTD1 Years3 Years5 Years10 Years
Value Equity WM Composite (pure gross)0.412.754.2412.256.5111.30
Value Equity WM Composite (net)-0.091.242.2010.074.419.09
Russell 1000 Value Index2.6119.2723.8120.0711.9211.43
S&P 500 Index2.3012.7515.7422.8913.7915.33
Past performance is not indicative of future results. Aristotle Value Equity WM Composite returns are presented pure gross and net of the maximum wrap fee and include the reinvestment of all income. Pure gross returns do not reflect the deduction of any trading costs or other fees and are supplemental to the net returns. Net returns are calculated by subtracting the highest applicable wrap/SMA fee, which includes trading costs and custodial fees, from the pure gross composite return. (From inception to 12/31/2015, the highest applicable wrap/SMA fee is 3.00% on an annual basis, or 0.75% quarterly. From 1/1/2016 to 12/31/2023, the highest applicable wrap/SMA fee is 2.00% on an annual basis, or 0.50% quarterly and 0.17% monthly from 1/1/2024 to present.) Please see important disclosures at the end of this document.

Source: FactSet
Past performance is not indicative of future results. Sector attribution shows how much of a portfolio’s overall return is directly attributable to stock selection and asset allocation decisions within the portfolio, highlighting which sectors contributed or detracted to the total return. Attribution includes the reinvestment of income. Attribution is presented pure gross of fees and does not include the deduction of all fees and expenses that a client or investor has paid or would have paid. Please refer to the pure gross and net composite returns included within to understand the overall impact of fees.

The portfolio’s underperformance relative to the Russell 1000 Value Index in the third quarter can be attributed to both security selection and allocation effects. Security selection in Information Technology, Materials and Communication Services detracted the most from relative performance. Conversely, security selection in Financials, an underweight in Consumer Discretionary and an overweight in Communication Services contributed. (Relative weights are the result of bottom-up security selection.)

Contributors and Detractors for 3Q 2026

Relative ContributorsRelative Detractors
Mitsubishi UFJ FinancialMartin Marietta Materials
AmgenMicrochip Technology
SonyCorteva
ChevronCarrier Global
TotalEnergiesMicrosoft

Relative contributors and detractors are based on attribution total effect and exclude benchmark securities not held in the portfolio.

Martin Marietta, a leading supplier of construction aggregates and building materials, was the largest detractor during the quarter. Despite continued strength in the company’s underlying results, shares declined as investors remained cautious about the outlook for construction activity and the timing of a recovery in interest-rate-sensitive end markets. Martin Marietta reported record second quarter revenues, continued pricing gains and strong operating performance during the period. The company also completed the $13.5 billion acquisition of Lhoist North America, significantly expanding its higher-margin Specialties business and adding more than two billion tons of high-quality limestone reserves. The transaction also broadens Martin Marietta’s exposure to infrastructure and industrial end markets, including domestic manufacturing, data centers and energy development. We believe the company’s advantaged reserve positions, disciplined pricing and the continued shift toward higher-value upstream materials should support attractive long-term earnings and cash flow generation.

Microchip Technology, the microcontroller (MCU) and analog semiconductor producer, was a significant detractor during the period. The company’s stock sold off despite continued evidence of improvement in its underlying business. Customer inventories continued to normalize and bookings remained strong, supporting a recovery in demand following the prolonged industry downturn. Higher factory utilization and disciplined expense management also contributed to improved profitability and cash flow generation. While management noted potential capacity constraints at certain external manufacturing partners, Microchip’s internal capacity remains sufficient to support its growth expectations. We believe the company’s broad product portfolio, longstanding customer relationships and commitment to extended product lifecycles position it well to benefit from a continued recovery in its core end markets, while growing opportunities in data centers and aerospace & defense provide additional avenues for long-term growth.

Amgen, the biopharmaceutical company, was one of the largest contributors during the quarter. The company has continued to benefit from growth across several newer and expanding medicines, including Repatha (cholesterol), Evenity (osteoporosis), Tezspire (asthma) and Uplizna (rare autoimmune diseases), as well as emphasizing clinical developments across its pipeline. While Amgen faces increasing biosimilar competition for several of its mature biologic therapies, the company is also benefiting from opportunities in the growing biosimilars market. Leveraging its biologics expertise and global manufacturing scale, the company has generated more than $15 billion in biosimilar sales since 2018, with additional candidates in development. We believe the breadth of Amgen’s portfolio and improving research productivity, combined with its ability to capitalize on its global commercial and manufacturing infrastructure, position the company to benefit as its pipeline develops.

Chevron, one of the world’s largest integrated energy companies, was a leading contributor during the quarter. While higher oil prices provided a favorable backdrop, we remain more focused on the continued improvement in the underlying economics of the business. The completion of the Tengiz expansion moved a significant multi-year project from investment into production. Meanwhile, the 2025 acquisition of Hess added Guyana’s Stabroek block to Chevron’s asset portfolio, where six announced developments have breakeven costs below $35 per barrel. In addition, its Permian Basin footprint is shifting from an emphasis on production growth toward cash generation as spending moderates and operating efficiencies improve. The company also reached its $3 billion structural cost-reduction target six months ahead of schedule. Looking forward, we believe low-cost production growth from Guyana, increasing capital efficiency across the portfolio and continued operating discipline should support higher returns and FREE cash flow as the company benefits from several years of significant investment.

Recent Portfolio Activity

BuysSells
Carrier GlobalOshkosh

During the quarter, we sold our position in Oshkosh and purchased Carrier Global.

We most recently invested in Oshkosh, a manufacturer of specialty vehicles and access equipment, in early 2022. During our holding period, we believe the company executed well on many of the catalysts we had identified, including improved profitability through pricing discipline, manufacturing efficiencies, a more favorable business mix, continued product innovation and the ramp-up of production of the U.S. Postal Service’s Next Generation Delivery Vehicle program. Given the progress, we chose to sell our position and redeploy the proceeds into what we believe is a more attractive opportunity in Carrier Global.

Carrier Global Corporation

Headquartered in Florida, Carrier Global is a leading global provider of heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) solutions. The company traces its roots to Willis Carrier’s invention of modern air conditioning in 1902 and today serves residential, commercial and transportation markets around the world. Carrier holds leading positions across several HVAC categories and owns a portfolio of well-recognized brands, including Carrier, Viessmann and Transicold.

Carrier became an independent public company following its 2020 spinoff from United Technologies. Since then, management has substantially reshaped the business, divesting the company’s Fire & Security and Commercial Refrigeration operations and acquiring Viessmann Climate Solutions and Carrier’s former joint venture with Toshiba (Carrier Japan). These transactions have transformed Carrier into a more focused HVAC company with technologies spanning traditional ducted systems, ductless and mini-split systems, heat pumps, inverter-based air conditioning, and large commercial applications.

We believe the world remains structurally “under air-conditioned.” Rising global temperatures, increasing living standards, and electrification of buildings to incorporate heating and more stringent energy-efficiency requirements should support long-term demand for HVAC equipment. Importantly, we find that Carrier’s breadth of technologies and geographic reach position the company to benefit from growing HVAC demand diversified across markets and applications rather than relying on any single technology or end market.

Some of the quality characteristics we have identified for Carrier include:

  • Leading market positions across several HVAC categories, including U.S. residential and light commercial, European residential and commercial, and transport refrigeration;
  • Strong brands and distribution networks, which create meaningful barriers to entry, particularly in developed residential HVAC markets;
  • An expanding parts and service business, which provides more recurring revenue and attractive margins while deepening Carrier’s relationships with its installed customer base; and
  • A well-regarded and stable management team that has successfully repositioned Carrier into a more focused HVAC company following its separation from United Technologies.

Attractive Valuation

We believe shares of Carrier are attractively valued relative to our estimates of the company’s normalized earnings and FREE cash flow generation. In our view, the current valuation does not fully reflect the potential for residential HVAC volumes in North America and Europe to recover from depressed levels, continued market share gains in commercial HVAC, or further expansion of the company’s higher-margin aftermarket parts and service business. Carrier also generates meaningful FREE cash flow, supporting a well-covered and growing dividend while providing additional capital for share repurchases and other capital allocation opportunities.

Compelling Catalysts   

Catalysts we have identified for Carrier, which we believe will cause its stock price to appreciate over our three- to five-year investment horizon, include:

  • Increasing global air-conditioning penetration, supported by rising living standards, electrification and regulatory requirements that encourage adoption of more efficient, higher-value HVAC systems;
  • Continued expansion of Carrier’s aftermarket parts and service business, where improved capture of its installed base should contribute to more recurring revenue, higher margins and less cyclical earnings over time;
  • Market share gains in large commercial, or “applied,” HVAC, where Carrier has reinvigorated its product offering since becoming independent, with additional growth opportunities from data centers and other industrial applications requiring increasingly sophisticated cooling technologies;
  • Normalization of residential HVAC demand in North America and Europe, including European heat-pump demand, where industry volumes remain below historical levels;
  • Benefits from the Viessmann acquisition, including its strong European brand, installer network and heat-pump technology that can potentially be leveraged across Carrier’s broader geographic footprint; and
  • Continued capital deployment through a growing dividend and share repurchases, supported by meaningful FREE cash flow generation.

Conclusion

Periods of relative underperformance can test conviction, particularly when market leadership is narrow and rapidly changing. However, we believe the appropriate response is not to chase what has recently worked but to remain focused on the long-term drivers of value creation. This discipline has guided our investment process across multiple market cycles and continues to shape how we position the portfolio today.

Importantly, recent performance has not been accompanied by a deterioration in the businesses we own. In many cases, earnings have continued to grow even as valuation multiples have compressed, creating what we believe is an increasingly attractive disconnect between share prices and normalized earnings power. While periods like this are challenging, they can also create opportunity for long-term investors. We believe the very conditions that have challenged recent relative performance have strengthened the portfolio’s prospective return potential.

Disclosures

The opinions expressed herein are those of Aristotle Capital Management, LLC (Aristotle Capital) and are subject to change without notice. Past performance is not a guarantee or indicator of future results. This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. You should not assume that any of the securities transactions, sectors or holdings discussed in this report were or will be profitable, or that recommendations Aristotle Capital makes in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of the securities listed in this report. The portfolio characteristics shown relate to the Aristotle Value Equity strategy. Not every client’s account will have these characteristics. Aristotle Capital reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs. There is no assurance that any securities discussed herein will remain in an account’s portfolio at the time you receive this report or that securities sold have not been repurchased. The securities discussed may not represent an account’s entire portfolio and, in the aggregate, may represent only a small percentage of an account’s portfolio holdings. The performance attribution presented is of a representative account from Aristotle Capital’s Value Equity Strategy. The representative account is a discretionary client account which was chosen to most closely reflect the investment style of the strategy. The criteria used for representative account selection is based on the account’s period of time under management and its similarity of holdings in relation to the strategy. Recommendations made in the last 12 months are available upon request.

Composite returns are presented pure gross and net of the maximum wrap fee and include the reinvestment of all income. Pure gross returns do not reflect the deduction of any trading costs or other fees and are supplemental to the net returns. Net returns are calculated by subtracting the highest applicable wrap/SMA fee, which includes trading costs and custodial fees, from the pure gross composite return. (From inception to 12/31/2015, the highest applicable wrap/SMA fee is 3.00% on an annual basis, or 0.75% quarterly. From 1/1/2016 to 12/31/2023, the highest applicable wrap/SMA fee is 2.00% on an annual basis, or 0.50% quarterly and 0.17% monthly from 1/1/2024 to present.)

All investments carry a certain degree of risk, including the possible loss of principal. Investments are also subject to political, market, currency and regulatory risks or economic developments. International investments involve special risks that may in particular cause a loss in principal, including currency fluctuation, lower liquidity, different accounting methods and economic and political systems, and higher transaction costs. These risks typically are greater in emerging markets. While Large-capitalization companies may have more stable prices than smaller, less established companies, they are still subject to equity securities risk. In addition, large-capitalization equity security prices may not rise as much as prices of equity securities of small-capitalization companies. Securities of small- and medium-sized companies tend to have a shorter history of operations and be more volatile and less liquid. Value stocks can perform differently from the market as a whole and other types of stocks. The material is provided for informational and/or educational purposes only and is not intended to be and should not be construed as investment, legal or tax advice and/or a legal opinion. Investors should consult their financial and tax adviser before making investments. The opinions referenced are as of the date of publication, may be modified due to changes in the market or economic conditions, and may not necessarily come to pass. Information and data presented has been developed internally and/or obtained from sources believed to be reliable. Aristotle Capital does not guarantee the accuracy, adequacy or completeness of such information.

Aristotle Capital Management, LLC is an independent registered investment adviser under the Advisers Act of 1940, as amended. Registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training. More information about Aristotle Capital, including our investment strategies, fees and objectives, can be found in our ADV Part 2, which is available upon request. ACM-2610-78

Performance Disclosures


Sources: CAPS CompositeHubTM, Russell Investments, Standard & Poor’s

Past performance is not indicative of future results. The information provided should not be considered financial advice or a recommendation to purchase or sell any particular security or product. Performance results for periods greater than one year have been annualized.

The Aristotle Value Equity WM Composite has an inception date of 10/1/1979. As of 1/1/2024, the Composite was renamed from the Value Equity Wrap Composite and the inception date was updated to 1/1/2012. This update was implemented to align the start date of the composite track record with the start date of the current decision maker. Performance achieved by the firm prior to that date is available upon request.

Composite returns are presented pure gross and net of the maximum wrap fee and include the reinvestment of all income. Pure gross returns do not reflect the deduction of any trading costs or other fees and are supplemental to the net returns. Net returns are calculated by subtracting the highest applicable wrap/SMA fee, which includes trading costs and custodial fees, from the pure gross composite return. (From inception to 12/31/2015, the highest applicable wrap/SMA fee is 3.00% on an annual basis, or 0.75% quarterly. From 1/1/2016 to 12/31/2023, the highest applicable wrap/SMA fee is 2.00% on an annual basis, or 0.50% quarterly and 0.17% monthly from 1/1/2024 to present.)

Index Disclosures

The Russell 1000® Value Index measures the performance of the large cap value segment of the U.S. equity universe. It includes those Russell 1000 Index companies with lower price-to-book ratios and lower expected growth values. The S&P 500® Index is the Standard & Poor’s Composite Index of 500 stocks and is a widely recognized, unmanaged index of common stock prices.  It is market cap weighted and includes 500 leading companies, capturing approximately 80% coverage of available market capitalization. The S&P 500 Equal Weight Index is designed to be the size-neutral version of the S&P 500. It includes the same constituents as the cap-weighted S&P 500, but each company in the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index is allocated the same weight at each quarterly rebalance. The Russell 1000® Growth Index measures the performance of the large cap growth segment of the U.S. equity universe. It includes those Russell 1000 companies with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values. The Russell 2000® Index measures the performance of the small cap segment of the U.S. equity universe. The Russell 2000 Index is a subset of the Russell 3000® Index representing approximately 10% of the total market capitalization of that index. It includes approximately 2,000 of the smallest securities based on a combination of their market cap and current index membership. The Dow Jones Industrial Average® is a price-weighted measure of 30 U.S. blue-chip companies. The Index covers all industries except transportation and utilities. The NASDAQ Composite Index measures all NASDAQ domestic and international based common type stocks listed on The NASDAQ Stock Market. The NASDAQ Composite includes over 3,000 companies, more than most other stock market indexes. The Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index is an unmanaged index of domestic investment grade bonds, including corporate, government and mortgage-backed securities. The WTI Crude Oil Index is a major trading classification of sweet light crude oil that serves as a major benchmark price for oil consumed in the United States. The 3-Month U.S. Treasury Bill is a short-term debt obligation backed by the U.S. Treasury Department with a maturity of three months. The volatility (beta) of the Composite may be greater or less than its respective benchmarks. It is not possible to invest directly in these indices.