FOR FINANCIAL ADVISORS ONLY.  NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION.

(All MSCI index returns are shown net and in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.)

Markets Review

Global Markets (total return) performed as follows:

Sources: SS&C Advent, Bloomberg
Past performance is not indicative of future results. Aristotle International Equity ADR Composite returns are presented gross and net of investment advisory fees and include the reinvestment of all income. Aristotle Capital Composite returns are preliminary pending final account reconciliation. Please see important disclosures at the end of this document.

After declining in the third quarter of 2021, global equity markets rebounded during the fourth quarter.  Overall, the MSCI ACWI Index climbed 6.68% during the period, which brings its full-year return to 18.54%.  Concurrently, the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond Index pulled back 0.67%, which gives the Index a calendar-year return of -4.71%.  In terms of style, value stocks underperformed their growth counterparts during the quarter, with the MSCI ACWI Value Index trailing the MSCI ACWI Growth Index by 0.67%. However, for the full year, the MSCI ACWI Value outperformed the MSCI ACWI Growth by 2.52%.

The MSCI EAFE Index rose 2.69% during the fourth quarter, while the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index gained 1.82%.  Regionally, the U.K. and Europe & Middle East were the strongest performers, while Asia was the weakest.  On a sector basis, nine out of the eleven sectors within the MSCI EAFE Index posted positive returns, led by Utilities, Materials and Consumer Staples.  Conversely, Communication Services, Energy and Real Estate were the worst-performing sectors.

Similar to previous quarters, investors focused on the progress of the global recovery.  Although corporate revenues and earnings continued to rebound during the period, the IMF announced a slight downward revision to its 2021 global real GDP growth projections due to continued supply disruptions and uncertain pandemic dynamics.  These conditions have caused shortages of key inputs, lowered manufacturing activity and fueled inflation across the globe.

In addition to a global shipping crisis and semiconductor shortages, the energy sector also captured numerous headlines as robust demand outpaced supply, causing prices to surge.  After a historic drop in energy consumption in 2020, the global economic recovery and a long and cold winter in the Northern Hemisphere have driven a strong rebound in demand, while the ongoing shift to renewables has impacted production and future investments in fossil fuels.  Although OPEC and countries such as Russia have pledged to boost supply, the energy crunch has highlighted issues in long-term production.  Furthermore, rising energy prices have contributed to an inflation loop as the prices of energy-intensive materials like nickel, steel and silicon have all risen.

Increased inflation, combined with an uncertain recovery, has created policy challenges for central banks.  On one hand, the rhetoric on inflation being “transitory” softened as many central banks took a hawkish approach.  During the quarter, the European Central Bank announced a gradual phaseout of its bond purchase program, while countries like the U.K., Russia and Mexico raised interest rates.  On the other hand, policy in Southeast Asia was largely unchanged, and China announced an easing of its monetary policy that will likely include further cuts to lending rates.

On the COVID front, the Omicron variant became the dominant strain in areas such as the U.K. and the U.S.  The number of new daily cases reached as high as ~1,750,000, the highest reported figure during the pandemic, with Europe and the Americas reporting the greatest number of cases.

Annual Markets Review

In a year filled with uncertainty, global economies proved largely resilient.  Even in the face of supply-chain disruptions and multiple variants of the COVID-19 virus, global recovery continued throughout the period.  Themes from 2020, such as central bank policy decisions and vaccine distribution, persisted.

Although we are happy to report another strong year, the constant twists, turns and pivots of this past year are a reminder of the fragility of the short term. Factors such as the possibility of new variants, the timing of a full recovery, fiscal and monetary policy decisions, and market sentiment are topics better left for reporters. We believe investment managers (and their clients) are best positioned to create lasting value by minimizing distractions and focusing on the long term.

Performance and Attribution Summary

For the fourth quarter of 2021, Aristotle Capital’s International Equity ADR Composite posted a total U.S. dollar return of 4.67% gross of fees (4.56% net of fees), outperforming the MSCI EAFE Index, which returned 2.69%, and the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index, which returned 1.82%.  Please refer to the table below for detailed performance.

Performance (%) 4Q211
Year
3
Years
5
Years
Since
Inception*
Int’l Equity ADR Composite (gross)4.6716.1716.2912.267.99
Int’l Equity ADR Composite (net)4.5615.5815.8111.817.48
MSCI EAFE Index (net)2.6911.2613.539.546.44
MSCI ACWI ex USA Index (net)1.827.8213.179.606.03
*The inception date for the International Equity ADR Composite is June 1, 2013. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Returns are presented gross and net of investment advisory fees and include the reinvestment of all income. Aristotle Capital Composite returns are preliminary pending final account reconciliation. Please see important disclosures at the end of this document.

From a sector perspective, the portfolio’s outperformance relative to the MSCI EAFE Index can be attributed to security selection. Security selection in Information Technology, Financials and Industrials contributed the most to the portfolio’s relative performance.  Conversely, security selection in Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services and a lack of exposure to Utilities detracted from relative return. 

Source: FactSet

Past performance is not indicative of future results. Attribution results are based on sector returns, which are gross of investment advisory fees and include the reinvestment of all income. Please see important disclosures at the end of this document..

Regionally, both security selection and allocation effects were responsible for the portfolio’s outperformance.  Security selection in Europe & Middle East and an overweight in Canada contributed the most to relative performance, while an underweight in Europe & Middle East and security selection in the United Kingdom detracted.

Contributors and Detractors for 4Q 2021

Relative ContributorsRelative Detractors
AccenturePan Pacific International
Brookfield Asset ManagementKDDI
SonyOtsuka Holdings
Dassault SystèmesAIA Group
ExperianCarnival

Accenture, the global IT services and consulting firm, was the top contributor during the quarter. Shares continued their impressive performance as the company reported strong results, benefiting from accelerating digital transformations across all markets and industries—a catalyst we previously identified.  Revenue for every client industry group that Accenture services increased by double digits from the prior year.  Furthermore, the company added 15 Diamond Clients (its most important tier of client) in the first quarter of FY 2022 alone, more than it onboarded for the entirety of FY 2021.  We believe Accenture remains uniquely equipped to capitalize on the continuing trend of compressed digital transformations, where enterprises demand comprehensive digital and cloud transformations in a shorter time period.  What is striking is that Accenture believes only one-third of the industry has implemented compressed transformation, leaving ample runway for further adoption.  In addition, given Accenture’s strong value proposition of providing IT solutions to its long-standing client base of many of the world’s largest companies, we believe it is well positioned to pass on inflationary cost pressures through future price increases, as management intends.

Canada-based alternative asset manager Brookfield Asset Management was also a top contributor during the quarter, as it has continued its fundraising momentum, having raised more than $34 billion in the second half of 2021, and built out significant scale across its private markets offerings. The inflows during the quarter were largely driven by the firm’s flagship funds, including its real estate and infrastructure funds.  Through these funds, Brookfield both develops and operates properties across the globe, as well as infrastructure assets that span utilities, transportation and data centers.  Also positive for Brookfield, carried interest revenue, additional compensation it receives for high-performing investment funds, rose 9% quarter-over-quarter, a testament to its ongoing stronger realizations of incentive fees.  Moreover, the firm has seen sustained outsized demand from institutional investors for its physical asset funds, a catalyst we’ve identified, with management in December expressing its flexibility to potentially increase the future size of these funds.

Pan Pacific International, the Japanese discount and general merchandise retailer, was the quarter’s largest detractor. Operating profits declined more than 30% year-over-year.  This was in part due to lower foot traffic during a rainy season in Japan, coupled with a recently more difficult pandemic environment.  Spending on technology investments, renovations and new store openings also compressed margins.  However, we view these headwinds as temporary, and the investments, renovations and new openings as appropriate capital allocation, and continue to focus on the long-term strength of the business.  Pan Pacific’s Don Quijote stores create a sense of treasure hunt that elicits high entertainment value—a unique business model that we believe will allow for organic market share gains in Japan, as well expansion overseas.  With the company’s demonstrated ability to turn around competitors’ stores, in our opinion, it also stands to benefit from the ongoing conversion of its acquired UNY locations.

AIA Group, a pan-Asian life insurance company headquartered in Hong Kong, was one of the largest detractors for the quarter. Shares declined despite continued improvements in fundamentals and progress further establishing AIA Group’s direct presence in mainland China, a catalyst we previously identified.  AIA Group has benefited from an increasingly technology-enabled and productive agency salesforce; we believe this has helped the company deftly navigate pandemic-related travel restrictions.  In fact, the company’s VONB* advanced 15% in the first nine months of 2021, with all areas outside of Hong Kong exceeding pre-pandemic levels.  In our opinion, the advances in mainland China are more notable than the interim results.  With the recent approval from the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission to begin operations in the Hubei province, AIA Group now has operations in eight provinces, providing what we consider to be a unique platform to further penetrate this increasingly large market.

Recent Portfolio Activity

BuysSells
NoneNone

Consistent with our long-term horizon and low turnover, there were no new purchases or sales completed during the quarter.

Conclusion

As we turn the page on another year, we are reminded of the fleeting nature of headline news.  Our focus is not on factors that will change in the coming months, but rather on the fundamentals of businesses that may persist for years.

Rather than attempting the impossible task of predicting the unpredictable, we remain steadfast in abiding by our investment philosophy and process that have been in place for nearly 25 years.  By utilizing a long-term approach and identifying what we perceive to be high-quality businesses, trading at discounts to our estimates of their intrinsic value, that possess catalysts within management’s control, we believe we can withstand short-term swings and add lasting value for our clients.

Disclosures

*Value of New Business (VONB) is an insurance term for the present value of new business written during a period

The opinions expressed herein are those of Aristotle Capital Management, LLC (Aristotle Capital) and are subject to change without notice. Past performance is not a guarantee or indicator of future results. This material is not financial advice or an offer to buy or sell any product. You should not assume that any of the securities transactions, sectors or holdings discussed in this report were or will be profitable, or that recommendations Aristotle Capital makes in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of the securities listed in this report. The portfolio characteristics shown relate to the Aristotle International Equity ADR strategy. Not every client’s account will have these characteristics. Aristotle Capital reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs. There is no assurance that any securities discussed herein will remain in an account’s portfolio at the time you receive this report or that securities sold have not been repurchased. The securities discussed may not represent an account’s entire portfolio and, in the aggregate, may represent only a small percentage of an account’s portfolio holdings. The performance attribution presented is of a representative account from Aristotle Capital’s International Equity ADR Composite. The representative account is a discretionary client account which was chosen to most closely reflect the investment style of the strategy. The criteria used for representative account selection is based on the account’s period of time under management and its similarity of holdings in relation to the strategy. Recommendations made in the last 12 months are available upon request.

Returns are presented gross and net of investment advisory fees and include the reinvestment of all income. Gross returns will be reduced by fees and other expenses that may be incurred in the management of the account. For example, a 0.5% annual fee deducted quarterly (0.125%) from an account with a ten-year annualized growth rate of 5.0% will produce a net result of 4.4%. Actual performance results will vary from this example. Please see important disclosures enclosed within this document.

The MSCI EAFE Index (Europe, Australasia, Far East) is a free float-adjusted market capitalization-weighted index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the United States and Canada. The MSCI EAFE Index consists of the following 21 developed market country indices: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, Singapore, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. The MSCI ACWI captures large and mid cap representation across 23 developed market countries and 25 emerging markets countries. With approximately 3,000 constituents, the Index covers approximately 85% of the global investable equity opportunity set. The MSCI ACWI Growth Index captures large and mid cap securities exhibiting overall growth style characteristics across 23 developed markets countries and 25 emerging markets countries. The MSCI ACWI Value Index captures large and mid cap securities exhibiting overall value style characteristics across 23 developed markets countries and 25 emerging markets countries. The MSCI ACWI ex USA Index captures large and mid cap representation across 22 of 23 developed markets countries (excluding the United States) and 25 emerging markets countries. With over 2,300 constituents, the Index covers approximately 85% of the global equity opportunity set outside the United States. The MSCI Emerging Markets Index is a free float-adjusted market capitalization-weighted index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of emerging markets. The MSCI Emerging Markets Index consists of the following 25 emerging market country indexes: Brazil, Chile, China, Colombia, Czech Republic, Egypt, Greece, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Korea, Kuwait, Malaysia, Mexico, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Qatar, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey and United Arab Emirates. The S&P 500® Index is the Standard & Poor’s Composite Index of 500 stocks and is a widely recognized, unmanaged index of common stock prices. The Brent Crude Oil Index is a major trading classification of sweet light crude oil that serves as a major benchmark price for purchases of oil worldwide. The MSCI Japan Index is designed to measure the performance of the large and mid cap segments of the Japanese market. With over 250 constituents, the Index covers approximately 85% of the free float-adjusted market capitalization in Japan. The Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond Index is a flagship measure of global investment grade debt from 28 local currency markets. This multi-currency benchmark includes treasury, government-related, corporate and securitized fixed-rate bonds from both developed and emerging markets issuers. The MSCI United Kingdom Index is designed to measure the performance of the large and mid cap segments of the U.K. market. With nearly 100 constituents, the Index covers approximately 85% of the free float-adjusted market capitalization in the United Kingdom. The MSCI Europe Index captures large and mid cap representation across 15 developed markets countries in Europe. With over 430 constituents, the Index covers approximately 85% of the free float-adjusted market capitalization across the European developed markets equity universe. These indices have been selected as the benchmarks and are used for comparison purposes only. The volatility (beta) of the Composite may be greater or less than the respective benchmarks. It is not possible to invest directly in these indices.

This presentation is to report on the investment strategies as reported by Aristotle Capital Management, LLC and is for illustrative purposes only. The information contained herein is obtained from multiple sources and believed to be reliable. Information has not been verified by Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, and may differ from documents created by Morgan Stanley Wealth Management. The financial advisor should refer to the Profile. This must be preceded or accompanied by the Morgan Stanley Wealth Management Profile, which you can obtain from the Morgan Stanley Wealth Management Performance Analytics. For additional information on other programs, please speak to Patrick Schussman at Aristotle Capital at (310) 954-8156.

Aristotle Capital Management, LLC is an independent registered investment adviser under the Advisers Act of 1940, as amended. Registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training. More information about Aristotle Capital, including our investment strategies, fees and objectives, can be found in our Form ADV Part 2, which is available upon request. ACM-2201-145-MSFA

Performance Disclosures

 

 

Composite returns for all periods ended December 31, 2021 are preliminary pending final account reconciliation.
The performance information presented is based on the Aristotle International Equity ADR Composite.
Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance results for periods greater than one year have been annualized. Returns are presented gross and net of investment advisory fees and include the reinvestment of all income. Gross returns will be reduced by fees and other expenses that may be incurred in the management of the account. For example, a 0.5% annual fee deducted quarterly (0.125%) from an account with a ten-year annualized growth rate of 5.0% will produce a net result of 4.4%. Actual performance results will vary from this example. Please see important disclosures enclosed within this document,

FOR FINANCIAL ADVISORS ONLY. NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION.

(All MSCI index returns are shown net and in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.)

Markets Review

Global Markets (total return) performed as follows:

Sources: SS&C Advent, Bloomberg
Past performance is not indicative of future results. Aristotle International Equity ADR Composite returns are presented gross and net of investment advisory fees and include the reinvestment of all income. Aristotle Capital Composite returns are preliminary pending final account reconciliation. Please see important disclosures at the end of this document.

After declining in the third quarter of 2021, global equity markets rebounded during the fourth quarter.  Overall, the MSCI ACWI Index climbed 6.68% during the period, which brings its full-year return to 18.54%.  Concurrently, the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond Index pulled back 0.67%, which gives the Index a calendar-year return of -4.71%.  In terms of style, value stocks underperformed their growth counterparts during the quarter, with the MSCI ACWI Value Index trailing the MSCI ACWI Growth Index by 0.67%. However, for the full year, the MSCI ACWI Value outperformed the MSCI ACWI Growth by 2.52%.

The MSCI EAFE Index rose 2.69% during the fourth quarter, while the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index gained 1.82%.  Regionally, the U.K. and Europe & Middle East were the strongest performers, while Asia was the weakest.  On a sector basis, nine out of the eleven sectors within the MSCI EAFE Index posted positive returns, led by Utilities, Materials and Consumer Staples.  Conversely, Communication Services, Energy and Real Estate were the worst-performing sectors.

Similar to previous quarters, investors focused on the progress of the global recovery.  Although corporate revenues and earnings continued to rebound during the period, the IMF announced a slight downward revision to its 2021 global real GDP growth projections due to continued supply disruptions and uncertain pandemic dynamics.  These conditions have caused shortages of key inputs, lowered manufacturing activity and fueled inflation across the globe.

In addition to a global shipping crisis and semiconductor shortages, the energy sector also captured numerous headlines as robust demand outpaced supply, causing prices to surge.  After a historic drop in energy consumption in 2020, the global economic recovery and a long and cold winter in the Northern Hemisphere have driven a strong rebound in demand, while the ongoing shift to renewables has impacted production and future investments in fossil fuels.  Although OPEC and countries such as Russia have pledged to boost supply, the energy crunch has highlighted issues in long-term production.  Furthermore, rising energy prices have contributed to an inflation loop as the prices of energy-intensive materials like nickel, steel and silicon have all risen.

Increased inflation, combined with an uncertain recovery, has created policy challenges for central banks.  On one hand, the rhetoric on inflation being “transitory” softened as many central banks took a hawkish approach.  During the quarter, the European Central Bank announced a gradual phaseout of its bond purchase program, while countries like the U.K., Russia and Mexico raised interest rates.  On the other hand, policy in Southeast Asia was largely unchanged, and China announced an easing of its monetary policy that will likely include further cuts to lending rates.

On the COVID front, the Omicron variant became the dominant strain in areas such as the U.K. and the U.S.  The number of new daily cases reached as high as ~1,750,000, the highest reported figure during the pandemic, with Europe and the Americas reporting the greatest number of cases.

Annual Markets Review

In a year filled with uncertainty, global economies proved largely resilient.  Even in the face of supply-chain disruptions and multiple variants of the COVID-19 virus, global recovery continued throughout the period.  Themes from 2020, such as central bank policy decisions and vaccine distribution, persisted.

Although we are happy to report another strong year, the constant twists, turns and pivots of this past year are a reminder of the fragility of the short term. Factors such as the possibility of new variants, the timing of a full recovery, fiscal and monetary policy decisions, and market sentiment are topics better left for reporters. We believe investment managers (and their clients) are best positioned to create lasting value by minimizing distractions and focusing on the long term.

Performance and Attribution Summary

For the fourth quarter of 2021, Aristotle Capital’s International Equity ADR Composite posted a total U.S. dollar return of 4.67% gross of fees (4.56% net of fees), outperforming the MSCI EAFE Index, which returned 2.69%, and the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index, which returned 1.82%.  Please refer to the table below for detailed performance.

Performance (%) 4Q211
Year
3
Years
5
Years
Since
Inception*
Int’l Equity ADR Composite (gross)4.6716.1716.2912.267.99
Int’l Equity ADR Composite (net)4.5615.5815.8111.817.48
MSCI EAFE Index (net)2.6911.2613.539.546.44
MSCI ACWI ex USA Index (net)1.827.8213.179.606.03
*The inception date for the International Equity ADR Composite is June 1, 2013. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Returns are presented gross and net of investment advisory fees and include the reinvestment of all income. Aristotle Capital Composite returns are preliminary pending final account reconciliation. Please see important disclosures at the end of this document.

From a sector perspective, the portfolio’s outperformance relative to the MSCI EAFE Index can be attributed to security selection. Security selection in Information Technology, Financials and Industrials contributed the most to the portfolio’s relative performance.  Conversely, security selection in Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services and a lack of exposure to Utilities detracted from relative return. 

Source: FactSet

Past performance is not indicative of future results. Attribution results are based on sector returns, which are gross of investment advisory fees and include the reinvestment of all income. Please see important disclosures at the end of this document..

Regionally, both security selection and allocation effects were responsible for the portfolio’s outperformance.  Security selection in Europe & Middle East and an overweight in Canada contributed the most to relative performance, while an underweight in Europe & Middle East and security selection in the United Kingdom detracted.

Contributors and Detractors for 4Q 2021

Relative ContributorsRelative Detractors
AccenturePan Pacific International
Brookfield Asset ManagementKDDI
SonyOtsuka Holdings
Dassault SystèmesAIA Group
ExperianCarnival

Accenture, the global IT services and consulting firm, was the top contributor during the quarter. Shares continued their impressive performance as the company reported strong results, benefiting from accelerating digital transformations across all markets and industries—a catalyst we previously identified.  Revenue for every client industry group that Accenture services increased by double digits from the prior year.  Furthermore, the company added 15 Diamond Clients (its most important tier of client) in the first quarter of FY 2022 alone, more than it onboarded for the entirety of FY 2021.  We believe Accenture remains uniquely equipped to capitalize on the continuing trend of compressed digital transformations, where enterprises demand comprehensive digital and cloud transformations in a shorter time period.  What is striking is that Accenture believes only one-third of the industry has implemented compressed transformation, leaving ample runway for further adoption.  In addition, given Accenture’s strong value proposition of providing IT solutions to its long-standing client base of many of the world’s largest companies, we believe it is well positioned to pass on inflationary cost pressures through future price increases, as management intends.

Canada-based alternative asset manager Brookfield Asset Management was also a top contributor during the quarter, as it has continued its fundraising momentum, having raised more than $34 billion in the second half of 2021, and built out significant scale across its private markets offerings. The inflows during the quarter were largely driven by the firm’s flagship funds, including its real estate and infrastructure funds.  Through these funds, Brookfield both develops and operates properties across the globe, as well as infrastructure assets that span utilities, transportation and data centers.  Also positive for Brookfield, carried interest revenue, additional compensation it receives for high-performing investment funds, rose 9% quarter-over-quarter, a testament to its ongoing stronger realizations of incentive fees.  Moreover, the firm has seen sustained outsized demand from institutional investors for its physical asset funds, a catalyst we’ve identified, with management in December expressing its flexibility to potentially increase the future size of these funds.

Pan Pacific International, the Japanese discount and general merchandise retailer, was the quarter’s largest detractor. Operating profits declined more than 30% year-over-year.  This was in part due to lower foot traffic during a rainy season in Japan, coupled with a recently more difficult pandemic environment.  Spending on technology investments, renovations and new store openings also compressed margins.  However, we view these headwinds as temporary, and the investments, renovations and new openings as appropriate capital allocation, and continue to focus on the long-term strength of the business.  Pan Pacific’s Don Quijote stores create a sense of treasure hunt that elicits high entertainment value—a unique business model that we believe will allow for organic market share gains in Japan, as well expansion overseas.  With the company’s demonstrated ability to turn around competitors’ stores, in our opinion, it also stands to benefit from the ongoing conversion of its acquired UNY locations.

AIA Group, a pan-Asian life insurance company headquartered in Hong Kong, was one of the largest detractors for the quarter. Shares declined despite continued improvements in fundamentals and progress further establishing AIA Group’s direct presence in mainland China, a catalyst we previously identified.  AIA Group has benefited from an increasingly technology-enabled and productive agency salesforce; we believe this has helped the company deftly navigate pandemic-related travel restrictions.  In fact, the company’s VONB* advanced 15% in the first nine months of 2021, with all areas outside of Hong Kong exceeding pre-pandemic levels.  In our opinion, the advances in mainland China are more notable than the interim results.  With the recent approval from the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission to begin operations in the Hubei province, AIA Group now has operations in eight provinces, providing what we consider to be a unique platform to further penetrate this increasingly large market.

Recent Portfolio Activity

BuysSells
NoneNone

Consistent with our long-term horizon and low turnover, there were no new purchases or sales completed during the quarter.

Conclusion

As we turn the page on another year, we are reminded of the fleeting nature of headline news.  Our focus is not on factors that will change in the coming months, but rather on the fundamentals of businesses that may persist for years.

Rather than attempting the impossible task of predicting the unpredictable, we remain steadfast in abiding by our investment philosophy and process that have been in place for nearly 25 years.  By utilizing a long-term approach and identifying what we perceive to be high-quality businesses, trading at discounts to our estimates of their intrinsic value, that possess catalysts within management’s control, we believe we can withstand short-term swings and add lasting value for our clients.

Disclosures

*Value of New Business (VONB) is an insurance term for the present value of new business written during a period

The opinions expressed herein are those of Aristotle Capital Management, LLC (Aristotle Capital) and are subject to change without notice. Past performance is not a guarantee or indicator of future results. This material is not financial advice or an offer to buy or sell any product. You should not assume that any of the securities transactions, sectors or holdings discussed in this report were or will be profitable, or that recommendations Aristotle Capital makes in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of the securities listed in this report. The portfolio characteristics shown relate to the Aristotle International Equity ADR strategy. Not every client’s account will have these characteristics. Aristotle Capital reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs. There is no assurance that any securities discussed herein will remain in an account’s portfolio at the time you receive this report or that securities sold have not been repurchased. The securities discussed may not represent an account’s entire portfolio and, in the aggregate, may represent only a small percentage of an account’s portfolio holdings. The performance attribution presented is of a representative account from Aristotle Capital’s International Equity ADR Composite. The representative account is a discretionary client account which was chosen to most closely reflect the investment style of the strategy. The criteria used for representative account selection is based on the account’s period of time under management and its similarity of holdings in relation to the strategy. Recommendations made in the last 12 months are available upon request.

Returns are presented gross and net of investment advisory fees and include the reinvestment of all income. Gross returns will be reduced by fees and other expenses that may be incurred in the management of the account. For example, a 0.5% annual fee deducted quarterly (0.125%) from an account with a ten-year annualized growth rate of 5.0% will produce a net result of 4.4%. Actual performance results will vary from this example. Please see important disclosures enclosed within this document. The MSCI EAFE Index (Europe, Australasia, Far East) is a free float-adjusted market capitalization-weighted index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the United States and Canada. The MSCI EAFE Index consists of the following 21 developed market country indices: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, Singapore, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. The MSCI ACWI captures large and mid cap representation across 23 developed market countries and 25 emerging markets countries. With approximately 3,000 constituents, the Index covers approximately 85% of the global investable equity opportunity set. The MSCI ACWI Growth Index captures large and mid cap securities exhibiting overall growth style characteristics across 23 developed markets countries and 25 emerging markets countries. The MSCI ACWI Value Index captures large and mid cap securities exhibiting overall value style characteristics across 23 developed markets countries and 25 emerging markets countries. The MSCI ACWI ex USA Index captures large and mid cap representation across 22 of 23 developed markets countries (excluding the United States) and 25 emerging markets countries. With over 2,300 constituents, the Index covers approximately 85% of the global equity opportunity set outside the United States. The MSCI Emerging Markets Index is a free float-adjusted market capitalization-weighted index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of emerging markets. The MSCI Emerging Markets Index consists of the following 25 emerging market country indexes: Brazil, Chile, China, Colombia, Czech Republic, Egypt, Greece, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Korea, Kuwait, Malaysia, Mexico, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Qatar, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey and United Arab Emirates. The S&P 500® Index is the Standard & Poor’s Composite Index of 500 stocks and is a widely recognized, unmanaged index of common stock prices. The Brent Crude Oil Index is a major trading classification of sweet light crude oil that serves as a major benchmark price for purchases of oil worldwide. The MSCI Japan Index is designed to measure the performance of the large and mid cap segments of the Japanese market. With over 250 constituents, the Index covers approximately 85% of the free float-adjusted market capitalization in Japan. The Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond Index is a flagship measure of global investment grade debt from 28 local currency markets. This multi-currency benchmark includes treasury, government-related, corporate and securitized fixed-rate bonds from both developed and emerging markets issuers. The MSCI United Kingdom Index is designed to measure the performance of the large and mid cap segments of the U.K. market. With nearly 100 constituents, the Index covers approximately 85% of the free float-adjusted market capitalization in the United Kingdom. The MSCI Europe Index captures large and mid cap representation across 15 developed markets countries in Europe. With over 430 constituents, the Index covers approximately 85% of the free float-adjusted market capitalization across the European developed markets equity universe. These indices have been selected as the benchmarks and are used for comparison purposes only. The volatility (beta) of the Composite may be greater or less than the respective benchmarks. It is not possible to invest directly in these indices.

Aristotle Capital Management, LLC is an independent registered investment adviser under the Advisers Act of 1940, as amended. Registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training.  More information about Aristotle Capital, including our investment strategies, fees and objectives, can be found in our Form ADV Part 2, which is available upon request. ACM-2201-145-UBSFA

Performance Disclosures

 

 

Composite returns for all periods ended December 31, 2021 are preliminary pending final account reconciliation.
The performance information presented is based on the Aristotle International Equity ADR Composite.
Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance results for periods greater than one year have been annualized. Returns are presented gross and net of investment advisory fees and include the reinvestment of all income. Gross returns will be reduced by fees and other expenses that may be incurred in the management of the account. For example, a 0.5% annual fee deducted quarterly (0.125%) from an account with a ten-year annualized growth rate of 5.0% will produce a net result of 4.4%. Actual performance results will vary from this example. Please see important disclosures enclosed within this document

FOR PRESENTATION TO MERRILL LYNCH WEALTH MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL ADVISORS ONLY

(All MSCI index returns are shown net and in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.)

Markets Review

Global Markets (total return) performed as follows:

Sources: SS&C Advent, Bloomberg
Past performance is not indicative of future results. Aristotle International Equity ADR Composite returns are presented gross and net of investment advisory fees and include the reinvestment of all income. Aristotle Capital Composite returns are preliminary pending final account reconciliation. Please see important disclosures at the end of this document.

After declining in the third quarter of 2021, global equity markets rebounded during the fourth quarter.  Overall, the MSCI ACWI Index climbed 6.68% during the period, which brings its full-year return to 18.54%.  Concurrently, the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond Index pulled back 0.67%, which gives the Index a calendar-year return of -4.71%.  In terms of style, value stocks underperformed their growth counterparts during the quarter, with the MSCI ACWI Value Index trailing the MSCI ACWI Growth Index by 0.67%. However, for the full year, the MSCI ACWI Value outperformed the MSCI ACWI Growth by 2.52%.

The MSCI EAFE Index rose 2.69% during the fourth quarter, while the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index gained 1.82%.  Regionally, the U.K. and Europe & Middle East were the strongest performers, while Asia was the weakest.  On a sector basis, nine out of the eleven sectors within the MSCI EAFE Index posted positive returns, led by Utilities, Materials and Consumer Staples.  Conversely, Communication Services, Energy and Real Estate were the worst-performing sectors.

Similar to previous quarters, investors focused on the progress of the global recovery.  Although corporate revenues and earnings continued to rebound during the period, the IMF announced a slight downward revision to its 2021 global real GDP growth projections due to continued supply disruptions and uncertain pandemic dynamics.  These conditions have caused shortages of key inputs, lowered manufacturing activity and fueled inflation across the globe.

In addition to a global shipping crisis and semiconductor shortages, the energy sector also captured numerous headlines as robust demand outpaced supply, causing prices to surge.  After a historic drop in energy consumption in 2020, the global economic recovery and a long and cold winter in the Northern Hemisphere have driven a strong rebound in demand, while the ongoing shift to renewables has impacted production and future investments in fossil fuels.  Although OPEC and countries such as Russia have pledged to boost supply, the energy crunch has highlighted issues in long-term production.  Furthermore, rising energy prices have contributed to an inflation loop as the prices of energy-intensive materials like nickel, steel and silicon have all risen.

Increased inflation, combined with an uncertain recovery, has created policy challenges for central banks.  On one hand, the rhetoric on inflation being “transitory” softened as many central banks took a hawkish approach.  During the quarter, the European Central Bank announced a gradual phaseout of its bond purchase program, while countries like the U.K., Russia and Mexico raised interest rates.  On the other hand, policy in Southeast Asia was largely unchanged, and China announced an easing of its monetary policy that will likely include further cuts to lending rates.

On the COVID front, the Omicron variant became the dominant strain in areas such as the U.K. and the U.S.  The number of new daily cases reached as high as ~1,750,000, the highest reported figure during the pandemic, with Europe and the Americas reporting the greatest number of cases.

Annual Markets Review

In a year filled with uncertainty, global economies proved largely resilient.  Even in the face of supply-chain disruptions and multiple variants of the COVID-19 virus, global recovery continued throughout the period.  Themes from 2020, such as central bank policy decisions and vaccine distribution, persisted.

Although we are happy to report another strong year, the constant twists, turns and pivots of this past year are a reminder of the fragility of the short term. Factors such as the possibility of new variants, the timing of a full recovery, fiscal and monetary policy decisions, and market sentiment are topics better left for reporters. We believe investment managers (and their clients) are best positioned to create lasting value by minimizing distractions and focusing on the long term.

Performance and Attribution Summary

For the fourth quarter of 2021, Aristotle Capital’s International Equity ADR Composite posted a total U.S. dollar return of 4.67% gross of fees (4.56% net of fees), outperforming the MSCI EAFE Index, which returned 2.69%, and the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index, which returned 1.82%.  Please refer to the table below for detailed performance.

Performance (%) 4Q211
Year
3
Years
5
Years
Since
Inception*
Int’l Equity ADR Composite (gross)4.6716.1716.2912.267.99
Int’l Equity ADR Composite (net)4.5615.5815.8111.817.48
MSCI EAFE Index (net)2.6911.2613.539.546.44
MSCI ACWI ex USA Index (net)1.827.8213.179.606.03
*The inception date for the International Equity ADR Composite is June 1, 2013. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Returns are presented gross and net of investment advisory fees and include the reinvestment of all income. Aristotle Capital Composite returns are preliminary pending final account reconciliation. Please see important disclosures at the end of this document.

From a sector perspective, the portfolio’s outperformance relative to the MSCI EAFE Index can be attributed to security selection. Security selection in Information Technology, Financials and Industrials contributed the most to the portfolio’s relative performance.  Conversely, security selection in Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services and a lack of exposure to Utilities detracted from relative return. 

Source: FactSet

Past performance is not indicative of future results. Attribution results are based on sector returns, which are gross of investment advisory fees and include the reinvestment of all income. Please see important disclosures at the end of this document..

Regionally, both security selection and allocation effects were responsible for the portfolio’s outperformance.  Security selection in Europe & Middle East and an overweight in Canada contributed the most to relative performance, while an underweight in Europe & Middle East and security selection in the United Kingdom detracted.

Contributors and Detractors for 4Q 2021

Relative ContributorsRelative Detractors
AccenturePan Pacific International
Brookfield Asset ManagementKDDI
SonyOtsuka Holdings
Dassault SystèmesAIA Group
ExperianCarnival

Accenture, the global IT services and consulting firm, was the top contributor during the quarter. Shares continued their impressive performance as the company reported strong results, benefiting from accelerating digital transformations across all markets and industries—a catalyst we previously identified.  Revenue for every client industry group that Accenture services increased by double digits from the prior year.  Furthermore, the company added 15 Diamond Clients (its most important tier of client) in the first quarter of FY 2022 alone, more than it onboarded for the entirety of FY 2021.  We believe Accenture remains uniquely equipped to capitalize on the continuing trend of compressed digital transformations, where enterprises demand comprehensive digital and cloud transformations in a shorter time period.  What is striking is that Accenture believes only one-third of the industry has implemented compressed transformation, leaving ample runway for further adoption.  In addition, given Accenture’s strong value proposition of providing IT solutions to its long-standing client base of many of the world’s largest companies, we believe it is well positioned to pass on inflationary cost pressures through future price increases, as management intends.

Canada-based alternative asset manager Brookfield Asset Management was also a top contributor during the quarter, as it has continued its fundraising momentum, having raised more than $34 billion in the second half of 2021, and built out significant scale across its private markets offerings. The inflows during the quarter were largely driven by the firm’s flagship funds, including its real estate and infrastructure funds.  Through these funds, Brookfield both develops and operates properties across the globe, as well as infrastructure assets that span utilities, transportation and data centers.  Also positive for Brookfield, carried interest revenue, additional compensation it receives for high-performing investment funds, rose 9% quarter-over-quarter, a testament to its ongoing stronger realizations of incentive fees.  Moreover, the firm has seen sustained outsized demand from institutional investors for its physical asset funds, a catalyst we’ve identified, with management in December expressing its flexibility to potentially increase the future size of these funds.

Pan Pacific International, the Japanese discount and general merchandise retailer, was the quarter’s largest detractor. Operating profits declined more than 30% year-over-year.  This was in part due to lower foot traffic during a rainy season in Japan, coupled with a recently more difficult pandemic environment.  Spending on technology investments, renovations and new store openings also compressed margins.  However, we view these headwinds as temporary, and the investments, renovations and new openings as appropriate capital allocation, and continue to focus on the long-term strength of the business.  Pan Pacific’s Don Quijote stores create a sense of treasure hunt that elicits high entertainment value—a unique business model that we believe will allow for organic market share gains in Japan, as well expansion overseas.  With the company’s demonstrated ability to turn around competitors’ stores, in our opinion, it also stands to benefit from the ongoing conversion of its acquired UNY locations.

AIA Group, a pan-Asian life insurance company headquartered in Hong Kong, was one of the largest detractors for the quarter. Shares declined despite continued improvements in fundamentals and progress further establishing AIA Group’s direct presence in mainland China, a catalyst we previously identified.  AIA Group has benefited from an increasingly technology-enabled and productive agency salesforce; we believe this has helped the company deftly navigate pandemic-related travel restrictions.  In fact, the company’s VONB* advanced 15% in the first nine months of 2021, with all areas outside of Hong Kong exceeding pre-pandemic levels.  In our opinion, the advances in mainland China are more notable than the interim results.  With the recent approval from the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission to begin operations in the Hubei province, AIA Group now has operations in eight provinces, providing what we consider to be a unique platform to further penetrate this increasingly large market.

Recent Portfolio Activity

BuysSells
NoneNone

Consistent with our long-term horizon and low turnover, there were no new purchases or sales completed during the quarter.

Conclusion

As we turn the page on another year, we are reminded of the fleeting nature of headline news.  Our focus is not on factors that will change in the coming months, but rather on the fundamentals of businesses that may persist for years.

Rather than attempting the impossible task of predicting the unpredictable, we remain steadfast in abiding by our investment philosophy and process that have been in place for nearly 25 years.  By utilizing a long-term approach and identifying what we perceive to be high-quality businesses, trading at discounts to our estimates of their intrinsic value, that possess catalysts within management’s control, we believe we can withstand short-term swings and add lasting value for our clients.

Disclosures

*Value of New Business (VONB) is an insurance term for the present value of new business written during a period

The opinions expressed herein are those of Aristotle Capital Management, LLC (Aristotle Capital) and are subject to change without notice. Past performance is not a guarantee or indicator of future results. This material is not financial advice or an offer to buy or sell any product. You should not assume that any of the securities transactions, sectors or holdings discussed in this report were or will be profitable, or that recommendations Aristotle Capital makes in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of the securities listed in this report. The portfolio characteristics shown relate to the Aristotle International Equity ADR strategy. Not every client’s account will have these characteristics. Aristotle Capital reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs. There is no assurance that any securities discussed herein will remain in an account’s portfolio at the time you receive this report or that securities sold have not been repurchased. The securities discussed may not represent an account’s entire portfolio and, in the aggregate, may represent only a small percentage of an account’s portfolio holdings. The performance attribution presented is of a representative account from Aristotle Capital’s International Equity ADR Composite. The representative account is a discretionary client account which was chosen to most closely reflect the investment style of the strategy. The criteria used for representative account selection is based on the account’s period of time under management and its similarity of holdings in relation to the strategy. Recommendations made in the last 12 months are available upon request.

Returns are presented gross and net of investment advisory fees and include the reinvestment of all income. Gross returns will be reduced by fees and other expenses that may be incurred in the management of the account. For example, a 0.5% annual fee deducted quarterly (0.125%) from an account with a ten-year annualized growth rate of 5.0% will produce a net result of 4.4%. Actual performance results will vary from this example. Please see important disclosures enclosed within this document. The MSCI EAFE Index (Europe, Australasia, Far East) is a free float-adjusted market capitalization-weighted index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the United States and Canada. The MSCI EAFE Index consists of the following 21 developed market country indices: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, Singapore, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. The MSCI ACWI captures large and mid cap representation across 23 developed market countries and 25 emerging markets countries. With approximately 3,000 constituents, the Index covers approximately 85% of the global investable equity opportunity set. The MSCI ACWI Growth Index captures large and mid cap securities exhibiting overall growth style characteristics across 23 developed markets countries and 25 emerging markets countries. The MSCI ACWI Value Index captures large and mid cap securities exhibiting overall value style characteristics across 23 developed markets countries and 25 emerging markets countries. The MSCI ACWI ex USA Index captures large and mid cap representation across 22 of 23 developed markets countries (excluding the United States) and 25 emerging markets countries. With over 2,300 constituents, the Index covers approximately 85% of the global equity opportunity set outside the United States. The MSCI Emerging Markets Index is a free float-adjusted market capitalization-weighted index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of emerging markets. The MSCI Emerging Markets Index consists of the following 25 emerging market country indexes: Brazil, Chile, China, Colombia, Czech Republic, Egypt, Greece, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Korea, Kuwait, Malaysia, Mexico, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Qatar, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey and United Arab Emirates. The S&P 500® Index is the Standard & Poor’s Composite Index of 500 stocks and is a widely recognized, unmanaged index of common stock prices. The Brent Crude Oil Index is a major trading classification of sweet light crude oil that serves as a major benchmark price for purchases of oil worldwide. The MSCI Japan Index is designed to measure the performance of the large and mid cap segments of the Japanese market. With over 250 constituents, the Index covers approximately 85% of the free float-adjusted market capitalization in Japan. The Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond Index is a flagship measure of global investment grade debt from 28 local currency markets. This multi-currency benchmark includes treasury, government-related, corporate and securitized fixed-rate bonds from both developed and emerging markets issuers. The MSCI United Kingdom Index is designed to measure the performance of the large and mid cap segments of the U.K. market. With nearly 100 constituents, the Index covers approximately 85% of the free float-adjusted market capitalization in the United Kingdom. The MSCI Europe Index captures large and mid cap representation across 15 developed markets countries in Europe. With over 430 constituents, the Index covers approximately 85% of the free float-adjusted market capitalization across the European developed markets equity universe. These indices have been selected as the benchmarks and are used for comparison purposes only. The volatility (beta) of the Composite may be greater or less than the respective benchmarks. It is not possible to invest directly in these indices.

Aristotle Capital Management, LLC is an independent registered investment adviser under the Advisers Act of 1940, as amended. Registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training. More information about Aristotle Capital, including our investment strategies, fees and objectives, can be found in our Form ADV Part 2, which is available upon request. ACM-2201-145-MLFA

Performance Disclosures

 

Composite returns for all periods ended December 31, 2021 are preliminary pending final account reconciliation.
The performance information presented is based on the Aristotle International Equity ADR Composite.
Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance results for periods greater than one year have been annualized. Returns are presented gross and net of investment advisory fees and include the reinvestment of all income. Gross returns will be reduced by fees and other expenses that may be incurred in the management of the account. For example, a 0.5% annual fee deducted quarterly (0.125%) from an account with a ten-year annualized growth rate of 5.0% will produce a net result of 4.4%. Actual performance results will vary from this example. Please see important disclosures
enclosed within this document.

FOR FINANCIAL ADVISORS ONLY.  NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION.

Markets Review

Markets (total return) performed as follows:

Sources: SS&C Advent, Bloomberg
Past performance is not indicative of future results. Aristotle Value Equity Composite returns are presented gross and net of investment advisory fees and include the reinvestment of all income. Aristotle Capital Composite returns are preliminary pending final account reconciliation. Please see important disclosures at the end of this document.

The U.S. equity market finished the year strong, recording its seventh consecutive quarter of positive performance. Overall, the S&P 500 Index gained 11.03% during the period, which brings its full-year return to 28.71%. Concurrently, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index finished flat for the quarter, which gives the Index a calendar-year return of -1.54%. In terms of style, the Russell 1000 Value Index underperformed its growth counterpart by 3.87% during the quarter, resulting in its full-year underperformance of 2.44%.

On a sector basis, ten out of eleven sectors within the Russell 1000 Value Index finished higher for the quarter, led by Real Estate, Materials and Utilities. The worst performers were Communication Services, the only sector to finish in the red, followed by Financials and Information Technology.

Economic data points were mixed during the period. Although the unemployment rate fell to 4.2%, inching to levels not seen since 2019, the U.S. economy created fewer jobs than expected, as November nonfarm payrolls increased just 210,000. Nonetheless, inflation garnered the most attention as the CPI, driven by energy, food, and used car and truck prices, rose 6.8% on a year-over-year basis—the fastest rate since 1982. Correspondingly, the Federal Reserve (Fed) ceased the use of “transitory” in reference to inflation and subsequently accelerated the tapering of its asset purchase program. Furthermore, new projections based on the median forecast by Fed officials signaled the possibility of three interest rate increases in the new year.

Meanwhile, fiscal policy also made headlines as the $1 trillion bipartisan infrastructure bill was signed into law. However, momentum for the now $1.7 trillion Build Back Better social spending and climate bill stalled, largely due to disagreements over the scope and size of the bill.

In terms of corporate earnings, labor shortages and supply-chain disruptions, specifically procurement issues and input price pressures, continued to impact businesses. Nevertheless, corporate earnings were robust, with year-over-year earnings per share (EPS) growth for S&P 500 constituents reaching nearly 40%, the third-highest figure since 2010, and 82% of S&P 500 companies beating EPS estimates. Additionally, nearly two out of three S&P 500 companies reported improving profitability since the start of the pandemic, citing pricing power and strong demand.

On the COVID front, the Omicron variant became the dominant strain in the U.S., with the number of new daily cases rising to upwards of 500,000, the highest reported figure during the pandemic.

Annual Markets Review

In a year filled with uncertainty, the U.S. economy proved resilient. Even in the face of inflation, supply-chain disruptions, labor shortages and COVID-19 variants, many businesses reported strong earnings growth and stable, if not improving, margins. Themes from 2020, such as fiscal and monetary policy actions, vaccine (and now booster) developments, and economic recovery persisted.

Although we are happy to report another strong year, the constant twists, turns and pivots of this past year are a reminder of the fragility of the short-term. Factors such as the possibility of new variants, the timing of a full recovery, fiscal and monetary policy decisions, and market sentiment are topics better left for reporters. We believe investment managers (and their clients) are best positioned to create lasting value by minimizing distractions and focusing on the longterm.

Performance and Attribution Summary

For the fourth quarter of 2021, Aristotle Capital’s Value Equity Composite posted a total return of 7.86% gross of fees (7.80% net of fees), outperforming the 7.77% return of the Russell 1000 Value Index and underperforming the 11.03% return of the S&P 500 Index. Please refer to the table for detailed performance.

Performance (%) 4Q21 YTD3 Years5 Years10 Years
Value Equity Composite (gross)7.8625.8724.6416.8816.82
Value Equity Composite (net)7.8025.5424.2916.5216.43
Russell 1000 Value Index7.7725.1617.6211.1612.96
S&P 500 Index11.0328.7126.0418.4616.54
Past performance is not indicative of future results. Returns are presented gross and net of investment advisory fees and include the reinvestment of all income. Aristotle Capital Composite returns are preliminary pending final account reconciliation. Please see important disclosures at the end of this document.

Source: FactSet
Past performance is not indicative of future results. Attribution results are based on sector returns, which are gross of investment advisory fees and include the reinvestment of all income. Please see important disclosures at the end of this document.

The portfolio’s outperformance relative to the Russell 1000 Value Index this quarter can be attributed to allocation effects, while security selection had a negative impact. Security selection in Information Technology and Materials and an underweight in Communication Services contributed the most to relative performance. Conversely, security selection in Health Care, Communication Services and Financials detracted. (Relative weights are the result of bottom-up security selection.)

Aggregates producer Martin Marietta Materials was one of the top contributors for the period, as it delivered quarterly (and year-to-date) records for revenues and gross profit. A unique combination of higher organic volumes and price increases was able to offset significantly higher energy-related costs. The company also completed its acquisition of Lehigh Hanson’s West Region business, the second-largest acquisition in its history, increasing the firm’s presence in California and Arizona. Past acquisitions, including Texas Industries and Bluegrass Materials, have been, in our opinion, successfully integrated and have positioned the company with a coast-to-coast footprint and meaningful presence in states with high population inflows and what we think are solid underlying economies (i.e., Texas, Colorado, California, North Carolina, Georgia and Florida). Consistent with its acquisition practices, the company is committed to lowering its debt within the next 18 months. We believe the firm’s prudent capital spending, valueenhancing acquisitions, FREE cash flow generation and “value over volume” pricing strategy position the company to continue to benefit from secular demand trends, including single-family housing and federal and state-level infrastructure investment, as well as nonresidential construction (e.g., warehouse and data centers).

Lennar, one of the nation’s largest homebuilders, was a primary contributor for the quarter. Despite supply-chain challenges affecting everything from the ability to source garage doors, windows and paint, to labor shortages impacting numerous installations, Lennar was able to deliver 18,000 homes during the quarter, an 11% yearover- year growth in deliveries, while also achieving gross and net margin improvements. Such results highlight management’s focus and ability to execute amidst challenging short-term conditions while continuing to deliver on its longer-term strategic plan. To that effect, the firm made progress toward its asset-light model, where currently it controls more than half of its land through the use of options (up from 39% in 2020). This has enhanced the company’s FREE cash flow generation, allowing for the retirement of $850 million of debt and the repurchase of nearly $1 billion in stock in the most recent quarter. Furthermore, as part of its long-time efforts to incorporate technology into its business, Lennar announced commitments with Veev, a vertically integrated end-to-end panelized building technology company, and ICON, a 3D printing construction technology company, to build new communities utilizing their innovative technologies.

PayPal Holdings, the online and mobile e-commerce payments company, was a leading detractor for the period, as investors and analysts seemed focused on the threat of increased competition, as well as quarterly results that fell short of expectations. Nevertheless, PayPal still reported double-digit increases in total payment volume and revenue growth, as well as 13.3 million net new active accounts, bringing the platform’s total to 416 million active accounts. Over the past decade, we have studied PayPal’s ability to grow its extensive dual network (difficult to replicate, in our opinion) while navigating numerous competitors entering the industry. Although there may continue to be short-term headwinds and volatility in the share price, we remain focused on the fundamental advancements and long-term prospects of the business. During the quarter, the company announced that Amazon will be enabling U.S. customers to pay with Venmo, United will allow PayPal QR codes as an inflight payment option, and Honey will be expanding shopping rewards with the introduction of cash back through PayPal. We feel these partnerships display the strength of the PayPal brand, demonstrate progress on catalysts like the monetization of Venmo and enhance the overall PayPal platform.

Medtronic, a U.S.-based global provider of medical devices, was one of the largest detractors for the period following slower reported revenue growth and reduced revenue guidance for the fiscal year. Medtronic (like other businesses) is still facing pandemic-related headwinds, as staffing shortages and patient decisions have, we believe, temporarily reduced demand for non-essential medical procedures. The share price decline was exacerbated by a warning letter issued by the FDA and related to a facility where Medtronic manufactures diabetes pumps (the Diabetes business is 10% of total revenue). While clearly a negative, warning letters are not uncommon, and this matter pertains to legacy issues that Medtronic is actively engaged with the FDA on resolving fully and as quickly as possible. We will be monitoring the situation and may have more to share in the future. Despite short-term setbacks, Medtronic’s focus on innovation has allowed it to continue gaining share in the majority of its businesses while delivering on its goal to partner more closely with hospitals by offering a greater range of products (a shift in strategy that goes back to its merger with Covidien in 2016). We believe the combination of an emphasis on innovation and providing hospitals with value added services bodes well, as the healthcare system starts placing more emphasis on outcomes rather than products.

Contributors and Detractors for 4Q 2021

Relative ContributorsRelative Detractors
QualcommPayPal Holdings
Martin Marietta MaterialsTwitter
MicrosoftCapital One Financial
LennarAdobe
RPM InternationalMedtronic

Recent Portfolio Activity

BuysSells
Constellation BrandsNovartis

During the quarter, we sold our position in Novartis and used the proceeds to invest in Constellation Brands.

Novartis went through much change during our more than six-year holding period. Vasant (“Vas”) Narasimhan was promoted to CEO in early 2018 and, we believe, has positively influenced the company’s culture. Vas also helped shift the business more toward innovative medicines. Examples include the sale of Novartis’s consumer (over-the-counter) joint venture with GlaxoSmithKline and the spinoff of Alcon, a global leader in the treatment of eye diseases and eye conditions. While we continue to believe Novartis possesses Q-V-C characteristics, we decided to exit our investment in favor of what we view to be a more optimal opportunity in Constellation Brands.

Constellation Brands, Inc.

Founded in 1945 in upstate New York, Constellation Brands is a producer and marketer of beer, wine and spirits. The business grew to scale primarily as a purveyor of wine and spirits but, through M&A, has repositioned itself away from lower-end wine and spirit labels and toward premium beer. With more than $8 billion in annual revenue, Constellation is now the third-largest beer company by market share in the U.S.

Beer sales (~75% of revenue) are anchored by a set of premium Mexican trademarks, including Corona, Modelo and Pacifico. In 2013, Constellation acquired the exclusive and perpetual U.S. distribution rights for these Mexican brands from AB InBev, which had to divest due to antitrust mandates. Constellation’s Wine & Spirits segment (~25%) consists of brands such as Kim Crawford, Meiomi, The Prisoner and Svedka Vodka. It also owns a ~35% stake in Canopy Growth, a prominent Canadian provider of medicinal and recreational cannabis products.

High-Quality Business

Some of the quality characteristics we have identified for Constellation Brands include:

  • Leading market share with more than 80% of the fast-growing Mexican imports segment of U.S. beer. Modelo is the best-selling imported beer in the U.S., and Pacifico is one of the quickest-rising imports
  • Strong management team with a demonstrated ability to successfully market imports to mainstream U.S. populations, gain market share and ramp up distribution of new brands, forge deep relations with distributors and retailers, and expand shelf space with innovations; and
  • The broad resonance of its top-tier brands and premium positioning supports more productive per-dollar promotional spending, affording it best-in-class operating margins among brewers of roughly 40%.

Attractive Valuation

We believe Constellation Brands is attractively valued based on our estimates of higher normalized FREE cash flow due to increased market penetration of its beer labels and enhanced margins for its portfolio of wines.

Compelling Catalysts

Catalysts we have identified for Constellation Brands, which we believe will cause its stock price to appreciate over our three- to five-year investment horizon, include:

  • Constellation’s near monopoly on Mexican beer distribution in the U.S., as well as its hard-to-replicate production capabilities in Mexico, uniquely position it to benefit from the growing Hispanic demographic and increasing popularity of Mexican beer in the U.S.;
  • Continued shelf-space gains, as well as further penetration in bars and restaurants for the Beer segment, as its brands have a small share of total distribution points but a relatively high percentage of sales per distribution point; and
  • Improved margins in Constellation’s Wine & Spirits segment following divestment of its less-profitable, lower-end wine brands.

Conclusion

As we turn the page on another year, we are reminded of the fleeting nature of headline news. Our focus is not on factors that will change in the coming months, but rather on the fundamentals of businesses that may persist for years.

Rather than attempting the impossible task of predicting the unpredictable, we remain steadfast in abiding by our investment philosophy and process that have been in place for nearly 25 years. By utilizing a long-term approach and identifying what we perceive to be high-quality businesses, trading at discounts to our estimates of their intrinsic value, that possess catalysts within management’s control, we believe we can withstand short-term swings and add lasting value for our clients.

Disclosures

The opinions expressed herein are those of Aristotle Capital Management, LLC (Aristotle Capital) and are subject to change without notice. Past performance is not a guarantee or indicator of future results.

This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. You should not assume that any of the securities transactions, sectors or holdings discussed in this report were or will be profitable, or that recommendations Aristotle Capital makes in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of the securities listed in this report. The portfolio characteristics shown relate to the Aristotle Value Equity strategy. Not every client’s account will have these characteristics. Aristotle Capital reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs. There is no assurance that any securities discussed herein will remain in an account’s portfolio at the time you receive this report or that securities sold have not been repurchased. The securities discussed may not represent an account’s entire portfolio and, in the aggregate, may represent only a small percentage of an account’s portfolio holdings. The performance attribution presented is of a representative account from Aristotle Capital’s Value Equity Composite. The representative account is a discretionary client account which was chosen to most closely reflect the investment style of the strategy. The criteria used for representative account selection is based on the account’s period of time under management and its similarity of holdings in relation to the strategy. Recommendations made in the last 12 months are available upon request.

Returns are presented gross and net of investment advisory fees and include the reinvestment of all income. Gross returns will be reduced by fees and other expenses that may be incurred in the management of the account. For example, a 0.5% annual fee deducted quarterly (0.125%) from an account with a ten-year annualized growth rate of 5.0% will produce a net result of 4.4%. Actual performance results will vary from this example.

The Russell 1000 Value® Index measures the performance of the large cap value segment of the U.S. equity universe. It includes those Russell 1000 Index companies with lower price-to-book ratios and lower expected growth values. The S&P 500® Index is the Standard & Poor’s Composite Index of 500 stocks and is a widely recognized, unmanaged index of common stock prices. The Russell 1000® Growth Index measures the performance of the large cap growth segment of the U.S. equity universe. It includes those Russell 1000 companies with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values. The Russell 2000® Index measures the performance of the small cap segment of the U.S. equity universe. The Russell 2000 Index is a subset of the Russell 3000® Index representing approximately 10% of the total market capitalization of that index. It includes approximately 2,000 of the smallest securities based on a combination of their market cap and current index membership. The Dow Jones Industrial Average® is a price-weighted measure of 30 U.S. blue-chip companies. The Index covers all industries except transportation and utilities. The NASDAQ Composite Index measures all NASDAQ domestic and international based common type stocks listed on The NASDAQ Stock Market. The NASDAQ Composite includes over 3,000 companies, more than most other stock market indexes. The Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index is an unmanaged index of domestic investment grade bonds, including corporate, government and mortgage-backed securities. The WTI Crude Oil Index is a major trading classification of sweet light crude oil that serves as a major benchmark price for oil consumed in the United States. The 3-Month U.S. Treasury Bill is a short-term debt obligation backed by the U.S. Treasury Department with a maturity of three months. The volatility (beta) of the Composite may be greater or less than its respective benchmarks. It is not possible to invest directly in these indices.

This presentation is to report on the investment strategies as reported by Aristotle Capital Management, LLC and is for illustrative purposes only. The information contained herein is obtained from multiple sources and believed to be reliable. Information has not been verified by Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, and may differ from documents created by Morgan Stanley Wealth Management. The financial advisor should refer to the Profile. This must be preceded or accompanied by the Morgan Stanley Wealth Management Profile, which you can obtain from the Morgan Stanley Wealth Management Performance Analytics. For additional information on other programs, please speak to Patrick Schussman at Aristotle Capital at (310) 954-8156.

Aristotle Capital Management, LLC is an independent registered investment adviser under the Advisers Act of 1940, as amended. Registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training. More information about Aristotle Capital, including our investment strategies, fees and objectives, can be found in our ADV Part 2, which is available upon request. ACM-2201-30-MSFA

Performance Disclosures

 

 

 

Composite returns for all periods ended December 31, 2021 are preliminary pending fi nal account reconciliation.
Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance results for periods greater than one year have been annualized. Returns presented are gross and net of investment advisory fees and include the reinvestment of all income. The Aristotle Value Equity strategy has an inception date of November 1, 2010; however, the strategy initially began at Mr. Gleicher’s predecessor firm in October 1997. A supplemental performance track record from January 1, 2001 through October 31, 2010 is provided above. The returns are based on two separate accounts and performance results are based on custodian data. During this time, Mr. Gleicher had primary responsibility for managing the two accounts. Mr. Gleicher began managing one account in November 2000 and the other December 2000. Please see important disclosures enclosed within this document.

FOR FINANCIAL ADVISORS ONLY. NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION.

Markets Review

Markets (total return) performed as follows:

Sources: SS&C Advent, Bloomberg
Past performance is not indicative of future results. Aristotle Value Equity Composite returns are presented gross and net of investment advisory fees and include the reinvestment of all income. Aristotle Capital Composite returns are preliminary pending final account reconciliation. Please see important disclosures at the end of this document.

The U.S. equity market finished the year strong, recording its seventh consecutive quarter of positive performance. Overall, the S&P 500 Index gained 11.03% during the period, which brings its full-year return to 28.71%. Concurrently, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index finished flat for the quarter, which gives the Index a calendar-year return of -1.54%. In terms of style, the Russell 1000 Value Index underperformed its growth counterpart by 3.87% during the quarter, resulting in its full-year underperformance of 2.44%.

On a sector basis, ten out of eleven sectors within the Russell 1000 Value Index finished higher for the quarter, led by Real Estate, Materials and Utilities. The worst performers were Communication Services, the only sector to finish in the red, followed by Financials and Information Technology.

Economic data points were mixed during the period. Although the unemployment rate fell to 4.2%, inching to levels not seen since 2019, the U.S. economy created fewer jobs than expected, as November nonfarm payrolls increased just 210,000. Nonetheless, inflation garnered the most attention as the CPI, driven by energy, food, and used car and truck prices, rose 6.8% on a year-over-year basis—the fastest rate since 1982. Correspondingly, the Federal Reserve (Fed) ceased the use of “transitory” in reference to inflation and subsequently accelerated the tapering of its asset purchase program. Furthermore, new projections based on the median forecast by Fed officials signaled the possibility of three interest rate increases in the new year.

Meanwhile, fiscal policy also made headlines as the $1 trillion bipartisan infrastructure bill was signed into law. However, momentum for the now $1.7 trillion Build Back Better social spending and climate bill stalled, largely due to disagreements over the scope and size of the bill.

In terms of corporate earnings, labor shortages and supply-chain disruptions, specifically procurement issues and input price pressures, continued to impact businesses. Nevertheless, corporate earnings were robust, with year-over-year earnings per share (EPS) growth for S&P 500 constituents reaching nearly 40%, the third-highest figure since 2010, and 82% of S&P 500 companies beating EPS estimates. Additionally, nearly two out of three S&P 500 companies reported improving profitability since the start of the pandemic, citing pricing power and strong demand.

On the COVID front, the Omicron variant became the dominant strain in the U.S., with the number of new daily cases rising to upwards of 500,000, the highest reported figure during the pandemic.

Annual Markets Review

In a year filled with uncertainty, the U.S. economy proved resilient. Even in the face of inflation, supply-chain disruptions, labor shortages and COVID-19 variants, many businesses reported strong earnings growth and stable, if not improving, margins. Themes from 2020, such as fiscal and monetary policy actions, vaccine (and now booster) developments, and economic recovery persisted.

Although we are happy to report another strong year, the constant twists, turns and pivots of this past year are a reminder of the fragility of the short-term. Factors such as the possibility of new variants, the timing of a full recovery, fiscal and monetary policy decisions, and market sentiment are topics better left for reporters. We believe investment managers (and their clients) are best positioned to create lasting value by minimizing distractions and focusing on the longterm.

Performance and Attribution Summary

For the fourth quarter of 2021, Aristotle Capital’s Value Equity Composite posted a total return of 7.86% gross of fees (7.80% net of fees), outperforming the 7.77% return of the Russell 1000 Value Index and underperforming the 11.03% return of the S&P 500 Index. Please refer to the table for detailed performance.

Performance (%) 4Q21 YTD3 Years5 Years10 Years
Value Equity Composite (gross)7.8625.8724.6416.8816.82
Value Equity Composite (net)7.8025.5424.2916.5216.43
Russell 1000 Value Index7.7725.1617.6211.1612.96
S&P 500 Index11.0328.7126.0418.4616.54
Past performance is not indicative of future results. Returns are presented gross and net of investment advisory fees and include the reinvestment of all income. Aristotle Capital Composite returns are preliminary pending final account reconciliation. Please see important disclosures at the end of this document.

Source: FactSet
Past performance is not indicative of future results. Attribution results are based on sector returns, which are gross of investment advisory fees and include the reinvestment of all income. Please see important disclosures at the end of this document.

The portfolio’s outperformance relative to the Russell 1000 Value Index this quarter can be attributed to allocation effects, while security selection had a negative impact. Security selection in Information Technology and Materials and an underweight in Communication Services contributed the most to relative performance. Conversely, security selection in Health Care, Communication Services and Financials detracted. (Relative weights are the result of bottom-up security selection.)

Aggregates producer Martin Marietta Materials was one of the top contributors for the period, as it delivered quarterly (and year-to-date) records for revenues and gross profit. A unique combination of higher organic volumes and price increases was able to offset significantly higher energy-related costs. The company also completed its acquisition of Lehigh Hanson’s West Region business, the second-largest acquisition in its history, increasing the firm’s presence in California and Arizona. Past acquisitions, including Texas Industries and Bluegrass Materials, have been, in our opinion, successfully integrated and have positioned the company with a coast-to-coast footprint and meaningful presence in states with high population inflows and what we think are solid underlying economies (i.e., Texas, Colorado, California, North Carolina, Georgia and Florida). Consistent with its acquisition practices, the company is committed to lowering its debt within the next 18 months. We believe the firm’s prudent capital spending, valueenhancing acquisitions, FREE cash flow generation and “value over volume” pricing strategy position the company to continue to benefit from secular demand trends, including single-family housing and federal and state-level infrastructure investment, as well as nonresidential construction (e.g., warehouse and data centers).

Lennar, one of the nation’s largest homebuilders, was a primary contributor for the quarter. Despite supply-chain challenges affecting everything from the ability to source garage doors, windows and paint, to labor shortages impacting numerous installations, Lennar was able to deliver 18,000 homes during the quarter, an 11% yearover- year growth in deliveries, while also achieving gross and net margin improvements. Such results highlight management’s focus and ability to execute amidst challenging short-term conditions while continuing to deliver on its longer-term strategic plan. To that effect, the firm made progress toward its asset-light model, where currently it controls more than half of its land through the use of options (up from 39% in 2020). This has enhanced the company’s FREE cash flow generation, allowing for the retirement of $850 million of debt and the repurchase of nearly $1 billion in stock in the most recent quarter. Furthermore, as part of its long-time efforts to incorporate technology into its business, Lennar announced commitments with Veev, a vertically integrated end-to-end panelized building technology company, and ICON, a 3D printing construction technology company, to build new communities utilizing their innovative technologies.

PayPal Holdings, the online and mobile e-commerce payments company, was a leading detractor for the period, as investors and analysts seemed focused on the threat of increased competition, as well as quarterly results that fell short of expectations. Nevertheless, PayPal still reported double-digit increases in total payment volume and revenue growth, as well as 13.3 million net new active accounts, bringing the platform’s total to 416 million active accounts. Over the past decade, we have studied PayPal’s ability to grow its extensive dual network (difficult to replicate, in our opinion) while navigating numerous competitors entering the industry. Although there may continue to be short-term headwinds and volatility in the share price, we remain focused on the fundamental advancements and long-term prospects of the business. During the quarter, the company announced that Amazon will be enabling U.S. customers to pay with Venmo, United will allow PayPal QR codes as an inflight payment option, and Honey will be expanding shopping rewards with the introduction of cash back through PayPal. We feel these partnerships display the strength of the PayPal brand, demonstrate progress on catalysts like the monetization of Venmo and enhance the overall PayPal platform.

Medtronic, a U.S.-based global provider of medical devices, was one of the largest detractors for the period following slower reported revenue growth and reduced revenue guidance for the fiscal year. Medtronic (like other businesses) is still facing pandemic-related headwinds, as staffing shortages and patient decisions have, we believe, temporarily reduced demand for non-essential medical procedures. The share price decline was exacerbated by a warning letter issued by the FDA and related to a facility where Medtronic manufactures diabetes pumps (the Diabetes business is 10% of total revenue). While clearly a negative, warning letters are not uncommon, and this matter pertains to legacy issues that Medtronic is actively engaged with the FDA on resolving fully and as quickly as possible. We will be monitoring the situation and may have more to share in the future. Despite short-term setbacks, Medtronic’s focus on innovation has allowed it to continue gaining share in the majority of its businesses while delivering on its goal to partner more closely with hospitals by offering a greater range of products (a shift in strategy that goes back to its merger with Covidien in 2016). We believe the combination of an emphasis on innovation and providing hospitals with value added services bodes well, as the healthcare system starts placing more emphasis on outcomes rather than products.

Contributors and Detractors for 4Q 2021

Relative ContributorsRelative Detractors
QualcommPayPal Holdings
Martin Marietta MaterialsTwitter
MicrosoftCapital One Financial
LennarAdobe
RPM InternationalMedtronic

Recent Portfolio Activity

BuysSells
Constellation BrandsNovartis

During the quarter, we sold our position in Novartis and used the proceeds to invest in Constellation Brands.

Novartis went through much change during our more than six-year holding period. Vasant (“Vas”) Narasimhan was promoted to CEO in early 2018 and, we believe, has positively influenced the company’s culture. Vas also helped shift the business more toward innovative medicines. Examples include the sale of Novartis’s consumer (over-the-counter) joint venture with GlaxoSmithKline and the spinoff of Alcon, a global leader in the treatment of eye diseases and eye conditions. While we continue to believe Novartis possesses Q-V-C characteristics, we decided to exit our investment in favor of what we view to be a more optimal opportunity in Constellation Brands.

Constellation Brands, Inc.

Founded in 1945 in upstate New York, Constellation Brands is a producer and marketer of beer, wine and spirits. The business grew to scale primarily as a purveyor of wine and spirits but, through M&A, has repositioned itself away from lower-end wine and spirit labels and toward premium beer. With more than $8 billion in annual revenue, Constellation is now the third-largest beer company by market share in the U.S.

Beer sales (~75% of revenue) are anchored by a set of premium Mexican trademarks, including Corona, Modelo and Pacifico. In 2013, Constellation acquired the exclusive and perpetual U.S. distribution rights for these Mexican brands from AB InBev, which had to divest due to antitrust mandates. Constellation’s Wine & Spirits segment (~25%) consists of brands such as Kim Crawford, Meiomi, The Prisoner and Svedka Vodka. It also owns a ~35% stake in Canopy Growth, a prominent Canadian provider of medicinal and recreational cannabis products.

High-Quality Business

Some of the quality characteristics we have identified for Constellation Brands include:

  • Leading market share with more than 80% of the fast-growing Mexican imports segment of U.S. beer. Modelo is the best-selling imported beer in the U.S., and Pacifico is one of the quickest-rising imports
  • Strong management team with a demonstrated ability to successfully market imports to mainstream U.S. populations, gain market share and ramp up distribution of new brands, forge deep relations with distributors and retailers, and expand shelf space with innovations; and
  • The broad resonance of its top-tier brands and premium positioning supports more productive per-dollar promotional spending, affording it best-in-class operating margins among brewers of roughly 40%.

Attractive Valuation

We believe Constellation Brands is attractively valued based on our estimates of higher normalized FREE cash flow due to increased market penetration of its beer labels and enhanced margins for its portfolio of wines.

Compelling Catalysts

Catalysts we have identified for Constellation Brands, which we believe will cause its stock price to appreciate over our three- to five-year investment horizon, include:

  • Constellation’s near monopoly on Mexican beer distribution in the U.S., as well as its hard-to-replicate production capabilities in Mexico, uniquely position it to benefit from the growing Hispanic demographic and increasing popularity of Mexican beer in the U.S.;
  • Continued shelf-space gains, as well as further penetration in bars and restaurants for the Beer segment, as its brands have a small share of total distribution points but a relatively high percentage of sales per distribution point; and
  • Improved margins in Constellation’s Wine & Spirits segment following divestment of its less-profitable, lower-end wine brands.

Conclusion

As we turn the page on another year, we are reminded of the fleeting nature of headline news. Our focus is not on factors that will change in the coming months, but rather on the fundamentals of businesses that may persist for years.

Rather than attempting the impossible task of predicting the unpredictable, we remain steadfast in abiding by our investment philosophy and process that have been in place for nearly 25 years. By utilizing a long-term approach and identifying what we perceive to be high-quality businesses, trading at discounts to our estimates of their intrinsic value, that possess catalysts within management’s control, we believe we can withstand short-term swings and add lasting value for our clients.

Disclosures

The opinions expressed herein are those of Aristotle Capital Management, LLC (Aristotle Capital) and are subject to change without notice. Past performance is not a guarantee or indicator of future results.


This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. You should not assume that any of the securities transactions, sectors or holdings discussed in this report were or will be profitable, or that recommendations Aristotle Capital makes in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of the securities listed in this report. The portfolio characteristics shown relate to the Aristotle Value Equity strategy. Not every client’s account will have these characteristics. Aristotle Capital reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs. There is no assurance that any securities discussed herein will remain in an account’s portfolio at the time you receive this report or that securities sold have not been repurchased. The securities discussed may not represent an account’s entire portfolio and, in the aggregate, may represent only a small percentage of an account’s portfolio holdings. The performance attribution presented is of a representative account from Aristotle Capital’s Value Equity Composite. The representative account is a discretionary client account which was chosen to most closely reflect the investment style of the strategy. The criteria used for representative account selection is based on the account’s period of time under management and its similarity of holdings in relation to the strategy. Recommendations made in the last 12 months are available upon request.

Returns are presented gross and net of investment advisory fees and include the reinvestment of all income. Gross returns will be reduced by fees and other expenses that may be incurred in the management of the account. For example, a 0.5% annual fee deducted quarterly (0.125%) from an account with a ten-year annualized growth rate of 5.0% will produce a net result of 4.4%. Actual performance results will vary from this example.

The Russell 1000 Value® Index measures the performance of the large cap value segment of the U.S. equity universe. It includes those Russell 1000 Index companies with lower price-to-book ratios and lower expected growth values. The S&P 500® Index is the Standard & Poor’s Composite Index of 500 stocks and is a widely recognized, unmanaged index of common stock prices. The Russell 1000® Growth Index measures the performance of the large cap growth segment of the U.S. equity universe. It includes those Russell 1000 companies with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values. The Russell 2000® Index measures the performance of the small cap segment of the U.S. equity universe. The Russell 2000 Index is a subset of the Russell 3000® Index representing approximately 10% of the total market capitalization of that index. It includes approximately 2,000 of the smallest securities based on a combination of their market cap and current index membership. The Dow Jones Industrial Average® is a price-weighted measure of 30 U.S. blue-chip companies. The Index covers all industries except transportation and utilities. The NASDAQ Composite Index measures all NASDAQ domestic and international based common type stocks listed on The NASDAQ Stock Market. The NASDAQ Composite includes over 3,000 companies, more than most other stock market indexes. The Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index is an unmanaged index of domestic investment grade bonds, including corporate, government and mortgage-backed securities. The WTI Crude Oil Index is a major trading classification of sweet light crude oil that serves as a major benchmark price for oil consumed in the United States. The 3-Month U.S. Treasury Bill is a short-term debt obligation backed by the U.S. Treasury Department with a maturity of three months. The volatility (beta) of the Composite may be greater or less than its respective benchmarks. It is not possible to invest directly in these indices. Aristotle Capital Management, LLC is an independent registered investment adviser under the Advisers Act of 1940, as amended. Registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training. More information about Aristotle Capital, including our investment strategies, fees and objectives, can be found in our ADV Part 2, which is available upon request. ACM-2201-30-UBSFA

Performance Disclosures

 

 

 

Composite returns for all periods ended December 31, 2021 are preliminary pending fi nal account reconciliation.
Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance results for periods greater than one year have been annualized. Returns presented are gross and net of investment advisory fees and include the reinvestment of all income. The Aristotle Value Equity strategy has an inception date of November 1, 2010; however, the strategy initially began at Mr. Gleicher’s predecessor firm in October 1997. A supplemental performance track record from January 1, 2001 through October 31, 2010 is provided above. The returns are based on two separate accounts and performance results are based on custodian data. During this time, Mr. Gleicher had primary responsibility for managing the two accounts. Mr. Gleicher began managing one account in November 2000 and the other December 2000. Please see important disclosures enclosed within this document.

FOR PRESENTATION TO MERRILL LYNCH WEALTH MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL ADVISORS ONLY

Markets Review

Markets (total return) performed as follows:

Sources: SS&C Advent, Bloomberg
Past performance is not indicative of future results. Aristotle Value Equity Composite returns are presented gross and net of investment advisory fees and include the reinvestment of all income. Aristotle Capital Composite returns are preliminary pending final account reconciliation. Please see important disclosures at the end of this document.

The U.S. equity market finished the year strong, recording its seventh consecutive quarter of positive performance. Overall, the S&P 500 Index gained 11.03% during the period, which brings its full-year return to 28.71%. Concurrently, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index finished flat for the quarter, which gives the Index a calendar-year return of -1.54%. In terms of style, the Russell 1000 Value Index underperformed its growth counterpart by 3.87% during the quarter, resulting in its full-year underperformance of 2.44%.

On a sector basis, ten out of eleven sectors within the Russell 1000 Value Index finished higher for the quarter, led by Real Estate, Materials and Utilities. The worst performers were Communication Services, the only sector to finish in the red, followed by Financials and Information Technology.

Economic data points were mixed during the period. Although the unemployment rate fell to 4.2%, inching to levels not seen since 2019, the U.S. economy created fewer jobs than expected, as November nonfarm payrolls increased just 210,000. Nonetheless, inflation garnered the most attention as the CPI, driven by energy, food, and used car and truck prices, rose 6.8% on a year-over-year basis—the fastest rate since 1982. Correspondingly, the Federal Reserve (Fed) ceased the use of “transitory” in reference to inflation and subsequently accelerated the tapering of its asset purchase program. Furthermore, new projections based on the median forecast by Fed officials signaled the possibility of three interest rate increases in the new year.

Meanwhile, fiscal policy also made headlines as the $1 trillion bipartisan infrastructure bill was signed into law. However, momentum for the now $1.7 trillion Build Back Better social spending and climate bill stalled, largely due to disagreements over the scope and size of the bill.

In terms of corporate earnings, labor shortages and supply-chain disruptions, specifically procurement issues and input price pressures, continued to impact businesses. Nevertheless, corporate earnings were robust, with year-over-year earnings per share (EPS) growth for S&P 500 constituents reaching nearly 40%, the third-highest figure since 2010, and 82% of S&P 500 companies beating EPS estimates. Additionally, nearly two out of three S&P 500 companies reported improving profitability since the start of the pandemic, citing pricing power and strong demand.

On the COVID front, the Omicron variant became the dominant strain in the U.S., with the number of new daily cases rising to upwards of 500,000, the highest reported figure during the pandemic.

Annual Markets Review

In a year filled with uncertainty, the U.S. economy proved resilient. Even in the face of inflation, supply-chain disruptions, labor shortages and COVID-19 variants, many businesses reported strong earnings growth and stable, if not improving, margins. Themes from 2020, such as fiscal and monetary policy actions, vaccine (and now booster) developments, and economic recovery persisted.

Although we are happy to report another strong year, the constant twists, turns and pivots of this past year are a reminder of the fragility of the short-term. Factors such as the possibility of new variants, the timing of a full recovery, fiscal and monetary policy decisions, and market sentiment are topics better left for reporters. We believe investment managers (and their clients) are best positioned to create lasting value by minimizing distractions and focusing on the longterm.

Performance and Attribution Summary

For the fourth quarter of 2021, Aristotle Capital’s Value Equity Composite posted a total return of 7.86% gross of fees (7.80% net of fees), outperforming the 7.77% return of the Russell 1000 Value Index and underperforming the 11.03% return of the S&P 500 Index. Please refer to the table for detailed performance.

Performance (%) 4Q21 YTD3 Years5 Years10 Years
Value Equity Composite (gross)7.8625.8724.6416.8816.82
Value Equity Composite (net)7.8025.5424.2916.5216.43
Russell 1000 Value Index7.7725.1617.6211.1612.96
S&P 500 Index11.0328.7126.0418.4616.54
Past performance is not indicative of future results. Returns are presented gross and net of investment advisory fees and include the reinvestment of all income. Aristotle Capital Composite returns are preliminary pending final account reconciliation. Please see important disclosures at the end of this document.

Source: FactSet
Past performance is not indicative of future results. Attribution results are based on sector returns, which are gross of investment advisory fees and include the reinvestment of all income. Please see important disclosures at the end of this document.

The portfolio’s outperformance relative to the Russell 1000 Value Index this quarter can be attributed to allocation effects, while security selection had a negative impact. Security selection in Information Technology and Materials and an underweight in Communication Services contributed the most to relative performance. Conversely, security selection in Health Care, Communication Services and Financials detracted. (Relative weights are the result of bottom-up security selection.)

Aggregates producer Martin Marietta Materials was one of the top contributors for the period, as it delivered quarterly (and year-to-date) records for revenues and gross profit. A unique combination of higher organic volumes and price increases was able to offset significantly higher energy-related costs. The company also completed its acquisition of Lehigh Hanson’s West Region business, the second-largest acquisition in its history, increasing the firm’s presence in California and Arizona. Past acquisitions, including Texas Industries and Bluegrass Materials, have been, in our opinion, successfully integrated and have positioned the company with a coast-to-coast footprint and meaningful presence in states with high population inflows and what we think are solid underlying economies (i.e., Texas, Colorado, California, North Carolina, Georgia and Florida). Consistent with its acquisition practices, the company is committed to lowering its debt within the next 18 months. We believe the firm’s prudent capital spending, valueenhancing acquisitions, FREE cash flow generation and “value over volume” pricing strategy position the company to continue to benefit from secular demand trends, including single-family housing and federal and state-level infrastructure investment, as well as nonresidential construction (e.g., warehouse and data centers).

Lennar, one of the nation’s largest homebuilders, was a primary contributor for the quarter. Despite supply-chain challenges affecting everything from the ability to source garage doors, windows and paint, to labor shortages impacting numerous installations, Lennar was able to deliver 18,000 homes during the quarter, an 11% yearover- year growth in deliveries, while also achieving gross and net margin improvements. Such results highlight management’s focus and ability to execute amidst challenging short-term conditions while continuing to deliver on its longer-term strategic plan. To that effect, the firm made progress toward its asset-light model, where currently it controls more than half of its land through the use of options (up from 39% in 2020). This has enhanced the company’s FREE cash flow generation, allowing for the retirement of $850 million of debt and the repurchase of nearly $1 billion in stock in the most recent quarter. Furthermore, as part of its long-time efforts to incorporate technology into its business, Lennar announced commitments with Veev, a vertically integrated end-to-end panelized building technology company, and ICON, a 3D printing construction technology company, to build new communities utilizing their innovative technologies.

PayPal Holdings, the online and mobile e-commerce payments company, was a leading detractor for the period, as investors and analysts seemed focused on the threat of increased competition, as well as quarterly results that fell short of expectations. Nevertheless, PayPal still reported double-digit increases in total payment volume and revenue growth, as well as 13.3 million net new active accounts, bringing the platform’s total to 416 million active accounts. Over the past decade, we have studied PayPal’s ability to grow its extensive dual network (difficult to replicate, in our opinion) while navigating numerous competitors entering the industry. Although there may continue to be short-term headwinds and volatility in the share price, we remain focused on the fundamental advancements and long-term prospects of the business. During the quarter, the company announced that Amazon will be enabling U.S. customers to pay with Venmo, United will allow PayPal QR codes as an inflight payment option, and Honey will be expanding shopping rewards with the introduction of cash back through PayPal. We feel these partnerships display the strength of the PayPal brand, demonstrate progress on catalysts like the monetization of Venmo and enhance the overall PayPal platform.

Medtronic, a U.S.-based global provider of medical devices, was one of the largest detractors for the period following slower reported revenue growth and reduced revenue guidance for the fiscal year. Medtronic (like other businesses) is still facing pandemic-related headwinds, as staffing shortages and patient decisions have, we believe, temporarily reduced demand for non-essential medical procedures. The share price decline was exacerbated by a warning letter issued by the FDA and related to a facility where Medtronic manufactures diabetes pumps (the Diabetes business is 10% of total revenue). While clearly a negative, warning letters are not uncommon, and this matter pertains to legacy issues that Medtronic is actively engaged with the FDA on resolving fully and as quickly as possible. We will be monitoring the situation and may have more to share in the future. Despite short-term setbacks, Medtronic’s focus on innovation has allowed it to continue gaining share in the majority of its businesses while delivering on its goal to partner more closely with hospitals by offering a greater range of products (a shift in strategy that goes back to its merger with Covidien in 2016). We believe the combination of an emphasis on innovation and providing hospitals with value added services bodes well, as the healthcare system starts placing more emphasis on outcomes rather than products.

Contributors and Detractors for 4Q 2021

Relative ContributorsRelative Detractors
QualcommPayPal Holdings
Martin Marietta MaterialsTwitter
MicrosoftCapital One Financial
LennarAdobe
RPM InternationalMedtronic

Recent Portfolio Activity

BuysSells
Constellation BrandsNovartis

During the quarter, we sold our position in Novartis and used the proceeds to invest in Constellation Brands.

Novartis went through much change during our more than six-year holding period. Vasant (“Vas”) Narasimhan was promoted to CEO in early 2018 and, we believe, has positively influenced the company’s culture. Vas also helped shift the business more toward innovative medicines. Examples include the sale of Novartis’s consumer (over-thecounter) joint venture with GlaxoSmithKline and the spinoff of Alcon, a global leader in the treatment of eye diseases and eye conditions. While we continue to believe Novartis possesses Q-V-C characteristics, we decided to exit our investment in favor of what we view to be a more optimal opportunity in Constellation Brands.

Constellation Brands, Inc.

Founded in 1945 in upstate New York, Constellation Brands is a producer and marketer of beer, wine and spirits. The business grew to scale primarily as a purveyor of wine and spirits but, through M&A, has repositioned itself away from lower-end wine and spirit labels and toward premium beer. With more than $8 billion in annual revenue, Constellation is now the third-largest beer company by market share in the U.S.

Beer sales (~75% of revenue) are anchored by a set of premium Mexican trademarks, including Corona, Modelo and Pacifico. In 2013, Constellation acquired the exclusive and perpetual U.S. distribution rights for these Mexican brands from AB InBev, which had to divest due to antitrust mandates. Constellation’s Wine & Spirits segment (~25%) consists of brands such as Kim Crawford, Meiomi, The Prisoner and Svedka Vodka. It also owns a ~35% stake in Canopy Growth, a prominent Canadian provider of medicinal and recreational cannabis products.

High-Quality Business

Some of the quality characteristics we have identified for Constellation Brands include:

  • Leading market share with more than 80% of the fast-growing Mexican imports segment of U.S. beer. Modelo is the best-selling imported beer in the U.S., and Pacifico is one of the quickest-rising imports
  • Strong management team with a demonstrated ability to successfully market imports to mainstream U.S. populations, gain market share and ramp up distribution of new brands, forge deep relations with distributors and retailers, and expand shelf space with innovations; and
  • The broad resonance of its top-tier brands and premium positioning supports more productive per-dollar promotional spending, affording it best-in-class operating margins among brewers of roughly 40%.

Attractive Valuation

We believe Constellation Brands is attractively valued based on our estimates of higher normalized FREE cash flow due to increased market penetration of its beer labels and enhanced margins for its portfolio of wines.

Compelling Catalysts

Catalysts we have identified for Constellation Brands, which we believe will cause its stock price to appreciate over our three- to fiveyear investment horizon, include:

  • Constellation’s near monopoly on Mexican beer distribution in the U.S., as well as its hard-to-replicate production capabilities in Mexico, uniquely position it to benefi t from the growing Hispanic demographic and increasing popularity of Mexican beer in the U.S.;
  • Continued shelf-space gains, as well as further penetration in bars and restaurants for the Beer segment, as its brands have a small share of total distribution points but a relatively high percentage of sales per distribution point; and
  • Improved margins in Constellation’s Wine & Spirits segment following divestment of its less-profi table, lower-end wine brands.

Conclusion

As we turn the page on another year, we are reminded of the fleeting nature of headline news. Our focus is not on factors that will change in the coming months, but rather on the fundamentals of businesses that may persist for years.

Rather than attempting the impossible task of predicting the unpredictable, we remain steadfast in abiding by our investment philosophy and process that have been in place for nearly 25 years. By utilizing a long-term approach and identifying what we perceive to be high-quality businesses, trading at discounts to our estimates of their intrinsic value, that possess catalysts within management’s control, we believe we can withstand short-term swings and add lasting value for our clients.

Disclosures

The opinions expressed herein are those of Aristotle Capital Management, LLC (Aristotle Capital) and are subject to change without notice. Past performance is not a guarantee or indicator of future results.

This material is not financial advice or an offer to purchase or sell any product. You should not assume that any of the securities transactions, sectors or holdings discussed in this report were or will be profitable, or that recommendations Aristotle Capital makes in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of the securities listed in this report. The portfolio characteristics shown relate to the Aristotle Value Equity strategy. Not every client’s account will have these characteristics. Aristotle Capital reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs. There is no assurance that any securities discussed herein will remain in an account’s portfolio at the time you receive this report or that securities sold have not been repurchased. The securities discussed may not represent an account’s entire portfolio and, in the aggregate, may represent only a small percentage of an account’s portfolio holdings. The performance attribution presented is of a representative account from Aristotle Capital’s Value Equity Composite. The representative account is a discretionary client account which was chosen to most closely reflect the investment style of the strategy. The criteria used for representative account selection is based on the account’s period of time under management and its similarity of holdings in relation to the strategy. Recommendations made in the last 12 months are available upon request.

Returns are presented gross and net of investment advisory fees and include the reinvestment of all income. Gross returns will be reduced by fees and other expenses that may be incurred in the management of the account. For example, a 0.5% annual fee deducted quarterly (0.125%) from an account with a ten-year annualized growth rate of 5.0% will produce a net result of 4.4%. Actual performance results will vary from this example.

The Russell 1000 Value® Index measures the performance of the large cap value segment of the U.S. equity universe. It includes those Russell 1000 Index companies with lower price-to-book ratios and lower expected growth values. The S&P 500® Index is the Standard & Poor’s Composite Index of 500 stocks and is a widely recognized, unmanaged index of common stock prices. The Russell 1000® Growth Index measures the performance of the large cap growth segment of the U.S. equity universe. It includes those Russell 1000 companies with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values. The Russell 2000® Index measures the performance of the small cap segment of the U.S. equity universe. The Russell 2000 Index is a subset of the Russell 3000® Index representing approximately 10% of the total market capitalization of that index. It includes approximately 2,000 of the smallest securities based on a combination of their market cap and current index membership. The Dow Jones Industrial Average® is a price weighted measure of 30 U.S. blue-chip companies. The Index covers all industries except transportation and utilities. The NASDAQ Composite Index measures all NASDAQ domestic and international based common type stocks listed on The NASDAQ Stock Market. The NASDAQ Composite includes over 3,000 companies, more than most other stock market indexes. The Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index is an unmanaged index of domestic investment grade bonds, including corporate, government and mortgage-backed securities. The WTI Crude Oil Index is a major trading classification of sweet light crude oil that serves as a major benchmark price for oil consumed in the United States. The 3-Month U.S. Treasury Bill is a short-term debt obligation backed by the U.S. Treasury Department with a maturity of three months. The volatility (beta) of the Composite may be greater or less than its respective benchmarks. It is not possible to invest directly in these indices.

Aristotle Capital Management, LLC is an independent registered investment adviser under the Advisers Act of 1940, as amended. Registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training. More information about Aristotle Capital, including our investment strategies, fees and objectives, can be found in our ADV Part 2, which is available upon request. ACM-2201-30-MLFA

Performance Disclosures

 

 

 

Composite returns for all periods ended December 31, 2021 are preliminary pending final account reconciliation.

Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance results for periods greater than one year have been annualized. Returns presented are gross and net of investment advisory fees and include the reinvestment of all income. The Aristotle Value Equity strategy has an inception date of November 1, 2010; however, the strategy initially began at Mr. Gleicher’s predecessor firm in October 1997. A supplemental performance track record from January 1, 2001 through October 31, 2010 is provided above. The returns are based on two separate accounts and performance results are based on custodian data. During this time, Mr. Gleicher had primary responsibility for managing the two accounts. Mr. Gleicher began managing one account in November 2000 and the other December 2000. Please see important disclosures enclosed within this document.

FOR FINANCIAL ADVISORS ONLY.  NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION.

Markets Review

The small/mid cap segment of the equity market, as measured by the Russell 2500 Index, appreciated 3.82% in the fourth quarter, capping a strong 2021 in which the asset class returned 18.18% for the full calendar year.  Despite posting positive returns during the quarter, the period was not without volatility, as the emergence of the highly infectious Omicron variant captured headlines and led to a 10% intra-quarter decline in the Russell 2500 Index.  Small/mid caps quickly recovered into year-end however, as global data indicated the new variant may have a lower probability of hospitalization as compared to prior variants.

On the policy front, the U.S. Federal Reserve (Fed) took center stage, as the rapidly tightening labor market and persistent inflationary pressures pushed the Fed to adopt a more hawkish stance.  The shift in Fed posturing appears to have been triggered by recent inflation and labor market data.  In November, U.S. headline inflation posted a 39-year high, clocking in at 6.8% on a year-over-year basis, while the unemployment rate ticked down to just 4.2%.  At the time of this writing, markets are currently pricing in three rate hikes in 2022; however, the situation remains fluid as a host of uncertainties could potentially alter the pace and direction of hikes throughout the year.

Stylistically, value outperformed growth in the fourth quarter, as measured by the Russell 2500 Value Index’s return of 6.36% compared to the 0.20% return of the Russell 2500 Growth Index.  For the full year, the Russell 2500 Value turned in strong relative performance versus the Russell 2500 Growth, generating a total return of 27.78% compared to 5.04% and marking the first time in the last five calendar years where value has led the market.  Fundamentally, companies with lower valuations, stronger profitability and higher return on equity generally outperformed, signaling a recent shift in sentiment towards more reasonably valued, higher quality companies within the small/mid cap space.

At the sector level, nine of the eleven sectors within the Russell 2500 Index generated positive returns during the quarter, led by Utilities (+12.14%), Real Estate (+11.49%) and Materials (+10.75%).  Communication Services (-7.93%), Health Care (-6.05%) and Consumer Discretionary (+1.79%) underperformed, trailing the broader market as represented by the Russell 2500 Index.

Sources: SS&C Advent; Russell Investments

Past performance is not indicative of future results. Returns are presented gross and net of investment advisory fees and include the reinvestment of all income. Aristotle Boston Composite returns are preliminary pending final account reconciliation. Please see important disclosures at the end of this document. price-to-earnings data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Please see important disclosures at the end of this document.

Performance Review

For the fourth quarter of 2021, the Aristotle Small/Mid Cap Equity Composite generated a total return of 5.25% gross of fees (5.13% net of fees), outperforming the 3.82% total return of the Russell 2500 Index and underperforming the 6.36% total return of the Russell 2500 Value Index.  Overall, security selection accounted for the majority of the strategy’s outperformance during the quarter.  Security selection within the Information Technology, Industrials and Consumer Staples sectors added the most value on a relative basis, while selection within Materials, Energy and Consumer Discretionary detracted.  From an allocation perspective, the portfolio benefited from an underweight in Communication Services and an overweight in Industrials; however, this was partially offset by underweights in Real Estate and Utilities. 

Relative ContributorsRelative Detractors
RogersMerit Medical Systems
Bottomline TechnologiesHealthEquity
Dycom IndustriesRange Resources
MACOM Technology Solutions1-800-FLOWERS.COM
CienaCharles River Laboratories

CONTRIBUTORS

Security selection added the most value within the Information Technology, Industrials and Consumer Staples sectors.  From an allocation perspective, an underweight in Communication Services and an overweight in Industrials contributed positively to relative performance.  Additionally, the portfolio’s orientation toward companies with reasonable valuations and strong free cash flow profiles also contributed.  At the company level, Rogers and Bottomline Technologies were two of the largest contributors during the quarter.

  • Rogers (ROG), a designer/manufacturer of highly engineered materials for a variety of end markets, appreciated following an announcement that the company was being acquired in an all-cash transaction by DuPont (DD).
  • Bottomline Technologies (EPAY), a New Hampshire-based FinTech company offering digital banking, legal spend management and online bill pay solutions for corporations, appreciated on the news it is being acquired by private equity sponsor Thoma Bravo.

DETRACTORS

Security selection detracted within the Materials, Energy and Consumer Discretionary sectors.  Additionally, underweight exposures in Real Estate and Utilities detracted from relative performance.  At the company level, Merit Medical Systems and HealthEquity were two of the largest detractors during the quarter.

  • Merit Medical Systems (MMSI), a Utah-based developer and manufacturer of disposable medical products, pulled back following a strong rebound from the pandemic-induced lows.  Concerns about the impact from a potential slowdown in elective medical procedures as a result of the spread of the Omicron variant may be contributing to the pullback.  Nevertheless, we continue to maintain a position, as we believe company-specific self-help initiatives introduced in 2019 have begun to produce financial benefits for the company.  Furthermore, we believe the long-term secular outlook for the company’s products remains solid.
  • HealthEquity (HQY), a Utah-based provider of Health Savings Accounts (HSA) and Consumer Directed Benefits (CDB) services, pulled back on disappointing fundamental performance, as a continued delay in return-to-work has weighed on the CDB portion of their business.  We continue to maintain a position due to the attractive secular and stable outlook for the company’s core HSA business, along with the expectation that the CDB part of the business will eventually rebound.

Recent Portfolio Activity

BuysSells
United Community BanksFulton Financial
Team

BUYS/ACQUISITIONS

  • United Community Banks (UCBI), is a bank holding company that provides business and consumer banking services in the southeast region of the U.S. In addition to shares being attractively valued, we believe the company’s exposure to markets growing faster than the national average, strong credit performance of their loan portfolio and balance sheet capacity to grow their loan portfolio should create value for shareholders going forward.

SELLS/LIQUIDATIONS

  • Fulton Financial (FULT), a Pennsylvania-based regional bank, was eliminated from the portfolio due to our view that the fundamental outlook for the business was reflected in the valuation and that there were more attractive investment opportunities elsewhere.
  • Team (TISI), a provider of specialty industrial services for the refining, petrochemical, power and pipeline industries, was removed from the portfolio as a result of ongoing disappointing fundamental performance, along with a surprising negative legal development that called into question the ongoing viability of the business.

Outlook and Positioning

Global equity markets, including U.S. small/mid caps, posted healthy returns in 2021, although the year was not without its challenges. Inflationary pressures continue to linger, central banks are becoming more aggressive, supply chain issues remain and pandemic-related uncertainties persist.  While each of these factors, along with a plethora of others, may contribute to uncertainty and affect investors’ risk appetites over the near term, we believe equity markets will continue to be driven by business fundamentals over the long term.

From a fundamental standpoint, we believe the economic backdrop in the U.S. remains supportive of small/mid cap equities over the next multi-year horizon.  While we are, by no means, market prognosticators, the company-specific insights that we have obtained through our bottom-up research lead us to believe that there is the opportunity for further appreciation, especially for companies with solid fundamentals and compelling valuations.  Additionally, as the Fed continues its path towards interest rate normalization, and as company fundamentals and valuations become increasingly more important, we believe this development should be beneficial for fundamentally-oriented, active managers like ourselves.

Our current positioning is a function of our bottom-up security selection process and our ability to identify what we view as attractive investment candidates, regardless of economic sector definitions. Overweights in Industrials, Information Technology and Financials are broad-based with recent purchases across a variety of industries and end markets. Conversely, we continue to be underweight in Consumer Discretionary, as we have been unable to identify what we consider to be compelling opportunities that fit our discipline given the rising risk profiles as a result of structural headwinds for various brick and mortar businesses. We also continue to be underweight in Real Estate as a result of valuations and structural challenges for various end markets within the sector. Given our focus on long-term business fundamentals, patient investment approach and low portfolio turnover, the strategy’s sector positioning generally does not change significantly from quarter to quarter; however, we may take advantage of periods of volatility by adding selectively to certain companies when appropriate. As always, our focus remains on identifying what we view as attractive, long-term investment opportunities that can create value for shareholders over the next three to five years, which we believe gives us the best opportunity to generate alpha for our clients.

Disclosures

The opinions expressed herein are those of Aristotle Capital Boston, LLC (Aristotle Boston) and are subject to change without notice.

Past performance is not indicative of future results. The information provided in this report should not be considered financial advice or a recommendation to purchase or sell any particular security. There is no assurance that any securities discussed herein will remain in an account’s portfolio at the time you receive this report or that securities sold have not been repurchased. The securities discussed may not represent an account’s entire portfolio and, in the aggregate, may represent only a small percentage of an account’s portfolio holdings. The performance attribution presented is of a representative account from Aristotle Boston’s Small/Mid Cap Equity Composite. The representative account is a discretionary client account which was chosen to most closely reflect the investment style of the strategy.

The criteria used for representative account selection is based on the account’s period of time under management and its similarity of holdings in relation to the strategy. It should not be assumed that any of the securities transactions, holdings or sectors discussed were or will be profitable, or that the investment recommendations or decisions Aristotle Boston makes in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of the securities discussed herein. Aristotle Boston reserves the right to modify its current investment strategies and techniques based on changing market dynamics or client needs. Recommendations made in the last 12 months are available upon request.

Returns are presented gross and net of investment advisory fees and include the reinvestment of all income. Gross returns will be reduced by fees and other expenses that may be incurred in the management of the account. For example, a 0.5% annual fee deducted quarterly (0.125%) from an account with a ten-year annualized growth rate of 5.0% will produce a net result of 4.4%. Actual performance results will vary from this example.

The Russell 2500 Index is a subset of the Russell 3000® Index representing approximately 10% of the total market capitalization of that index. It includes approximately 2000 of the smallest securities based on a combination of their market cap and current index membership. The Russell 2500 Growth® Index measures the performance of the small/mid cap companies located in the United States that also exhibit a growth probability. The Russell 2500 Value® Index measures the performance of the small/mid cap companies located in the United States that also exhibit a value probability. The Russell 2000® Index measures the performance of the small cap segment of the U.S. equity universe. The Russell 2000 Index is a subset of the Russell 3000® Index representing approximately 10% of the total market capitalization of that index. It includes approximately 2000 of the smallest securities based on a combination of their market cap and current index membership. The Russell 1000® Index measures the performance of the large cap value segment of the U.S. equity universe. The volatility (beta) of the composite may be greater or less than the benchmarks. It is not possible to invest directly in these indices.

This presentation is to report on the investment strategies as reported by Aristotle Capital Management, LLC and is for illustrative purposes only. The information contained herein is obtained from multiple sources and believed to be reliable. Information has not been verified by Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, and may differ from documents created by Morgan Stanley Wealth Management. The financial advisor should refer to the Profile. This must be preceded or accompanied by the Morgan Stanley Wealth Management Profile, which you can obtain from the Morgan Stanley Wealth Management Performance Analytics. For additional information on other programs, please speak to Patrick Schussman at Aristotle Capital at (310) 954-8156.

Aristotle Capital Boston, LLC is an independent investment adviser registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended. Registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training. More information about Aristotle Boston, including our investment strategies, fees and objectives, can be found in our Form ADV Part 2, which is available upon request. ACB-2201-18-MSFA

Performance Disclosures

 

 

Sources: SS&C Advent, Russell Investments
Composite returns for periods ended December 31, 2021 are preliminary pending final account reconciliation.
1The Aristotle Small/Mid Cap Equity Composite has an inception date of January 1, 2008 at a predecessor firm. During this time, Jack McPherson and Dave Adams had primary responsibility for managing the strategy. Performance starting January 1, 2015 was achieved at Aristotle Boston.
Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance results for periods greater than one year have been annualized.
Returns are presented gross and net of investment advisory fees and include the reinvestment of all income. Gross returns will be reduced by fees and other expenses that may be incurred in the management of the account. Please see important disclosures enclosed within this document